A new non-intrusive technique for the construction of admissible stress fields in model verification

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 199, Issue 9-12, 2010, Pages 766-777

  Ladevèze, Pierre ^a,b   Chamoin, Ludovic ^a   Florentin, Éric ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Admissible stress field; Finite element method; Non intrusive techniques; Partition of unity method; Strict error bounds; Verification

Indexed keywords

ADMISSIBLE STRESS FIELD; ERROR BOUND; NON-INTRUSIVE TECHNIQUES; PARTITION OF UNITY METHODS; STRESS FIELD; STRICT ERROR BOUNDS;

STRESSES; TENSORS; TRACTION (FRICTION);

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 73449133715     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. P. Ladevèze, Comparison of models for continuum media, Thèse d'état, Université P. et M. Curie, Paris, 1975 (in French).
2. Babuška I., and Rheinboldt W.C. A posteriori error estimates for the finite element method. Int. J. Numer. Method Engrg. 12 (1978) 1597
3. Ladevèze P., and Leguillon D. Error estimate procedure in the finite element method and application. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 20 3 (1983) 485-509
4. Verfürth R. A Review of a Posteriori Error Estimation and Adaptive Mesh-refinement Techniques (1996), Wiley-Teubner, Stuttgart
5. Babuška I., and Strouboulis T. The Finite Element Method and its Reliability (2001), Oxford University Press
6. In: Stein E. (Ed). Error-Controlled Adaptive Finite Elements in Solid Mechanics (2003), J. Wiley
7. Ladevèze P., and Pelle J.-P. Mastering Calculations in Linear and Nonlinear Mechanics (2004), Springer, NY
8. Paraschivoiu M., Peraire J., and Patera A.T. A posteriori finite element bounds for linear functional outputs of elliptic partial differential equations. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Engrg. 150 (1997) 289-312
9. Rannacher R., and Suttmeier F.T. A feedback approach to error control in finite element methods: application to linear elasticity. Comput. Mech. 19 (1997) 434-446
10. Cirak F., and Ramm E. A posteriori error estimation and adaptivity for linear elasticity using the reciprocal theorem. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Engrg. 156 (1998) 351-362
11. Peraire J., and Patera A.T. Bounds for linear-functional outputs of coercive partial differential equations; local indicators and adaptive refinements. In: Ladevèze, and Oden (Eds). Advances in Adaptive Computational Methods in Mechanics (1998), Elsevier 199-216
12. Ladevèze P., Rougeot P., Blanchard P., and Moreau J.P. Local error estimators for finite element linear analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 176 (1999) 231-246
13. Prudhomme S., and Oden J.T. On goal-oriented error estimation for elliptic problems: application to the control of pointwise errors. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Engrg. 176 (1999) 313-331
14. Strouboulis T., Babuška I., Datta D., Copps K., and Gangaraj S.K. A posteriori estimation and adaptive control of the error in the quantity of interest - Part 1: A posteriori estimation of the error in the Von Mises stress and the stress intensity factors. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Engrg. 181 (2000) 261-294
15. Becker R., and Rannacher R. An optimal control approach to shape a posteriori error estimation in finite element methods. In: Isereles A. (Ed). Acta Numerica vol. 10 (2001), Cambridge University Press 1-120
16. Wiberg N.E., and Diez P. Special issue. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Engrg. 195 4-6 (2006)
17. Beckers P., and Dufeu E. 3-D error estimation and mesh adaptation using improved R.E.P. method. Stud. Appl. Mech. 47 (1998) 413-426
18. Moitinho de Almeida J.P., and Almeida Pereira O.J.B. Upper bounds of the error in local quantities using equilibrated and compatible finite element solutions for linear elastic problems. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Engrg. 195 4-6 (2006) 279-296
19. Chamoin L., and Ladevèze P. A non-intrusive method for the calculation of strict and efficient bounds of calculated outputs of interest in linear viscoelasticity problems. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 9-12 (2008) 994-1014
