Use of CALPUFF for exposure assessment in a near-field, complex terrain setting

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 262-270

  MacIntosh, David L ^a   Stewart, James H ^a   Myatt, Theodore A ^a   Sabato, Joseph E ^a   Flowers, George C ^b   Brown, Kirk W ^c   Hlinka, Dennis J ^d   Sullivan, David A ^d  

^a Environmental Health & Engineering Inc   (United States)

^b Tulane University   (United States)

^c SI Group LP   (United States)

^d Sullivan Environmental Consulting Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

CALPUFF; Deposition; Exposure; Near field

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE PREDICTION; AIR CONCENTRATIONS; AIR POLLUTANTS; AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION; ATTIC DUST; AVERAGE CONCENTRATION; CALPUFF; COMPLEX TERRAINS; DISCRETE SOURCES; EXPOSURE ANALYSIS; EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT; HEALTH-STUDY; HEAVY METALS IN SOIL; KNOWLEDGE GAPS; LINEAR FUNCTIONS; METEOROLOGICAL CONDITION; NEAR-FIELD; POINT-BY-POINT ANALYSIS; REGULATORY APPLICATIONS; RELIABLE MODELS; SOIL SAMPLE; SOURCE-RECEPTOR; U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; WIND CONDITIONS;

AIR POLLUTION; CADMIUM; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); DEPOSITION; DUST; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; FORECASTING; HEALTH RISKS; LANDFORMS; LEAD; ODOR CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SOIL SURVEYS; SOILS; ZINC;

SOIL POLLUTION;

ARSENIC; CADMIUM; LEAD; ZINC;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; CADMIUM; COMPLEX TERRAIN; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DEPOSITION; HEALTH RISK; LEAD; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOPOGRAPHIC EFFECT; ZINC;

ACCURACY; AMBIENT AIR; ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION; ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION; DUST; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; POLLUTION MONITORING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL ANALYSIS;

EID: 73549085619     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.09.023     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Chang J.C., Franzese P., et al. Evaluations of CALPUFF, HPAC, and VLSTRACK with two mesoscale field datasets. Journal of Applied Meteorology 42 4 (2001) 453-466
2. Davis J.J., and Gulson B.L. Ceiling (attic) dust: a "museum" of contamination and potential hazard. Environmental Research 99 2 (2005) 177-194
3. Dockery D.W., Pope III C.A., et al. An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. N Engl J Med 329 24 (1993) 1753-1759
4. Hurley P.J., and Luhar A.K. An evaluation and inter-comparison of AUSPLUME, CALPUFF, and TAPM - part 1: the Kincaid and Indianapolis datasets. Clean Air & Environmental Quality 39 1 (2005) 39-45
5. Hurley P.J., and Luhar A.K. An evaluation and inter-comparison of AUSPLUME, CALPUFF, and TAPM - Part 2: Angelsea and Kwinana datasets. Clean Air & Environmental Quality 39 1 (2005) 46-51
6. Irwin J.S. A Comparison of CALPUFF Modeling Results With 1997 INEL Field Data Results. Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application, XII (1997) (S.E. Gyrning and F.A. Schiermeier. New York, Plenum Press)
7. Irwin J.S., Scire J.S., et al. A Comparison of CALPUFF Modeling Results With CAPTEX Field Data Results. Air Pollution Modeling and its Application, XI (1996) (S.E. Gyrning and F.A. Schiermeier. New York, Plenum Press)
8. Jacko R.B., and Neuendorf D.G. Trace metal particulate emission test results from a number of industrial and municipal point sources. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 27 10 (1977) 989-994
9. Jiang G., Lamb B., et al. Using back trajectories and process analysis to investigate photochemical ozone production in the Puget Sound region. Atmospheric Environment 37 (2003) 1489-1502
10. Lioy P.J., Freeman N.C., et al. Dust: a metric for use in residential and building exposure assessment and source characterization. Environ Health Perspect 110 10 (2002) 969-983
11. Lorber M., Eschenroeder A., et al. Testing the USEPA's ISCST-Version 3 model on dioxins: a comparison of predicted and observed air and soil concentrations. Atmospheric Environment 34 23 (2000) 3995-4010
12. MacIntosh D.L., Kabiru C., et al. Longitudinal investigation of exposure to arsenic, cadmium, chromium and lead via beverage consumption. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 10 2 (2000) 196-205
13. Matthewson C.H. Zinc: The Science and Technology of the Metal, Its Alloys and Compounds (1959), Reinhold Publishing, New York
14. MHC. Annual Reports, Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Company (1951-1971), Northern Illinois University, Regional History Center, Dekalb, IL
15. Pfender W., Graw R., et al. Use of a complex air pollution model to estimate dispersal and deposition of grass stem rust urediniospores at landscape scale. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 139 (2006) 138-153
16. Pfender W., Graw R., et al. Emission rates, survival, and modeled dispersal of viable pollen of creeping bentgrass. Crop Science 47 (2007) 2529-2539
17. Poor N., Pollman C., et al. Nature and magnitude of atmospheric fluxes of total inorganic nitrogen and other inorganic species to the Tampa Bay Watershed, FL, USA. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 170 (2006) 267-283
18. San Jose R., Perez J., et al. The evaluation of the air quality impacts of an incinerator by using MM5-CMAQ-EMIMO modeling system: North of Spain case study. Environment International 34 5 (2008) 714-719
19. Schrenk H.H., Heimann H., et al. Air Pollution in Donora, PA: Epidemiology of the Unusual Smog Episode of October 1948. Public Health Bulletin (1949), Public Health Service, Washington, D.C
20. Selin N., and Jacob D. Seasonal and spatial patterns of mercury wet deposition in the United States: constraints on the contribution from North American anthropogenic sources. Atmospheric Environment 42 21 (2008) 5193-5204
21. Strimaitis D.G., Scire J.S., et al. Evaluation of the CALPUFF Dispersion Model with Two Power Plant Data Sets. Tenth Joint Conference on the Application of Air Pollution Meteorology (1998), American Meteorological Society, Phoenix
22. Tolbert P.E., Mulholland J.A., et al. Air quality and pediatric emergency room visits for asthma in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Am J Epidemiol 151 8 (2000) 798-810
23. USEPA. Secondary Zinc Industry Emission Control Problem Definition Study, Part 1 - Technical Study (1971), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, Air Pollution Control Office
24. USEPA. Industrial Process Profiles for Environmental Use, Primary Zinc Industry (1980), Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, U.S.
25. USEPA. Industrial Process Profiles for Environmental Use: Chapter 28 Primary Zinc Industry (1980), Cincinnati, Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26. USEPA. A Comparison of CALPUFF Modeling Results to Two Tracer Field Experiments. Research Triangle Park, NC (1998), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
27. USEPA. User's Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model - AERMOD (2002), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC
28. USEPA. 40 CFR Part 51 Revision to the Guideline on air quality models: adoption of a Preferred General Purpose (Flat and complex terrain) dispersion model and other Revisions; Final Rule. U.S.E.P. Agency. Federal Register 70 No. 216 (2005)
29. USEPA. (2007). "Mid-Atlantic superfund: spelter smelter." Retrieved January 28, 2008, from http://www.epa.gov/reg3hscd/super/sites/WV0000634584/index.htm.
30. USEPA. Clarification of regulatory status of CALPUFF for near-field applications (2008), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC
31. Vitt D.H., Wieder K., et al. Response of Sphagnum fuscum to nitrogen deposition: a case study of ombrogenous peatlands in Alberta, Canada. The Bryologist 106 2 (2003) 235-245