About the balancing principle for choice of the regularization parameter

Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization

Volumn 30, Issue 9-10, 2009, Pages 951-970

  Hamarik U ^a   Raus, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Balancing principle; Ill posed problem; Parameter choice; Regularization

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATE SOLUTION; ILL POSED PROBLEM; LINEAR ILL-POSED PROBLEMS; REGULARIZATION PARAMETERS; TIKHONOV METHOD;

EULER EQUATIONS;

EID: 73449110977     PISSN: 01630563     EISSN: 15322467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01630560903393139     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. F. Bauer and T. Hohage (2005). A Lepskij-type stopping rule for regularized Newton methods. Inverse Probl. 21:1975-1991.
2. F. Bauer, T. Hohage, and A. Munk (2009). Iteratively regularized Gauss-Newton method for nonlinear inverse problems with random noise. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47:1827-1846.
3. F. Bauer, P. Mathé, and S. Pereverzev (2007). Local solutions for inverse problems in geodesy. J. Geodesy 81:39-51.
4. F. Bauer and A. Munk (2007). Optimal regularization for ill-posed problems in metric spaces. J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 15:137-148.
5. F. Bauer and S. Pereverzev (2005). Regularization without preliminary knowledge of smoothness and error behavior. European J. Appl. Math. 16:303-317.
6. H. Cao and S. Pereverzev (2007). The balancing principle for the regularization of elliptic Cauchy problems. Inverse Probl. 23:1943-1961.
7. H. Cao, M. Klibanov, and S. Pereverzev (2009). A Carleman estimate and the balancing principle in the quasi-reversibility method for solving the Cauchy problem for the Laplace equation. Inverse Probl. 25:035005 (21 pp).
8. E. De Vito, S. Pereverzyev, and L. Rosasco (2009). Adaptive kernel methods using the balancing principle. Techreport of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT-CSAIL-TR-2008-062, 24 pp.
9. H. Gfrerer (1987). An a posteriori parameter choice for ordinary and iterated Tikhonov regularization of ill-posed problems leading to optimal convergence rates. Math. Comp. 49:507-522.
10. P.C. Hansen (1994). Regularization tools: A Matlab package for analysis and solution of discrete ill-posed problems. Num. Algorithms 6:1-35.
11. U. Hämarik, R. Palm, and T. Raus (2007). Use of extrapolation in regularization methods. J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 15:277-293.
12. U. Hämarik, R. Palm, and T. Raus (2008). Extrapolation of Tikhonov and Lavrentiev regularization methods. J. Phys. Conference Series 135:012048.
13. U. Hämarik and T. Raus (2006). On the choice of the regularization parameter in ill-posed problems with approximately given noise level of data. J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 14:251-288.
14. R.D. Lazarov, S. Lu, and S.V. Pereverzyev (2007). On the balancing principle for some problems of numerical analysis. Numerische Mathematik 106:659-689.
15. S. Lu and S.V. Pereverzev (2006). Numerical differentiation from a viewpoint of regularization theory. Math. Comp. 75:1853-1870. (Pubitemid 44719734)
16. S. Lu and S. Pereverzev (2008). Sparse reconstruction by means of the standard Tikhonov regularization. J. Phys. Conference Series 135:012066.
17. S. Lu and S. Pereverzev (2009). Sparse recovery by the standard Tikhonov method. Numer. Math. 112:403-424.
18. S. Lu, S.V. Pereverzev, and R. Ramlau (2007). An analysis of Tikhonov regularization for nonlinear ill-posed problems under a general smoothness assumption. Inverse Probl. 23:217-230.
19. P. Mathé (2006). The Lepskii principle revisited. Inverse Probl. L11-L15.
20. P. Mathé and S.V. Pereverzev (2003). Discretization strategy for linear ill-posed problems in variable Hilbert scales. Inverse Probl. 19:1263-1277.
21. P. Mathé and S.V. Pereverzev (2003). Geometry of linear ill-posed problems in variable Hilbert scales. Inverse Probl. 19:789-803.
22. P. Mathé and S.V. Pereverzev (2006). Regularization of some linear ill-posed problems with discretized random noisy data. Math. Comp. 75:1913-1929.
23. P. Mathé and S.V. Pereverzev (2006). The discretized discrepancy principle under general source conditions. J. Complexity 22:371-381.
24. P. Mathé and U. Tautenhahn (2006). Interpolation in variable Hilbert scales with application to inverse problems. Inverse Probl. 22:2271-2297.
25. V. Morozov (1966). On the solution of functional equations by the method of regularization. Soviet Math. Dokl. 7:414-417.
26. S.V. Pereverzev and E. Schock (2005). On the adaptive selection of the parameter in the regularization of ill-posed problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 43:2060-2076.
27. T. Raus (1985). On the discrepancy principle for solution of ill-posed problems with nonselfadjoint operators. Acta et Comment. Univ. Tartuensis 715:12-20 (in Russian).
28. T. Raus (1990). An a posteriori choice of the regularization parameter in case of approximately given error bound of data. Acta et Comment. Univ. Tartuensis 913:73-87.
29. T. Raus (1992). About regularization parameter choice in case of approximately given error bounds of data. Acta et Comment. Univ. Tartuensis 937:77-89.
30. T. Raus (1999). Differential and Integral Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis (A. Pedas, ed.). Estonian Mathematical Society, Tartu, pp. 81-96.
31. T. Raus and U. Hämarik (2008). About the balancing principle for choice of the regularization parameter. J. Phys. Conference Series 135:012087.
32. T. Raus and U. Hämarik (2009). On numerical realization of quasioptimal parameter choices in (iterated) Tikhonov and Lavrentiev regularization. Math. Model. Anal. 14:99-108.
33. T. Raus and U. Hämarik (2007). On the quasioptimal regularization parameter choices for solving ill-posed problems. J. Inverse and Ill-Posed Probl. 15:419-439.
34. U. Tautenhahn and U. Hämarik (1999). The use of monotonicity for choosing the regularization parameter in ill-posed problems. Inverse Probl. 15:1487-1505.
35. G. Vainikko and A. Veretennikov (1986). Iteration Procedures in Ill-Posed Probl. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).