Responding to the challenges of 'Against Intellectual Monopoly'

Review of Law and Economics

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 1115-1129

  Vertinsky, Liza S ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Intellectual property; New institutional economics

Indexed keywords

EID: 73649104811     PISSN: 15555879     EISSN: 15555879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2202/1555-5879.1431     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arrow, Kenneth. 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Innovation," in R.R. Nelson, ed. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Baker, Jonathan B. 2007. "Beyond Schumpeter vs. Arrow: How Antitrust Fosters Innovation," 74 Antitrust Law Journal 575.
3. Coase, Ronald H. 1964. "The Regulated Industries: Discussion," 54 American Economic Review 195.
4. Barnett, Jonathan M. 2008. "Sharing in the Shadow of Property: Rational Cooperation in Innovation Markets," USC CLEO Research Paper No. C08-22.
5. Boldrin, Michele, and David Levine. 2008. Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Burk, Dan L. 2004. "Intellectual Property and the Firm," 71 Univ. of Chicago Law Review 3.
7. - and Mark A. Lemley. 2009. The Patent Crisis and How the Courts Can Solve It. University of Chicago Press.
8. Frischmann, Brett. 2000. "Innovation and Institutions: Rethinking the Economics of US Science and Technology Policy," 24 Vermont Law Review 347.
9. Heald, Paul J. 2007. "Transaction Costs and Patent Reform," 23 Santa Clara Computer and High Tech. Law Journal 447.
10. Holbrook, Timothy. 2000. "The Expressive Impact of Patents," 84 Washington University Law Review 573.
11. Kieff, F. Scott. 2006. "Coordination, Property & Intellectual Property: An Unconventional Approach to Anticompetitive Effects & Downstream Access," 56 Emory Law Journal 327.
12. Kitch, Edmund. 1977. "The Nature and Function of the Patent System," 20 Journal of Law and Economics 265.
13. Lemley, Mark. 2004. "Ex Ante versus Ex Post Justifications for Intellectual Property," 71 University of Chicago Law Review 129.
14. -. 2009. "Intellectual Oligopoly: A Cautious Defense of Intellectual Oligopoly with Fringe Competition," Stanford University Working Paper No. 374, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1407798.
15. Liivak, Oskar. 2009. "Patents, Property and Competition," unpublished working paper, Cornell University.
16. Long, Clarisa. 2002. "Patent Signals," 69 University Chicago Law Review 625.
17. Macdonald, S. 2004. "When Means Become Ends: Considering the Impact of Patent Strategy on Innovation," 16 Information Economics and Policy 135.
18. Madison, Michael J., Brett M. Frischmann, and Katherine J. Strandburg. 2008. "Constructing Commons in the Cultural Environment," University of Pittsburgh Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1265793 (forthcoming, 2010, Cornell Law Review).
19. Merges, Robert P. 2000. "Intellectual Property Rights and the New Institutional Economics," 53 Vanderbilt Law Review 1857.
20. North, Douglass C. 1993. "Prize Lecture: Economic Performance through Time," Nobel Prize.Org, Section II.
21. -. 2009. "A Recommendation on How to Intelligently Approach Emerging Problems in Intellectual Property Systems," 5(3) Review of Law and Economics
22. Outterson, Kevin. 2009. "The Legal Ecology of Resistance: The Role of Antibiotic Resistance in Pharmaceutical Innovation," Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 09-48, Oct. 2009 (Cardozo Law Review, forthcoming).
23. Parchomovsky, Gideon, and R. Polk Wagner. 2005. "Patent Portfolios," 154 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1.
24. Posner, Eric. 2003. "Economic Analysis of Contract Law After Three Decades: Success or Failure?" 112 Yale Law Journal 829.
25. Scotchmer, Suzanne. 1991. "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and Patent Law," 5 Journal of Economic Perspectives 29.
26. Strandburg, Katherine J. 2005. "Curiosity-Driven Research and University Technology Transfer," in G.D. Libecap, ed. ADVANCES IN THE STUDY OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP, INNOVATION, AND ECONOMIC GROWTH - Volume16: University Entrepreneurship and Technology, chapter 5. Elsevier Science/JAL Press, available at: http://works.bepress.com/katherine
27. -. 2008. "Users as Innovators: Implications for Patent Doctrine," 79 University of Colorado Law Review 467.
28. -. 2009. "Evolving Innovation Paradigms and the Global Intellectual Property Regime," 41 Connecticut Law Review 861.