Equivalence testing: A brief review

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 257-258

  Castura, John C ^a  

^a Compusense Inc ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73449134088     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.12.002     Document Type: Note

References (27)

1. Anderson S., and Hauck W.W. A new procedure for testing equivalence in comparative bioavailability and other clinical trials. Communications in Statistics - Theory Methods 12 (1983) 2663
2. Bartoshuk L.M. Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: Recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception. Chemical Senses 25 (2000) 447-460
3. Berger R.L., and Hsu J.C. Bioequivalence trails, intersection-union tests and equivalence confidence sets (with discussion). Statistical Science 11 (1996) 283-319
4. Bi J. Letter to the editor: Jian Bi replies as follows. Food Quality and Preference 19 3 (2008) 344-346
5. Bi J. Similarity testing in sensory and consumer research. Food Quality and Preference 16 2 (2005) 139-149
6. Bi J. Similarity testing using paired comparison method. Food Quality and Preference 18 3 (2007) 500-507
7. Boring E.G. Mathematical vs. scientific significance. Psychological Bulletin 16 10 (1919) 335-338
8. Boyles R.A. The role of likelihood in interval estimation. The American Statistician 62 1 (2008) 22-26
9. Brockhoff P.B., and Christensen R.H.B. Thurstonian models for sensory discrimination tests as generalized linear models. Food Quality and Preference (2009) 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.04.003
10. Brown L.D., Hwang J.T.G., and Munk A. An unbiased test for the bioequivalence problem. The Annals of Statistics 25 6 (1997) 2345-2367
11. Dalton P., Doolittle N., and Breslin P.A.S. Gender-specific induction of enhanced sensitivity to odors. Nature Neuroscience 5 3 (2002) 199-200
12. Efron B. R.A. Fisher in the 21st century. Statistical Science 13 2 (1998) 95-122
13. Ennis D.M. Letter to the editor: Response to: Bi, J. (2007). Similarity testing using paired comparison method. Food Quality and Preference 18 (2008) 500-507 Food Quality and Preference, 19(3), 344
14. Ennis D.M. Letter to the editor: Rejoinder to Bi and Meyners. Food Quality and Preference 19 3 (2008) 347-348
15. Ennis D.M., and Ennis J.M. Hypothesis testing for equivalence based on symmetric open intervals. Communications in Statistics - Theory Methods 38 11 (2009) 1792-1803
16. Ennis D.M., and Ennis J.M. Equivalence hypothesis testing. Food Quality and Preference 21 (2009) 253-256
17. Kamerud J.K., and Delwiche J.F. Individual differences in perceived bitterness predict liking of sweeteners. Chemical Senses 32 (2007) 803-810
18. Meyners M. Least equivalent allowable differences in equivalence testing. Food Quality and Preference 18 3 (2007) 541-547
19. Meyners M. Letter to the editor: Comment on the letters by D.M. Ennis and J. Bi. Food Quality and Preference 19 3 (2008) 346
20. Murphy C. Age-related effects on the threshold, psychophysical function, and pleasantness of menthol. Journal of Gerontology 38 2 (1983) 217-222
21. Perlman M.D., and Wu L. The emperor's new tests. Statistical Science 14 4 (1999) 355-381
22. Prescott J., and Stevenson R.J. Effects of oral chemical irritation on tastes and flavors in frequent and infrequent users of chili. Physiology and Behavior 58 6 (1995) 1117-1127
23. Schuirmann D.J. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalent of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetic and Biopharmaceutics 15 (1987) 657-680
24. Stevens J.C., Cain W.S., and Burke R.J. Variability of olfactory thresholds. Chemical Senses 13 (1988) 643-653
25. Westlake W.J. Response to T.B.L. Kirkwood: Bioequivalence testing - A need to rethink. Biometrics 37 (1981) 589-594
26. Zhao L., and Tepper B.J. Perception and acceptance of selected high-intensity sweeteners and blends in model soft drinks by propylthiouracil (PROP) non-tasters and super-tasters. Food Quality and Preference 18 3 (2007) 531-540
27. Zhou J., and Yuan Y. Comparison of Schuirmann's two one-sided tests with nonparametric two one-sided tests for non-normal data in clinical pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction studies. Online Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics 2 (2004) 1-12