Illuminative evaluation of user education programmes

Aslib Proceedings

Volumn 29, Issue 10, 1977, Pages 348-362

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73549114962     PISSN: 0001253X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1108/eb050610     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Brewer, J. G. and Hills, P. J. Evaluation of reader instruction. Libri 26 (I), 1977, p. 55—65.
2. Fjallbrant, N.Evaluation in a user instruction programme. J. Librarianship 9 (2), Apri 1 1977, p. 83-95-
3. Brewer, J. G. and Hills, P. J. Op. cit., p. 61.
4. Stevenson, M. H. Education in the use of information in university and academic environments. Aslib Proceedings 28 (1), January 1976, p. 19.
5. Parlett, M.and hamilton, d.Illuminative evaluation: a new approach to the study of innovatory programs. University of Edinburgh Centre for Research in the Educational Sciences, Occasional Paper No. 9. Later reprinted as 'Evaluation as illumination’ in tawney, d. (ed) Curriculum evaluation today: trends and implications. London: Macmillan for the Schools Council, 1976, p. 84–101.
6. Fjallbrant, N. op. cit., p. 86–87.
7. See, for example, caro, f. g.(ed.) Readings in evaluation research. Russell Sage Foundation, 1977; and guttentag, m.and struening, e. l. (eds) Handbook of evaluation research. Sage, 1975.
8. Harlen, W. Change and development in evaluation strategy. In tawney, d.op. cit., p. 35.
9. Trow, M. Methodological problems in the evaluation of innovation. In caro, f. g.op. cit., 81–94.
10. Parlett, M. and Hamilton, D. op. cit. In TAWNEY, D., op. cit. p. 89.
11. Cooper, K. Curriculum evaluation: definitions and boundaries. In tawney, d.op. cit. p. 5.
12. Eraut, M. Some recent evaluation studies of curriculum projects—a review. In tawney, d.op. cit., p. 34–83.
13. Steadman, S. Techniques of evaluation. In tawney, d.op. cit., p. 34–83.
14. Hamilton, D. Curriculum evaluation. Open Books, 1976.
15. Guttentag, M. Models and methods in evaluation research. Journal for the theory of social behavior 1, 1971, p. 75—95.
16. Steadman S. Op. cit.
17. Tawney, D. Evaluation information for decision makers. In op. cit., p. 20.
18. Parsons, C. The new evaluation: a cautionary note. J. Curriculum studies 8 (2), 1976, p. 123–138.
19. Shipman, M. The organisation and impact of social research. Routledge, 1976, p. 147.
20. Guttentag, M. Op. Cit., p. 76.
21. Stake, R. E. The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record 68 (7), April 1967, p. 523–540.
22. Stake, R.E. Evaluation design, instrumentation, data collection, and analysis of data. In Educational evaluation. Columbus, Ohio. State Superintendent of Public Instruction, 1969, p. 61.
23. Stake, R.E. The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record 68 (7), April 1967, p. 529.