-
2
-
-
84977586068
-
-
10.1002/andp.19053220806
-
A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. 322, 549 (1905). 10.1002/andp.19053220806
-
(1905)
Ann. Phys.
, vol.322
, pp. 549
-
-
Einstein, A.1
-
7
-
-
0007052919
-
-
10.1007/BF01428644
-
F. Eirich, Kolloid-Z. 74, 276 (1936). 10.1007/BF01428644
-
(1936)
Kolloid-Z.
, vol.74
, pp. 276
-
-
Eirich, F.1
-
8
-
-
27144546640
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.014502
-
Z. Li and H. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 014502 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.014502
-
(2005)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.95
, pp. 014502
-
-
Li, Z.1
Wang, H.2
-
9
-
-
1442354701
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevE.68.061206
-
Z. Li and H. Wang, Phys. Rev. E 68, 061206 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevE.68. 061206
-
(2003)
Phys. Rev. e
, vol.68
, pp. 061206
-
-
Li, Z.1
Wang, H.2
-
10
-
-
1442330212
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevE.68.061207
-
Z. Li and H. Wang, Phys. Rev. E 68, 061207 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevE.68. 061207
-
(2003)
Phys. Rev. e
, vol.68
, pp. 061207
-
-
Li, Z.1
Wang, H.2
-
13
-
-
0000610056
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevE.53.4852
-
M. Vergeles, P. Keblinski, J. Koplik, and J. R. Banavar, Phys. Rev. E 53, 4852 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.4852
-
(1996)
Phys. Rev. e
, vol.53
, pp. 4852
-
-
Vergeles, M.1
Keblinski, P.2
Koplik, J.3
Banavar, J.R.4
-
18
-
-
33748716124
-
-
10.1039/a800877i
-
D. M. Heyes, M. J. Nuevo, and J. J. Morales, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 94, 1625 (1998). 10.1039/a800877i
-
(1998)
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans.
, vol.94
, pp. 1625
-
-
Heyes, D.M.1
Nuevo, M.J.2
Morales, J.J.3
-
25
-
-
34249657430
-
-
10.1021/nl070192x
-
A. Tuteja, M. E. Mackay, S. Narayanan, S. Asokan, and M. S. Wong, Nano Lett. 7, 1276 (2007). 10.1021/nl070192x
-
(2007)
Nano Lett.
, vol.7
, pp. 1276
-
-
Tuteja, A.1
MacKay, M.E.2
Narayanan, S.3
Asokan, S.4
Wong, M.S.5
-
29
-
-
30944436511
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevB.48.22
-
F. Cleri and V. Rosato, Phys. Rev. B 48, 22 (1993). 10.1103/PhysRevB.48. 22
-
(1993)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.48
, pp. 22
-
-
Cleri, F.1
Rosato, V.2
-
30
-
-
33751556198
-
-
10.1063/1.2372715
-
Z. Li and G. Drazer, Phys. Fluids 18, 117102 (2006). 10.1063/1.2372715
-
(2006)
Phys. Fluids
, vol.18
, pp. 117102
-
-
Li, Z.1
Drazer, G.2
-
33
-
-
0000399853
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.710
-
P. Wiltzius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 710 (1987). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.710
-
(1987)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.58
, pp. 710
-
-
Wiltzius, P.1
-
34
-
-
0002821446
-
-
10.1051/jphysrad:01936007010100
-
F. Perrin, J. Phys. Radium 7, 1 (1936). 10.1051/jphysrad:01936007010100
-
(1936)
J. Phys. Radium
, vol.7
, pp. 1
-
-
Perrin, F.1
-
35
-
-
84886764942
-
-
10.1017/S0022112059000222
-
H. Hasimoto, J. Fluid Mech. 5, 317 (1959). 10.1017/S0022112059000222
-
(1959)
J. Fluid Mech.
, vol.5
, pp. 317
-
-
Hasimoto, H.1
-
37
-
-
3042622341
-
-
10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/054;
-
V. Lobaskin and B. Dunweg, New J. Phys. 6, 54 (2004) 10.1088/1367-2630/6/ 1/054
-
(2004)
New J. Phys.
, vol.6
, pp. 54
-
-
Lobaskin, V.1
Dunweg, B.2
-
40
-
-
73649096731
-
-
It is noted that most of the CPU time are spent for calculating the fluid-particle interactions. The tight-binding potential for the particle is not the major reason for time consumption. If the LJ potential is used for the particle, for the system with the largest particle, the CPU time can only be reduced by about 7%.
-
It is noted that most of the CPU time are spent for calculating the fluid-particle interactions. The tight-binding potential for the particle is not the major reason for time consumption. If the LJ potential is used for the particle, for the system with the largest particle, the CPU time can only be reduced by about 7%.
-
-
-
-
43
-
-
70349500351
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevE.80.036302
-
C. Liu and Z. Li, Phys. Rev. E 80, 036302 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevE.80. 036302
-
(2009)
Phys. Rev. e
, vol.80
, pp. 036302
-
-
Liu, C.1
Li, Z.2
-
44
-
-
34548095161
-
-
10.1063/1.2766952
-
Z. Li and L. Hong, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 074706 (2007). 10.1063/1.2766952
-
(2007)
J. Chem. Phys.
, vol.127
, pp. 074706
-
-
Li, Z.1
Hong, L.2
|