Development of goal-sensitive health-related utility assessment procedures

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 590-598

  Schwartz, Alan ^a   Hazen, Gordon B ^c   Leifer, Ariel ^a   Heckerling, Paul S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

^c Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Goals; Quality of life; Time tradeoff; Utility assessment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS;

EID: 73649131256     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09336145     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, eds. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press ; 1996.
2. Tsevat J. What do utilities measure? Medical Care. 2000 ; 38 (9 suppl II). II-160-164.
3. Sutherland HJ, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Boyd NF, Till JE Attitudes towards quality of survival: the concept of maximal endurable time. Med Decis Making. 1982 ; 2: 299-309.
4. Schwartz A., Hazen G., Leifer A., Heckerling P. Life goals and health decisions-what will people live (or die) for ? Med Decis Making. 2008 ; 28: 209-219.
5. Hazen GB Adding extrinsic goals to the quality-adjusted life year model. Decis Anal. 2007 ; 4: 3.
6. Hazen GB, Schwartz A. Incorporating extrinsic goals into decision and cost-effectiveness analyses. Med Decis Making. 2009 Mar 27 [Epub ahead of print].
7. Miyamoto JM, Eraker SA A multiplicative model of the utility of survival duration and health quality. J Exp Psychol. 1988 ; 117: 3-20.
8. Olejnik S., Algina J. Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychol Methods. 2003 ; 8: 434-447.
9. Bakeman R. Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods. 2005 ; 37: 379-384.
10. Feeny D., Furlong W., Boyle M., Torrance GW Multi-attribute health status classification systems: Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 ; 7: 490-502.
11. Feeny D., Furlong W., Torrance GW, et al. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System. Med Care. 2002 ; 40: 113.
12. Luo N., Wang Q., Feeny D., Chen G., Li SC, Thumboo J. Measuring health preferences for Health Utilities Index Mark 3 Health States: a study of feasibility and preference differences among ethnic groups in Singapore. Med Decis Making. 2007 ; 27: 61.
13. van der Pol M., Shiell A. Extrinsic goals and time tradeoff. Med Decis Making. 2007 ; 27: 406-413.
14. Suarez-Almazor M., Souchek J., Byrne M., et al. Valuation of health states using time trade-off and standard gamble: Non-traders and non-gamblers. Med Decis Making. 2004 ; 24: 426.
15. Howard RA Risk preference. In: Howard RA, Matheson JE, eds. Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis. Vol. 2. Palo Alto (CA): Strategic Decisions Group ; 1989: 628-663.
16. Birnbaum MH Controversies in psychological measurement. In: Wegner B, ed. Social Attitudes and Psychophysical Measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1982: 401-485.