|
Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1074-1076
|
Perceptions and attitudes towards different grading systems from clinical guidelines developers
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACETORPHAN;
ACUTE DIARRHEA;
CLINICAL EVALUATION;
CLINICAL PROTOCOL;
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEALTH SURVEY;
HUMAN;
LETTER;
MEDICAL SOCIETY;
METHODOLOGY;
MEXICO;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
QUALITY CONTROL;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
EDUCATION;
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE;
HUMANS;
MEXICO;
PERCEPTION;
PHYSICIANS;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;
REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;
|
EID: 73549096199
PISSN: 13561294
EISSN: 13652753
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01319.x Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (6)
|