A cautious defense of intellectual oligopoly with fringe competition

Review of Law and Economics

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 1025-1035

  Lemley, Mark A ^a  

^a STANFORD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Copyright; Intellectual monopoly; Patents

Indexed keywords

EID: 73649129582     PISSN: 15555879     EISSN: 15555879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2202/1555-5879.1436     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allison, John R., and Ronald J. Mann. 2007. "Software Patents, Incumbents, and Entry," 85 Texas Law Review 1579.
2. Arrow, Kenneth. 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention" in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. NBER Books.
3. Baker, Jonathan B. 2007. "Beyond Schumpeter v. Arrow: How Antitrust Fosters Innovation," 74 Antitrust Law Journal 575.
4. -. 2008. "'Dynamic Competition' Does Not Excuse Monopolization" SSRN Working Paper, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=1285223.
5. Benkler, Yochai. 2002. "Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm," 112 Yale Law Journal 369.
6. -. 2006. The Wealth of Networks. Yale University Press.
7. Bessen, James. 2008. "More Machines or Better Machines?" Research on Innovation Working Paper, *http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/ roiwpaper/0803.htm.
8. - and Michael J. Meurer. 2008. Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk. Princeton University Press.
9. Boldrin, Michele, and David K. Levine. 2008. Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Burk, Dan L., and Mark A. Lemley. 2009. The Patent Crisis and How the Courts Can Solve It. University of Chicago Press.
11. Cotropia, Christopher A., and Mark A. Lemley. 2009. "Copying in Patent Law," 87 North Carolina Law Review 1421.
12. Jeffreys, Diarmuid. 2005. Aspirin: The Remarkable Story of a Wonder Drug. Bloomsbury USA.
13. Duffy, John F. 2004. "Rethinking the Prospect Theory of Patents," 71 University of Chicago Law Review 435.
14. Eisenberg, Rebecca S. 2001. "The Shifting Functional Balance of Patents and Drug Regulation," 19 Health Affairs 119.
15. Frischmann, Brett M., and Mark A. Lemley. 2007. "Spillovers," 107 Columbia Law Review 257.
16. Kitch, Edmund W. 1977. "The Nature and Function of the Patent System," 20 Journal of Law and Economics 265.
17. Hemphill, C. Scott. 2006. "Paying for Delay: Pharmaceutical Patent Settlement as a Regulatory Design Problem," 81 NYU Law Review 1553.
18. - and Jeannie Suk. 2009. "The Law, Culture, and Economics of Fashion," 61 Stanford Law Review 1147.
19. Hovenkamp, Herbert J., Mark D. Janis, and Mark A. Lemley. 2001. IP and Antitrust: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles Applied to Intellectual Property Law, Volume 1, § 4.2. Aspen Law & Business Publishers.
20. -, Mark D. Janis, and Mark A. Lemley. 2003. "Anticompetitive Settlement of Intellectual Property Disputes," 87 Minnesota Law Review 1719.
21. Lemley, Mark A. 2000. "Reconceiving Patents in the Age of Venture Capital," 4 Journal of Small and Emerging Business Law 137.
22. -. 2004. "Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Justifications for Intellectual Property," 71 University of Chicago Law Review 129.
23. -. 2007a. "A New Balance Between IP and Antitrust," 13 Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas 237.
24. -. 2007b. "Should Patent Infringement Require Proof of Copying?" 105 Michigan Law Review 1525.
25. -. 2009. "Distinguishing Lost Profits From Reasonable Royalties," 51 William and Mary Law Review 655.
26. - and Philip J. Weiser. 2007. "Should Property or Liability Rules Govern Information?" 85 Texas Law Review 783.
27. Lessig, Lawrence. 1996. "Intellectual Property and Code," 11 St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary 635.
28. Long, Clarisa. 2002. "Patent Signals," 69 University of Chicago Law Review 625.
29. Love, Brian J. 2007. "Patentee Overcompensation and the Entire Market Value Rule," 60 Stanford Law Review 263.
30. Lunney, Glynn S., Jr., 1996. "Reexamining Copyright's Incentives-Access Paradigm," 49 Vanderbilt Law Review 483.
31. McGowan, David. 2001. "Legal Implications of Open Source Software," 2001 University of Illinois Law Review 241.
32. Moore, Kimberly A. 2005. "Worthless Patents," 20 Berkeley Tech. Law Journal 1521.
33. Raustiala, Kal, and Christopher Sprigman. 2006. "The Piracy Paradox: Innovation and Intellectual Property in Fashion Design," 92 Virginia Law Review 1687.
34. Ridgway, William E. 2006. "Realizing Two-Tiered Innovation Policy Through Drug Regulation," 58 Stanford Law Review 1221.
35. Scherer, F.M. 2009. "Book Review," 20 Constitutional Political Economy 94.
36. Schumpeter, Joseph. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy.
37. Solow, Robert M. 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," 70 Quarterly Journal of Economics 65.
38. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2008. "Economic Foundations of Intellectual Property Rights," 57Duke Law Journal 1693.
39. Vermont, Samson. 2006. "Independent Invention as a Defense to Patent Infringement," 105 Michigan Law Review 475.
40. Yoo, Christopher S. 2004. "Copyright and Product Differentiation," 79 NYU Law Review 212.