Neutrino mass differences and nonunitarity of neutrino mixing matrix from interfering recoil ions

Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics

Volumn 6, Issue 22, 2009, Pages 107-122

  Kleinert, H ^a,b   Kienlecd, P ^c,d  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b ICRANET   (Italy)

^c STEFAN MEYER INSTITUTE FOR SUBATOMIC PHYSICS   (Austria)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Interfering recoil ions; Neutrino mass and mixing; Weak interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 73649096767     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17295254     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. 142Pm ions, Phys. Lett. B 664, 162 (2008) (nucl-ex/0801.2079).
2. M. Jung, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 2164;
3. F. Bosch, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 5190;
4. T. Ohtsubo, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 052501.
5. W.-M. Yao, et al., J. Phys. G 33, 156, 471 (2006). See also
6. G. Fogli, et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57, 71 (2006); 742 (2006).
7. B. Pontecorvo, Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 429 (1957) [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33, 549 (1957)];
8. S. M. Bilenky and B. Pontecorvo, Phys. Rept. 41, 225 (1978).
9. L.Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2369 (1978);
10. S.P. Mikheev and A. Yu. Smirnov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42, 913 (1985);
11. C. Giunti, C. W. Kim and U. W. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 44, 3635 (1991).
12. M. Blasone and G. Vitiello, Annals Phys. 244, 283 (1995);
13. M. Blasone, P. Pacheco, Braz. J. Phys. 35, 447 (2005).
14. The right-hand superscript indicates the ionization degree of the associated atom
15. -16 eV.
16. See the upper allowed region in Fig. 4 of the KamLAND data in T. Araki et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 081801 (2005).
17. The same difference was found in the analysis of H. Lipkin, New method for studying neutrino mixing and mass differences, (hep-ph/0801.1465) and in the corrected version 3 of the preprint by (arXiv:0801.2121,arXiv:0803.1289). See also A.N. Ivanov and P. Kienle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 062502 (2009).
18. A.N. Ivanov, E.L. Kryshen, M. Pitschmann, P. Kienle, (arXiv:0804.1311)
19. M.L. Goldberger and K.M. Watson, Collision Theory, John Wiley, New York, 1964.
20. See for instance H. Abele, E. Barberio, D. Dubbers, F. Glueck, J.C. Hardy, W.J. Marciano, A. Serebrov, N. Severijns (hep-ph/0312150);
21. H. Abele, M. Astruc Hoffmann, S. Bäßler, D. Dubbers, F. Glck, U. Müller1, V. Nesvizhevsky, J. Reich, and O. Zimmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 211801 (2002)
22. B. Holdom, W.S. Hou, T. Hurth, M.L. Mangano, S. Sultansoy, G. Ünel (arXiv:0904.4698);
23. İ.T. Çaki{dotless}r, H. Duran Yi{dotless}ldi{dotless}z, O. Çaki{dotless}r, G. Ünel (arXiv:0908.0123);
24. I.T. Çakir, H. Duran Yildiz, O. Çakir, G. Ünel (arXiv:0908.0123);
25. Z. Murdock, S. Nandi, Z. Tavartkiladze, Phys. Lett. B 668, 303 (2008);
26. P.Q. Hung and M. Sher, Phys. Rev. D 77, 037302 (2008);
27. T. Çuhadar-Dönszelmann, M. Karagöz Ünel, V. E. Özcan, S. Sultansoy, G. Ünel, JHEP 10, 74 (2008) (arXiv:0806.4003);
28. G.D. Kribs, T. Plehn, M. Spannowsky, and T.M.P. Tait, Phys. Rev. D 76, 075016 (2007);
29. R. Fok, G.D. Kribs (arXiv:0803.4207);
30. B. Holdom, Phys. Lett. B 666, 77 (2008) (arXiv:0805.1965);
31. JHEP 8, 69 (2007) (arXiv:0705.1736);
32. JHEP 3, 63 (2007) (hep-ph/0702037);
33. V.A. Novikov, L.B. Okun, A.N. Rozanov and M.I. Vysotsky (hep-ph/0203132);
34. H.-J. He, N. Polonsky, Shufang Su, Phys. Rev. D 64, 053004 (2001).
35. C. Giunti, Comment on 'A neutrino's wobble?' , (arXiv:0807.3818);
36. Rates of Processes with Coherent Production of Different Particles and the GSI Time Anomaly (arXiv:0805.0431);
37. Comment on the Neutrino-Mixing Interpretation of the GSI Time Anomaly, Phys. Lett B 663, 92 (2008) (arXiv:0801.4639).
38. H. Kienert, J. Kopp, M. Lindner, A. Merle, The GSI anomaly, (arXiv:0808.2389).
39. M. Peshkin, Comment on "New method for studying neutrino mixing and mass differences", (arXiv:0804.4891);
40. Unitarity Constraint upon Kinematical Analyses of the GSI Time-Modulated Radioactive Decay Experiment Authors: Murray Peshkin, (arXiv:0803.0935).
41. A. Gal, Neutrinos do not oscillate yet at GSI , (arXiv:0809.1213).
42. H. Burkhardt, J. Lowe, G.J. Stephenson Jr., T. Goldman and B.H.J. McKellar, Oscillations in the GSI electron capture experiment, (arXiv:0804.1099).
43. A.G. Cohen, S.L. Glashow, Z. Ligeti, Disentangling Neutrino Oscillations, (arXiv:0810.4602).
44. The author of Refs. [16] and [17] suggest the existence of two closely lying nuclear states whose beats are observed.
45. μ were proposed by Y.N. Srivastava, A. Widom. and E. Sassaroli, Zeitschr. Phys C 66, 601 (1995) (hepph/ 9509261), (hep-ph/9807543), and in further publications by the first two authors in (hep-ph/9707268), (hep-ph/9612290).
46. They were disputed by A.D. Dolgov, A.Y. Morozov, L.B. Okun, M.G. Schepkin, Nucl.Phys. B 502, 3 (1997) (hep-ph/9703241)
47. See also H. Burkhardt, J. Lowe, and G. J. Stephenson, Jr., Phys. Rev. D 59, 054018 (1999).
48. Oscillations of the Λ paticles in the associate production with neutral Kaons were proposed by Y.N. Srivastava, A. Widom. and E. Sassaroli, Phys. Lett. B 344, 436 (1995)
49. adn disputed by J. Lowe, B. Bassalleck, H. Burkhardt, A. Rusek, G.J. Stephenson, and T. Goldman, Physics Letters B 384, 288 (1996).