Relativistic thermodynamics with an invariant energy scale

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 80, Issue 12, 2009, Pages

  Das, Sudipta ^a   Ghosh, Subir ^a   Roychowdhury, Dibakar ^b  

^a INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH BENGAL   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73449121399     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.125036     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. G. Amelino-Camelia, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 418, 34 (2002); 10.1038/418034a (Pubitemid 34742560)
2. G. Amelino-Camelia Phys. Lett. B 510, 255 (2001); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00506-8
3. G. Amelino-Camelia Int. J. Mod. Phys. A IMPAEF 0217-751X 11, 35 (2002) arXiv:hep-th/0405273;
4. For a review on DSR, see J. Kowalski-Glikman, Lect. Notes Phys. 669, 131 (2005). LNPHA4 0075-8450 10.1007/11377306-5
5. J. Kowalski-Glikman and S. Nowak, Phys. Lett. B 539, 126 (2002); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02063-4
6. J. Kowalski-Glikman S. Nowak Classical Quantum Gravity CQGRDG 0264-9381 20, 4799 (2003). 10.1088/0264-9381/20/22/006 (Pubitemid 37470041)
7. S. Ghosh and P. Pal, Phys. Rev. D PRVDAQ 1550-7998 75, 105021 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.105021
8. For a very recent review on DSR related Quantum Gravity signatures and related issues, see G. Amelino-Camelia, arXiv:0806.0339;
9. Richard J. Szabo, arXiv:0906.2913.
10. Recent interest in Non-Commutative geometry and Quantum Field Theory was generated mainly by N. Seiberg and E. Witten, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 09 (1999) 032; 10.1088/1126-6708/1999/09/032
11. For reviews on Non-Commutative geometry inspired quantum physics, see M.R. Douglas and N.A. Nekrasov, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 977 (2001); RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.977 (Pubitemid 33395905)
12. R.J. Szabo, Phys. Rep. 378, 207 (2003). PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/S0370-1573(03)00059-0 (Pubitemid 36412384)
13. C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B442, 593 (1995); 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00150-Q
14. C. Rovelli L. Smolin Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B456, 734(E) (1995);
15. G. Amelino-Camelia, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17, 899 (2002). MPLAEQ 0217-7323 10.1142/S0217732302007612
16. D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. B 216, 41 (1989); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(89)91366-X
17. M. Maggiore, Phys. Lett. B 304, 65 (1993); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(93)91401-8
18. M. Maggiore Phys. Rev. D PRVDAQ 0556-2821 49, 5182 (1994); 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.5182
19. M. Maggiore Phys. Lett. B 319, 83 (1993); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(93)90785-G
20. L.J. Garay, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 10, 145 (1995); IMPAEF 0217-751X 10.1142/S0217751X95000085
21. S. Hossenfelder, M. Bleicher, S. Hofmann, J. Ruppert, S. Scherer, and H. Stoecker, Phys. Lett. B 575, 85 (2003); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb. 2003.09.040
22. S. Das and E.C. Vagenas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 221301 (2008). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.221301
23. S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen, and J.E. Roberts, Phys. Lett. B 331, 39 (1994). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(94)90940-7
24. J. Lukierski, A. Nowicki, H. Ruegg, and V.N. Tolstoy, Phys. Lett. B 264, 331 (1991); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(91)90358-W
25. S. Majid and H. Ruegg, Phys. Lett. B 334, 348 (1994); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(94)90699-8
26. J. Lukierski, H. Ruegg, and W.J. Zakrzewski, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) APNYA6 0003-4916 243, 90 (1995). 10.1006/aphy.1995.1092
27. J. Lukierski, H. Ruegg, and W.J. Zakrzewski, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) APNYA6 0003-4916 243, 90 (1995); 10.1006/aphy.1995.1092
28. J. Lukierski and A. Nowicki, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 7 (2003). IMPAEF 0217-751X 10.1142/S0217751X03013600
29. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 190403 (2002); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.190403
30. J. Magueijo L. Smolin Phys. Rev. D PRVDAQ 0556-2821 67, 044017 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.044017 (Pubitemid 44628030)
31. Alex Granik, arXiv:hep-th/0207113;
32. Alex Granik arXiv:physics/0108050;
33. Alex Granik arXiv:physics/0108031;
34. S. Mignemi Phys. Lett. A 316, 173 (2003); PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(03)01176-9
35. S. Mignemi Phys. Lett. B 672, 186 (2009); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.01.023
36. S. Ghosh and P. Pal, Phys. Lett. B 618, 243 (2005); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.05.018 (Pubitemid 40800194)
37. S. Ghosh, Phys. Lett. B 623, 251 (2005). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.07.055 (Pubitemid 41219186)
38. Alessandra Agostini, Giovanni Amelino-Camelia, Michele Arzano, Antonino Marcian, and Ruggero Altair Tacchi, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 22, 1779 (2007); MPLAEQ 0217-7323 10.1142/S0217732307024280
39. M. Daszkiewicz, J. Lukierski, and M. Woronowicz, Phys. Rev. D PRVDAQ 1550-7998 77, 105007 (2008); 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.105007
40. F. Girelli, T. Konopka, J. Kowalski-Glikman, and E.R. Livine, Phys. Rev. D PRVDAQ 1550-7998 73, 045009 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.045009
41. S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of General Theory of Relativity (John Wiley & Sons, U. K., 1972).
42. S. Judes and M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D PRVDAQ 0556-2821 68, 045001 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.045001 (Pubitemid 44641955)
43. N.R. Bruno, G. Amelino-Camelia, and J. Kowalski-Glikman, Phys. Lett. B 522, 133 (2001). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01264-3 (Pubitemid 33091830)
44. Our methodology requires some elaboration. The well-known "soccer ball problem" manifests itself when one wants to construct multiparticle states in DSR. Quite clearly (if energy is added linearly) the total energy of a multiparticle state, or a soccer ball, can exceed the energy upper bound (Planck energy). To cure this problem it has been suggested before, by J. Magueijo, Phys. Rev. D PRVDAQ 1550-7998 73, 124020 (2006), albeit in an ad-hoc way, that one should use the average energy of a bound state in the DSR transformations; 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.124020
45. On the other hand, S. Hossenfelder, Phys. Rev. D PRVDAQ 1550-7998 75, 105005 (2007), has proposed that in a field theoretic framework, it is more natural to consider energy or momentum densities which would solve the "soccer ball problem". 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.105005
46. S. Das and D. Roychowdhury (work in progress).