Preliminary re-evaluation of probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Chile: From Arica to Taitao Peninsula

Advances in Geosciences

Volumn 22, Issue , 2009, Pages 147-153

  Leyton, F ^a   Ruiz, S ^b   Sepulveda S A ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE TALCA   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COPING STRATEGY; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; EARTHQUAKE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; ESTIMATION METHOD; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; LOW VELOCITY ZONE; PEAK ACCELERATION; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC ZONE;

AISEN; ANDES; ARICA; ARICA AND PARINACOTA; CHILE; TAITAO PENINSULA;

EID: 73449121094     PISSN: 16807340     EISSN: 16807359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/adgeo-22-147-2009     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Algermissen, S. T. and D. M. Perkins: A probabilistic estimate of maximum acceleration in rock in the contiguous Unites State, US Geological Survey Open-File Report, 1976..
2. Algermissen, S. T., Kausel, E., Hanson, S., and Thenhaus, P. C.: Earthquake hazard in Chile, Rev. Geof́?sica, 37, 195-218, 1992..
3. Alvarez, M., Fischer, T., De la Llera, J. C., and Ridell, R.: Un modelo integrado para el ańalisis del riesgo ś?smico en edificios, VIII Jornadas Chilenas de Sismoloǵ?a e Ingenieŕ?a Antiś?smica, Valpara ́?so, Chile, 2002.
4. Araya, P.: Cat́alogo actualizado de intensidades ś?smicas para Chile, Dissertation for Civil Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, 2007.
5. Askew, B. and Algermissen, S. T.: Proyecto SISRA, Programa para la Mitigacíon de los Efectos de los Terremotos en la Regíon, 1985.
6. Astiz, L., Lay, T., and Kanamori, H.: Large intermediate-depth earthquakes and the subduction process, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 53, 80-166, 1988.
7. Astroza, M. and Monge, J.: Aumento de intensidades seǵun las caracter ́?sticas geoĺogicas del los suelos de fundacíon, sismo del 3 de marzo de 1985, Anales de la Universidad de Chile, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 1989.
8. Astroza, M., Moya, A., and Sanhueza, S.: Estudio comparativo de los efectos de los terremotos de Chilĺan de 1939 y de Talca de 1928, VIII Jornadas Chilenas de Sismoloǵ?a e Ingenieŕ?a Antis ́?smica, Valpará?so, Chile, 2002.
9. Astroza, M., Sandoval, M., and Kausel, E.: Estudio comparativo de los efectos de los sismos chilenos de subduccíon del tipo intraplaca de profundidad intermedia, IX Jornadas de Sismoloǵ?a e Ingenieŕ?a Antiś?smica, Concepcíon, Chile, 2005.
10. Barrientos, S.: Regionalizacíon ś?smica de Chile, Dissertation for MSc Geophysics, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 1980.
11. Barrientos, S.: Earthquakes in Chile, in: The Geology of Chile, edited by: Moreno, T. and Gibbons, W., Geological Society of London, 263-287, 2007.
12. Borcherdt, R. D.: Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification), Earthquake Spectra, 10, 617-653, 1994.
13. Castãnos, H. and Lomnitz, C.: PSHA: is it science?, Eng. Geol., 66, 315-317, 2002.
14. Cisternas, M., Atwater, B. F., Torrej́on, F., Sawai, Y., Machuca, G., Lagos, M., Eipert, A., Youlton, C., Salgado, I., Kamataki, T., Shishikura, M., Rajedran, C. P., Malik, J. K., Rizal, Y., and Husni, M.: Predecessors of the giant 1960 Chile earthquake, Nature, 437, 404-407, 2005.
15. Cornell, C. A.: Engineering seismic risk analysis, B. Seism. Soc. Am., 58, 1583-1606, 1968.
16. Cornell, C. A. and Winterstein, S. R.: Temporal and magnitude dependence in earthquake recurrence models, B. Seism. Soc. Am., 93, 314-331, 1988.
