Observer accuracy in the detection of pulmonary nodules on CT: effect of cine frame rate

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 133-136

  Copley, S J ^a   Bryant, T H ^b   Chambers, A A ^c   Harvey, C J ^a   Hodson, J M ^d   Graham, A ^a   Lynch, M J ^e   Paley, M R ^a   Partridge, W J ^d   Rangi, P ^f   Schmitz, S ^g   Win, Z ^a   Todd, J J ^h   Desai, S R ⁱ  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b STOBHILL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c NORTHWICK PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d PRINCESS ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e KINGSTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g Gemeinschaftspraxis für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin ^*  (Germany)

^h East Suffolk and North Essex Foundation Trust   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ KING'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IOHEXOL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; LUNG METASTASIS; LUNG NODULE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; TUMOR VOLUME;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 73649099098     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.05.016     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Edwards A.J., Ricketts C., Dubbins P.A., Roobottom C.A., and Wells I.P. The effect of reporting speed on plain film reporting errors. Clin Radiol 58 (2003) 971-979
2. Kundel H.L., and Nodine C.F. Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. Radiology 116 (1975) 527-532
3. Seltzer S.E., Judy P.F., Adams D.F., et al. Spiral CT of the chest: comparison of cine and film-based viewing. Radiology 197 (1995) 73-78
4. Tillich M., Kammerhuber F., Reittner P., Reipl T., Stoeffler G., and Szolar D.H. Detection of pulmonary nodules with helical CT: comparison of cine and film-based viewing. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169 (1997) 1611-1614
5. Awai K., Murao K., Ozawa A., et al. Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection performance. Radiology 230 (2004) 347-352
6. Carmody D.P., Nodine C.F., and Kundel H.L. An analysis of perceptual and cognitive factors in radiographic interpretation. Perception 9 (1980) 339-344
7. Gur D., Good W.F., Oliver J.H., et al. Sequential viewing of abdominal CT images at varying rates. Radiology 191 (1994) 119-122
8. Leader J.K., Warfel T.E., Fuhrman C.R., et al. Pulmonary nodule detection with low-dose CT of the lung: agreement among radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 (2005) 973-978
9. SG3 A., McNitt-Gray M.F., Reeves A.P., et al. The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC): an evaluation of radiologist variability in the identification of lung nodules on CT scans. Acad Radiol 14 (2007) 1409-1421
10. Armato S.G., Roberts R.Y., Kocherginsky M., et al. Assessment of radiologist performance in the detection of pulmonary nodules: dependence on the definition of "truth". Acad Radiol 16 (2009) 28-38
11. Gruden J.F., Ouanounou S., Tigges S., Norris S.D., and Klausner T.S. Incremental benefit of maximum-intensity-projection images on observer detection of small pulmonary nodules revealed by multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 149-157
12. Janowski A., Martinelli T., Timsit J.F., et al. Pulmonary nodule detection on MDCT images: evaluation of diagnostic performance using thin axial images, maximum intensity projections and computer-aided detection. Eur Radiol 17 (2007) 3148-3156
13. Peloschek P., Sailer J., and Weber M. Pulmonary nodules: sensitivity of maximum intensity projection versus that of volume rendering for 3D multidetector CT data. Radiology 243 (2007) 561-569
14. MacMahon H. Advanced image processing and computer-aided diagnosis: are we there yet?. J Thorac Imaging 23 (2008) 75-76