Repeatability of foraging tactics in young brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis

Canadian Field-Naturalist

Volumn 122, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 40-44

  Biro, Peter A ^a,b   Ridgway, Mark S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (Canada)

Author keywords

Activity; Behaviour; Brook trout; Foraging; Juveniles; Salvelinus fontinalis

Indexed keywords

BIMODAL ASSOCIATION; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; HERITABILITY; JUVENILE; SALMONID;

SALMONIDAE; SALVELINUS FONTINALIS;

EID: 73649139267     PISSN: 00083550     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.22621/cfn.v122i1.541     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Biro, P. A. 1996. Space-use by juvenile brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) in lakes: the central-place territorial model does not apply. MSc thesis. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
2. Biro, P. A., M. V. Abrahams, J. R. Post, and E. A. Parkinson. 2004. Predators select against high growth rates and risk-taking behaviour in domestic trout populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271: 2233-2237.
3. Biro, P.A., and M. S. Ridgway. 1995. Individual variation in foraging movements in a lake population of young-of-the-year brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Behaviour 120: 1-12.
4. Biro, P. A., M. S. Ridgway, and R. L. McLaughlin. 1996. Does the rate of foraging attempts predict ingestion rate for young-of-the-year brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in the field? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 1814-1820.
5. Biro, P. A., M. S. Ridgway, and D. L. G. Noakes. 1997. The central-place territorial model does not apply to space-use by juvenile brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) in lakes. Journal of Animal Ecology 66: 837-845.
6. Bolnick, D. I., R. Svanback, J. A. Fordyce, L. H. Yang, J. M. Davis, C. D. Hulsey, and M. L. Forister. 2003. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. The American Naturalist 161: 1-28.
7. Falconer, D. S. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd edition. Longman, London.
8. Futuyma, D. J., and G. Moreno. 1988. The evolution of spe-cialization. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19: 207-233.
9. Gjedrem, T. 2000. Genetic improvement of cold-water fish species. Aquaculture Research 31: 25-33.
10. Gross, M. R. 1998. One species with two biologies: Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the wild and in aquaculture. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 131-144.
11. Imre I, R. L. McLaughlin, and D. L. G. Noakes. 2002. Phenotypic plasticity in brook charr: changes in caudal fin induced by water flow. Journal of Fish Biology 61: 1171-1181.
12. Lessells, C. M., and P. T. Boag. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. The Auk 104: 116-121.
13. McLaughlin, R. L. 2001. Behavioural diversification in brook charr adaptive responses to local conditions. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 325-337.
14. McLaughlin, R. L., M. M. Ferguson, and D. L. G. Noakes. 1999. Adaptive peaks and alternative foraging tactics in brook charr evidence of short-term divergent selection for sitting-and-waiting and actively searching. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 45: 386-395.
15. McLaughlin, R. L., and J. W. A. Grant. 1994. Morphological and behavioural differences among recently-emerged brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis, foraging in slow- vs. fast-running water. Environmental Biology of Fishes 39: 289-300.
16. McLaughlin, R. L., J. W. A. Grant, and D. L. Kramer. 1992. Individual variation and alternative patterns of for-aging movements in recently-emerged brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Behaviour 120: 286-301.
17. McNicol, R. E., and D. L. G. Noakes. 1979. Caudal fin branding fish for individual recognitition in behavior studies. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 11: 95-97.
18. Morinvilie, G. R., and J. B. Rasmussen. 2003. Early juvenile bioenergetic differences between anadromous and resident brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:401-410.
19. Robinson, B. W., and D. S. Wilson. 1994. Character release and displacement in fishes: a neglected literature. The American Naturalist 144: 598-627.
20. Schluter, D. 1996. Ecological speciation in postglacial fishes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 351: 807-814.
21. Sih, A., A. Bell, and J. Chadwich. 2004. Behavioral syn-dromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 372-378. (Pubitemid 38800923)
22. Skúlason, S., and T. B. Smith. 1995. Resource polymorphisms in vertebrates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 366-370.
23. Smith, T. B., and S. Skúlason. 1996. Evolutionary significance of resource polymorphisms in fishes, amphibians, and birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27: 111-133.
24. Vamosi, S. M., and D. Schluter. 2002. Impacts of trout predation on fitness of sympatric sticklebacks and their hybrids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269: 923-930.
25. Werner, E. E., and B. R. Anholt. 1993. Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. The American Naturalist 142: 242-272.
26. Wilson, D. S. 1998. Adaptive individual differences within single populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 353: 199-205.
27. Wimberger, P. H. 1994. Trophic polymorphisms, plasticity, and speciation in vertebrates. In Advances in Fish Foraging Theory and Ecology. Edited by D. J. Stouder, and K. Fresh. Belle Baruch Press, Columbia, South Carolina.