17. Field, E. H.: A modified ground-motion attenuation relationship for Southern California that accounts for detailed site classification and a basin-depth effect, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90, S209-S221, 2000.
18. Garć?a, D., Singh, S. K., Herŕaiz, M., Pacheco, F. J., and Ordaz, M.: Inslab earthquakes of central Mexico: Q, source spectra, and stress drop, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94, 789-802, 2005.
19. Greve, F.: Determinacíon del coeficiente de seguridad antiś?smico para diferentes zonas de Chile, Anales de la Facultad de Ciencias F́?sicas y Mateḿaticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 1948.
20. Gudmundsson, O. and Sambridge, M.: A regionalized upper mantle (RUM) seismic model, J. Geophys. Res., B4, 7121-7136, 1998.
21. Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C.: Frequency of earthquakes in California, B. Seism. Soc. Am., 34, 185-188, 1944.
22. ISC, International Seismological Centre: On-line Bulletin, online available at: http://www.isc.ac.uk, Internatl. Seis. Cent., Thatcham, UK, 2001.
23. Kanamori, H.: Rupture process of subduction-zone earthquakes, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 14, 293-322, 1986.
24. Kausel, E. and Campos, J.: The M/8.0 tensional earthquake of December 9, 1950 of northern Chile and its relation to the seismic potential of the region, Phys.Earth Planet. Int., 72, 220-235, 1992.
25. Khazaradze, G. and Klotz, J.: Short and long-term effects of GPS measured crustal deformation rates along the South-Central Andes, J. Geophys. Res., 108(B4), 1-13, 2003.
26. Khintchine, A. J.: Mathematical models in the theory of queuing, Griffin, London, 1960.
27. Labbe, J. C.: Relaciones macroś?smicas para la evaluacíon del riesgo ś?smico en Chile y California, Dissertation for Civil Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Sanitago, Chile, 1976.
28. Labbe, J. C. and Saragoni, G. R.: Sismicidad de Chile, Publicacíon SES I 7/76, Seccíon Estructuras, Depto, Obras Civiles, Fac. de Ciencias F́?sicas y Mateḿaticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 1976.
29. Leyton, F., Ruiz, J., Campos, J., and Kausel, E.: Intraplate and interplate earthquakes in Chilean subduction zone: A theoretical and observational comparison, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 175, 37-46, 2009a.
30. Leyton, F., Ruiz, S., and Seṕulveda, S.: Reevaluacíon del Peligro Ś?smico en Chile Central, Andean Geology, in press, 2009b.
31. Lomnitz, C.: An earthquake risk map of Chile, paper presented at 4th World Conference on Earthquake Eng, 1969.
32. Martin, A.: Hacia una nueva regionalizacíon y ćalculo del peligro ś?smico en Chile, Dissertation for Civil Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 1990.
33. Mattews, M. V., Ellsworth, W. L., and Reasenberg, P.: A Brownian model for recurrent earthquakes, B. Seism. Soc. Am., 92, 2233-2250, 2002.
34. Menke, W.: Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory, Academic Press, New York, 1989.
35. Moernaut, J., De Batist, M., Charlet, F., Heirman, K., Chapron, E., Pino, M., Brümmer, R., and Urrutia, R.: Giant earthquakes in Shouth-Central Chile revelead by Holocene mass-wasting events in Lake Puyehue, Sediment. Geol., 195, 239-256, 2007.
36. Musson, R. M. W., Toro, G. R., Coppersmith, K. J., Bommer, J. J., Deichmann, N., Bungum, H., Cotton, F., Scherbaum, F., Slejko, D., and Abrahamson, N. A.: Evaluating hazard results for Switzerland and how not to do it: A discussion of "Problems in the application of the SSHAC probability method for assessing earthquake hazards at Swiss nuclear power plants", edited by: Klügel, J.-U., Eng. Geol., 82, 43-55, 2005.
