2009 Report from the editors;Informe de los editores: 2009

Revista Clinica Espanola

Volumn 210, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 33-40

  Garcia Puig J ^a   Gaspar Alonso Vega, G ^a   Rios Blanco J J ^a  

^a Revista Clínica Española

Author keywords

Editorial activity; Editors; Impact factor; Peer review; Reviewers

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHOR; AUTOMATION; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CONTINUING EDUCATION; EDITOR; EVALUATION; INTERNAL MEDICINE; INTERNET; LANGUAGE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MOTIVATION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RESIDENT; FORECASTING; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS; TRENDS;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; FORECASTING; INTERNAL MEDICINE; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 73449094490     PISSN: 00142565     EISSN: 15781860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rce.2009.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. García Puig J., Gaspar Alonso-Vega G., and Ríos Blanco J.J. Nueva dirección de Revista Clínica Española. Rev Clin Esp 209 (2009) 1-2
2. Bryson C.L., Au D.H., Sun H., Williams E.C., Kiviahan D.R., and Bradley K.A. Alcohol screening scores and medication nonadherence. Ann Intern Med 149 (2008) 795-803
3. Camí J. Fortalezas y limitaciones del peer review. Med Clin (Barc) 131 (2008) 20-24
4. Polar F.J. The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165 (1995) 685-688
5. Evans A.T., McNutt R.A., Fletcher S.W., and Fletcher R.H. The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews. J Gen Intern Med 8 (1993) 422-428
6. Morris S. The future of journals: Where will electronic publishing take us?. Hosp Med 62 (2001) 301-304