Population size and rates of language change

Human Biology

Volumn 81, Issue 2-3, 2009, Pages 259-274

  Wichmann, Søren ^a,b   Holman, Eric W ^c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY   (Germany)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated Similarity Judgment Program (ASJP); Language evolution; Language size; Levenshtein distance; Lexicostatistics; World Atlas of Language Structures (WALS)

Indexed keywords

EID: 73649100301     PISSN: 00187143     EISSN: 15346617     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3378/027.081.0308     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Barabási, L. A., and R. Albert. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509-512.
2. Brown, C. H., E. W. Holman, S. Wichmann et al. 2008. Automated classifi cation of the world's languages: A description of the method and preliminary results. STUF Lang. Typol. Universals 61:285-308.
3. Chamberlain, A. 2009. Archaeological demography. Hum. Biol. 81(2-3):275-286 (this issue).
4. Cohen, J. 1992. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112:155-159.
5. Cysouw, M. 2009. Quantitative explorations of the worldwide distribution of rare characteristics, or the exceptionality of northwestern European languages. In Expecting the Unexpected: Exceptions in Grammar, H. Simon and H. Wiese, eds. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (in press).
6. Dryer, M. S. 2005a. Genealogical language list. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil et al., eds. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 584-643.
7. Dryer, M. S. 2005b. Order of subject, object, and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil et al., eds. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 334-337.
8. Gordon, R. G., Jr., ed. 2005. Ethnologue, 15th ed. Dallas: SIL International.
9. Haspelmath, M., M. Dryer, D. Gil et al., eds. 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
10. Heeringa, W. 2004. Measuring Dialect Pronunciation Differences Using Levenshtein Distance. Ph.D. dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
11. Henrich, J. 2004. Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses-The Tasmanian case. Am. Antiq. 69:197-214.
12. Holman, E. W., C. Schulze, D. Stauffer et al. 2007. On the relation between structural diversity and geographical distance among languages: Observations and computer simulations. Linguist. Typol. 11:395-423.
13. Holman, E. W., S. Wichmann, C. H. Brown et al. 2008. Explorations in automated language comparison. Fol. Linguist. 42:331-354.
14. Ke, J., T. Gong, and W. S.-Y. Wang. 2008. Language change and social networks. Commun. Computat. Phys. 3:935-949.
15. Levenshtein, V. I. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Cybernet. Control Theor. 10:707-710.
16. Müller, A., V. Velupillai, S. Wichmann et al. 2009. ASJP World Language Tree: Version 1 (April 2009). Available at http://email.eva.mpg.de/ ∼wichmann/ASJPHomePage.htm.
17. Nerbonne, J., and W. Heeringa. 2007. Geographic distributions of linguistic variation refl ect dynamics of differentiation. In Roots: Linguistics in Search of Its Evidential Base, S. Featherston and W. Sternefeld, eds. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 267-297.
18. Nettle, D. 1999a. Is the rate of linguistic change constant? Lingua 108:119-136.
19. Nettle, D. 1999b. Linguistic diversity of the Americas can be reconciled with a recent colonization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:3325-3329.
20. Nettle, D. 1999c. Using social impact theory to simulate language change. Lingua 108:95-117.
21. Nichols, J. 1995. Diachronically stable structural features. In Historical Linguistics 1993: Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, H. Andersen, ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 337-355.
22. Nichols, J., and T. Warnow. 2008. Tutorial on computational linguistic phylogeny. Lang. Linguist. Compass 2:760-820.
23. Nowak, A., J. Szamrej, and B. Latané. 1990. From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamical theory of social impact. Psychol. Rev. 97:362-376.
24. Powell, A., S. Shennan, and M. G. Thomas. 2009. Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science 324:1298-1301.
25. Richerson, P. J., R. Boyd, and R. L. Bettinger. 2009. Cultural innovations and demographic change. Hum. Biol. 81(2-3):211-235 (this issue).
26. Serva, M., and F. Petroni. 2008. Indo-European languages tree by Levenshtein distance. Europhys. Lett. 81(6):68005. Available at http://www.iop.org/EJ/journal/EPL.
27. Shennan, S. J. 2000. Population, culture history, and the dynamics of culture change. Curr. Anthropol. 41:811-835.
28. Swadesh, M. 1950. Salish internal relationships. Intl. J. Am. Linguist. 16:157-167.
29. Swadesh, M. 1955. Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating. Intl. J. Am. Linguist. 21:121-137.
30. Trudgill, P. 1974. Linguistic change and diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language Soc. 3:215-246.
31. Watts, D. J., and S. H. Strogatz. 1998. Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393:440-442.
32. Wichmann, S., and E. W. Holman. 2009. Temporal Stability for Linguistic Typological Features. Munich: LINCOM Europa (in press). Prepublication version available at http://email.eva.mpg.de/∼wichmann/WichmannHolmanIniSubmit.pdf.
33. Wichmann, S., D. Stauffer, C. Schulze et al. 2008. Do language change rates depend on population size? Adv. Complex Syst. 11(3):1-13.