37. Page, R.: Aftershocks and microaftershocks, B. Seism. Soc. Am., 58, 1131-1168, 1968.
38. Reasenberg, P.: Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969-1982, B. Seism. Soc. Am., 90(B7), 5479-5495, 1985.
39. Romanoff, F.: Estudio del Peligro Ś?smico en la Regíon Metropolitana, Dissertation for Civil Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 1999.
40. Ruff, L. and Kanamori, H.: Seismicity and the subduction process, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 23, 240-252, 1980.
41. Ruiz, S. and Saragoni, G. R.: F́ormulas de atenuacíon para la subducci ́on de Chile considerando los dos mecanismos principales de sismogenesis y los efectos del suelo, IX Jornadas Chilenas de Sismoloǵ?a e Ingenieŕ?a Antiś?smica, Concepcíon, Chile, 2005.
42. Saragoni, G. R., Astroza, M., and Ruiz, S.: Comparative study of subduction earthquake ground motion of north, central and south America, paper presented at 13th World Conference on Earthquake Eng., Vancouver, Canada, 2004.
43. Sasorova, E. and Levin, B.: Peculiarity of the spatial and temporal distributions of seismic events in Andes (South America). paper presented at 4th Alexander von Humboldt International Conference, The Andes: Challenge for Geosciences, Santiago, Chile, 2008.
44. Scholz, C.: The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002.
45. Schwartz, D. P. and Coppersmith, K. J.: Fault behaviour and characteristic earthquake: examples from theWasatch and San Andreas fault zones, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 5681-5698, 1984.
46. Singh, S. K., Ordaz, M., Alćantara, L., Shapiro, N., Kostoglodov, V., Pacheco, J. F., Alcocer, S., Guitíerrez, C., Quass, R., Mikumo, T., and Ovando, E.: The Oaxaca earthquake of 30 septembre 1999 (Mw/7.5): A normal-fault event in the subducted Cocos Plate, Seism. Res. Lett., 71, 67-78, 2000.
47. Stepp, J. C.: An investigation on earthquake risk in the Puget Sound area by use of Type I Distribution of largest extremes, Dissertation for Ph. D., Pennsylvania State University, 1971.
48. Stepp, J. C.: Analysis of completeness of the earthquake sample in the Puget Sound area, NOAA Technical Report ERL 267-ESL 30, US Department of Commerce, Boulder, Colorado, 1973.
49. Uyeda, S. and Kanamori, H.: Back-arc opening and the mode of subduction, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 195-222, 1979.
50. Villablanca, R. and Riddell, R.: Evaluacíon del riesgo ś?smico en Chile, DIE, Departamento de Ingenieŕ?a Estructural, Universidad Cat́olica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 153 pp., 1985.
51. Wang, Z.-M., Woolery, E. W., Shi, B.-P., and Kiefer, J. D.: Communicating with uncertainty: A critical issue with probabilistic seismic hazrd analysis, EOS Trans. AGU, 84, 501-508, 2003.
52. Weichert, D. H.: Estiamtion of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal observation periods for different magnitudes, B. Seism. Soc. Am., 70, 1337-1346, 1980.
53. Wesnousky, S. G.: The Gutenberg-Richter or Characteristic earthquake distribution, which is it?, B. Seism. Soc. Am., 84, 1940- 1959, 1994.
54. Wessel, P. and Smith,W. H. F.: Free software helps map and display data, EOS Trans. AGU, 72, 445-446, 1991.
55. Wiemer, S. andWyss, M.: Minimum magnitude of complete reportting en earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan., B. Seism. Soc. Am., 90, 859-869, 2000.
56. Wu, S.-C., Cornell, C. A., and Winterstein, S. R.: A hybrid recurrence model and its application on seismic hazard results, B. Seism. Soc. Am., 85, 1-16, 1995.