Production technology selection: Deploying market requirements, competitive and operational strategies, and manufacturing attributes

International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 345-355

  Chuang, M ^a   Yang, Y S ^b   Lin, C T ^a  

^a DA YEH UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b AEROSPACE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Manufacturing attributes; New technology selection; Operational strategy; Quality function deployment (QFD); Relationship matrix

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; INVESTMENTS; MANUFACTURE; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT;

MANUFACTURING COMPANIES; MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES; NEW PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES; OPERATIONAL STRATEGIES; PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENTS (QFD); RELATIONSHIP MATRIX; TECHNOLOGY SELECTION;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 73349142977     PISSN: 0951192X     EISSN: 13623052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09511920802209066     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Aggarwal, S., 1997. Flexibility management: The ultimate strategy. Industrial Management, 39 (1), 26-31.
2. Badri, M.A., 2001. A combined AHP-GP model for quality control systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 72, 27-40.
3. Bard, J.F. and Feo, T.A., 1991. An algorithm for the manufacturing equipment selection problem. IIE Transactions, 23 (1), 83-92.
4. Bruce, W.L. and Albert, L., 1999. A strategic investment model for phased implementation of flexible manufacturing systems. International Transactions in Operational Research, 6, 331-344.
5. Cao, O. and Schniederjans, M.J., 2004. Empirical study of the relationship between operations strategy and information systems strategic orientation in an e-commerce environment. International Journal of Production Research, 42 (15), 2915-2939.
6. Fine, C.H. and Freund, R.M., 1990. Optimal investment in product-flexible manufacturing capacity. Management Science, 36 (4), 449-466.
7. Frazelle, E., 1985. Suggested techniques enabling multicriteria evaluation of material handling alternatives. Industrial Engineering, 17 (2), 42-48.
8. Gopalakrishnan, B., Yoshii, T., and Dappili, S.M., 2004. Decision support system for machining center selection. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15 (2), 144-154.
9. Kakati, M., 1997. Strategic evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology. International Journal of Production Economics, 53, 141-156.
10. Karabakal, N., Lohmann, J.R., and Bean, J.C., 1994. Parallel replacement under capital rationing constraints. Management Science, 40 (3), 305-319.
11. Karsak, E.E. and Kuzgunkaya, O., 2002. A fuzzy multiple objective programming approach for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system. International Journal of Production Economics, 79, 101-111.
12. Kim, S.H., Jang, D.H., Lee, D.H., and Cho, S.H., 2000. A methodology of constructing a decision path for IT investment. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 17-38.
13. Kleindorfer, P.R. and Partovi, F.Y., 1990. Integrating manufacturing strategy and technology choice. European Journal of Operational Research, 47, 214-224.
14. Miller, J.G. and Hayslip, W., 1989. Implementing manufacturing strategic planning. Planning Review, 17 (4), 23-48.
15. Monahan, G.E. and Smunt, T.L., 1989. Optimal acquisition of automated flexible manufacturing processes. Operations Research, 37, 288-300.
16. Moskowitz, H. and Kim, K.J., 1997. QFD optimizer: A novice friendly quality function deployment decision support system for optimizing product design. Computer and Industrial Engineering, 32, 641-655.
17. Naik, B. and Chakravarty, A.K., 1992. Strategy acquisition of new manufacturing technology: A review and research framework. International Journal of Production Research, 30 (7), 1575-1601.
18. Porter, M.E., 1985. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.
19. Pretorius, M.W. and Wet, G.D., 2000. A model for the assessment of new technology for the manufacturing enterprise. Technovation, 20, 3-10.
20. Rajagopalan, S. and Soteriou, A.C., 1994. Capacity acquisition and disposal with discrete facility sizes. Management Science, 40 (7), 903-917.
21. Rezaie, K. and Ostadi, B., 2007. A mathematical model for optimal and phased implementation of flexible manufacturing systems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 184, 729-736.
22. Roller, L.H and Tombak, M.M., 1993. Competition and investment in flexible technologies. Management Science, 39, 107-114.
23. Roth, A.V., Gaimon, C., and Krajewski, L., 1991. Optimal acquisition of FMS technology subject to technological progress. Decision Sciences, 22, 308-334.
24. Schniederjans, M.J. and Garvin, T., 1997. Using the analytic hierarchy process and multi-objective programming for the selection of cost drivers in activity-based costing. European Journal of Operational Research, 100, 72-80.
25. Shang, J. and Sueyoshi, T., 1995. A unified framework for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system. European Journal of Operational Research, 85, 297-315.
26. Sprow, E.E., 1992. The new ABCs of cost justification. Manufacturing Engineering, December, 27-32.
27. Stecke, K.E. and Raman, N., 1995. FMS planning decisions, operating flexibilities and system performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42, 82-90.
28. Suresh, N.C., 1992. A generalized multimachine replacement model for flexible automation investments. IIE Transactions, 24 (2), 131-143.
29. Tabucanon, M.T., Batanov, D.N., and Verma, D.K., 1994. Decision support system for multicriteria machine selection for flexible manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry, 25 (2), 131-143.
30. Tan, K.H. and Platts, K., 2004. The connectance model revisited: A tool for manufacturing objective deployment. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15 (2), 131-143.
31. Tombak, M.H., 1990. A strategic analysis of flexible manufacturing systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 47, 225-238.
32. Wheelwright, S.C. and Hayes, R.H., 1985. Competing through manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 99-109.
33. Yurdakul, M., 2004. Selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies using a combined analytic hierarchy process and goal programming model. Robotic and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 20, 329-340.