20. Cottereau R., Diez P., and Huerta A. Strict error bounds for linear solid mechanics problems using a subdomain-based flux-free approach. Comput. Mech. 44 4 (2009) 533-547
21. J. Panetier, P. Ladevèze, L. Chamoin, Strict and effective bounds in goal-oriented error estimation applied to fracture mechanics problems solved with the XFEM, Int. J. Numer. Method Engrg., doi:10.1002/nme.2705.
22. Ladevèze P. Strict upper error bounds for calculated outputs of interest in computational structural mechanics. Comput. Mech. 42 2 (2008) 271-286
23. Ladevèze P., and Waeytens J. Model verification in dynamics through strict upper error bounds. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Engrg. 198 21-26 (2009) 1775-1784
24. Fraeijs de Veubeke B.M. Displacement and equilibrium models in the finite element method. In: Zienkiewicz, and Holister (Eds). Stress Analysis (1965), Wiley, London (Chap. 9)
25. Kempeneers M., Beckers P., Moitinho de Almeida J.P., and Pereira O.J.B.A. Modèles équilibre pour l'analyse duale. Revue Européenne des Éléments Finis 12 6 (2003) 737-760
26. Bank R.E., and Weiser A. Some a posteriori error estimators for elliptic partial differential equations. Math. Comput. 44 (1985) 283
27. Ainsworth M., and Oden J.T. A priori error estimators for second-order elliptic systems. Part 2: An optimal order process for calculating self-equilibrating fluxes. Comput. Math. Appl. 26 (1993) 75-87
28. Ladevèze P., and Maunder E.A.W. A general method for recovering equilibrating element tractions. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Engrg. 137 (1996) 111-151
29. Ladevèze P., and Maunder E.A.W. A general method for recovering equilibrating finite element tractions and stress fields for plates and solid elements. Comput. Assist. Mech. Engrg. Sci. 4 (1997) 533-548
30. Ladevèze P., and Rougeot P. New advances on a posteriori error on constitutive relation in finite element analysis. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Engrg. 150 (1997) 239-249
31. Florentin E., Gallimard L., and Pelle J.P. Evaluation of the local quality of stresses in 3D finite element analysis. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Engrg. 191 (2002) 4441-4457
32. Machiels L., Maday Y., and Patera A.T. A flux-free nodal Neumann subproblem approach to output bounds for partial differential equations. Comptes Rendus Académie des Sciences - Mécanique, Paris 330 1 (2000) 249-254
33. Carstensen C., and Funken S.A. Fully reliable localized error control in the FEM. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21 4 (2000) 1465-1484
34. Morin P., Nochetto R.H., and Siebert K.G. Local problems on stars: a posteriori error estimators, convergence, and performance. Math. Comput. 72 243 (2003) 1067-1097
35. Prudhomme S., Nobile F., Chamoin L., and Oden J.-T. Analysis of a subdomain-based error estimator for finite element approximations of elliptic problems. Numer. Method Partial Differ. Eq. 20 2 (2004) 165-192
36. Pares N., Diez P., and Huerta A. Subdomain-based flux-free a posteriori error estimators. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Engrg. 195 4-6 (2006) 297-323
37. Pares N., Santos H., and Diez P. Guaranteed energy error bounds for the Poisson equation using a flux-free approach: solving the local problems in subdomains. Int. J. Numer. Method Engrg. 79 10 (2009) 1203-1244
38. J.P. Moitinho de Almeida, E.A.W. Maunder, Recovery of equilibrium on star patches using a partition of unity technique, Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Engrg., in preparation.
39. P. Ladevèze, Verification of finite element calculations: a new non-intrusive technique for the computation of admissible stress fields, Internal Report No. 270, LMT-Cachan, 2008 (in French).
40. Babuška I., Strouboulis T., Upadhyay C.S., Gangaraj S.K., and Copps K. Validation of a posteriori error estimators by numerical approach. Int. J. Numer. Method Engrg. 37 (1994) 1073-1123
41. www.samtech.com.
42. Choi H.W., and Paraschivoiu M. Adaptive computations of a posteriori finite element output bounds: a comparison of the hybrid-flux approach and the flux-free approach. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Engrg. 193 36-38 (2004) 4001-4033