Coupled shear-bending formulation for seismic analysis of stacked wood shear wall systems

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 38, Issue 14, 2009, Pages 1631-1647

  Pei, S ^a   van de Lindt, J W ^a  

^a Engineering Research Center and Hydraulics Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Hold down system; Light frame wood; Multi story light frame wood building; Numerical model; Shear bending coupled model; Stacked shear wall

Indexed keywords

BENDING (DEFORMATION); DIAPHRAGMS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PRESTRESSED MATERIALS; SEISMOLOGY; SHEAR DEFORMATION; SHEAR WALLS; WOOD; WOODEN BUILDINGS;

COUPLED MODELS; HOLD-DOWN SYSTEM; NUMERICAL MODELS; STACKED SHEAR WALL; WOOD BUILDINGS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; BENDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COUPLING; DEFORMATION; DIAPHRAGM WALL; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; HYSTERESIS; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; NUMERICAL MODEL; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SHAKING TABLE TEST; SHEAR; WOOD;

BENDING; DIAPHRAGMS; LIGHT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; WOOD;

EID: 73449113237     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.926     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Pang WC, Rosowsky DV. Direct displacement procedure for performance-based seismic design for multistory wood-frame structures. Report NW-02, NEESWood research project, 2007.
2. Pei S, van de Lindt JW. Methodology for earthquake-induced loss estimation: an application to wood-frame buildings. Structural Safety 2009; 31(1):31-42.
3. Collins M, Kasal B, Paevere P, Foliente GC. Three-dimensional model of light frame wood buildings I: model description. Journal of Structural Engineering 2005; 131(4):676-683.
4. Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc., ANSYS Theory Manual, Houston, PA, 2000. Available from: www.ansys.com.
5. Tarabia AM, Itani RY. Static and dynamic modeling of light-frame wood buildings. Computers and Structures 1997; 63(2):319-334.
6. Folz B, Filiatrault A. Seismic analysis of woodframe structures. I: model formulation. Journal of Structural Engineering 2004; 130(9):1353-1360.
7. CUREE project, 2000. Available from: http://www.curee.org/projects/woodframe/. Report series available from CUREE.
8. Folz B, Filiatrault A. Seismic analysis of woodframe structures. II: model implementation and verification. Journal of Structural Engineering 2004; 130(9):1361-1370.
9. Pei S, van de Lindt JW. SAPWood User's Manual. Released with SAPWood program, 2007. Available from: http://www.engr.colostate.edu/NEESWood/sapwood.html.
10. Martin Z, Skaggs TD, Keith EL. Full-scale 3D wall bracing tests. APA Report T2007-73, APA-the engineered wood association, Tacoma, WA, 2007.
11. Tyrell T. Full-Scale Three Dimensional Wood Structure Test Project, Gilb research laboratory, Simpson Strong-Tie Company, 2007. Detailed information available at: http://www.strongtie.com/news/industry/wall-bracing/3D-test/index.html. Accessed 15 October 2008.
12. Filiatrault A, Isoda H, Folz B. Hysteretic damping of wood framed buildings. Engineering Structures 2003; 25(4):461-471.
13. van de Lindt JW, Liu H. Nonstructural elements in performance-based seismic design of wood-frame structures. Journal of Structural Engineering 2007; 133(3):432-439.
14. Pang W, Rosowsky DV, Pei S, van de Lindt JW. Evolutionary parameter hysteretic model for wood shear walls. Journal of Structural Engineering 2007; 133(8):1118-1129.
15. Folz B, Filiatrault A. Cyclic analysis of wood shear walls. Journal of Structural Engineering 2001; 127(4): 433-441.
16. van de Lindt JW, Rosowsky DV, Filiatrault A, Symans MD, Davidson RA. The NEESWood project: progress on the development of a performance-based seismic design philosophy for mid-rise woodframe construction. Ninth World Conference on Timber Engineering, Portland, OR, 2006.