Institutional capacities in the land development for housing on greenfield sites in Istanbul

Habitat International

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 183-195

  Sence Turk, Sevkiye ^a   Korthals Altes, Willem K ^b  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Greenfield sites; Housing; Institutional capacities; Istanbul; Land development; Turkey

Indexed keywords

HOUSING POLICY; HOUSING PROJECT; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; INVESTMENT; LAND MARKET; PROPERTY MARKET; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN HOUSING;

ISTANBUL [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 73349135919     PISSN: 01973975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adams, D., Disberry, A., Hutchison, N., & Munjoma, T. (2001). Ownership constraints to brownfield redevelopment, environmental and planning A. 33, 453-477.
2. Akdeniz H. Imar Planlarinin Uygulanmasinda Arazi ve Arsa Düzenlemesi (The land readjustment in the implementation of local physical plans) (2001), Teknik Yayinevi, Ankara (in Turkish)
3. Alexander E.R. A transaction- cost theory of land use planning and development control. Town Planning Review 72 (2001) 45-75
4. Alexander E.R. Governance and transaction costs in planning systems: a conceptual framework for institutional analysis of land-use planning and development control-the case of Israel. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28 (2001) 755-776
5. Alkan A. Türkiye'de 1980'den Sonra Dar Gelirlilerin Konut Sorunu ve Konut Kooperatifleri (Housing problems of low income groups after 1980 and housing cooperatives) (1999), TÜRKKENT Yayi{dotless}ni{dotless}, Ankara
6. Alti{dotless}n. Y. & Turk, S. S. (2005). İstanbul Metropoliten Alani{dotless}nda İmar Plani{dotless} Deǧişiklikleri ile İlgili Bir Analiz [An analysis related to plan amendments in Istanbul metropolitan area]. 8 Kasi{dotless}m Dünya Şehircilik Günü 29. Kolokyumu Planlamada Yeni Politika ve Stratejiler, Riskler ve Fi{dotless}rsatlar, 7-9 Nov., 2005, Taşki{dotless}şla, Istanbul.
7. Baharoglu D. Housing supply under different economic development strategies and the forms of state intervention: the experience of Turkey. Habitat International 20 1 (1996) 43-60
8. Ball M. Institutions in British property research: a review. Urban Studies 35 (1998) 1501-1517
9. Ball M. Markets and structure of the housebuilding industry: an international perspective. Urban Studies 40 (2003) 897-916
10. Buitelaar E. A transaction-cost analysis of land development process. Urban Studies 41 13 (2004) 2539-2553
11. Crozier M. The bureaucratic phenomenon (1964), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
12. De Wolff H. Development of land for new urban areas: in search of a new approach. In: Dixon-Gough R.W., and Mansberger R. (Eds). Transactions in international land management (2001), Ashgate, Aldershot 81-99
13. EGE-KOOP. (1995). 2000'e Doǧru Kent Kooperatifçiliǧi [Cooperatives towards 2000]. Izmir.
14. Ersoy M. Land readjustment process in the implementation of local physical planning (İmar plani{dotless} uygulamalari{dotless}nda düzenleme işlemi). In: Ersoy M., and Keskinok C. (Eds). Mekan Planlama and Yargi{dotless} Denetimi (Local physical planning and legal control) (2000), Yargi{dotless}, Ankara 72-98 (in Turkish)
15. Genis S. Producing elite localities: the rise of gated communities in Istanbul. Urban Studies 44 4 (2007) 771-798
16. Geray C. Bölgesel Gelişme için Planlama ve Örgütlenme (Planning and organization for regional development). AUSBFD 52 (1997) 1-4
17. Glaeser E., Gyourko J., and Saks R. Why is Manhattan so expensive? Regulation and the rise in the house prices. Journal of Law and Economics 48 (2005) 331-370
18. Glaeser E., Gyourko J., and Saks R. Why have housing prices gone up?. American Economic Review 95 (2005) 329-333
19. Groetelaers D.A., and Korthals Altes W.K. Policy instruments in the changing context of Dutch land development. In: Deakin M., Dixon-Gough R., and Mansberger R. (Eds). Methodologies, models, and instruments for rural and urban land management (2004), Ashgate, Aldershot 75-87
20. Güven, O. (2007). Büyük Konut Projeleri İçin Arazi ve Arsa Edinim Metodlari{dotless}: İstanbul Örneǧi [Land acquisitions for large scale housing projects: Istanbul Case]. Unpublished Msc Thesis. Institute of Science and Tecnology, ITU.
21. GYODER. (2006). Gayrimenkul Sektörü ve Istanbul İçin Öngörüler [Real estate sector and foresight for Istanbul]. Istanbul.
22. Haksal, I. (1995). Toplu Konut Yolu İle Oluşan Yeni Yerleşim Alanlari{dotless}ni{dotless}n Karşi{dotless}laşti{dotless}rmali{dotless} İncelemesi Bahçeşehir, Halkali{dotless}, Ataköy Örneǧi [Comparative examination new mass housing areas: Bahcesehir, Halkali{dotless}, Ataköy]. Unpublished Msc Thesis, Institute of Science and Tecnology, ITU.
23. Han S.S., and Wang Y. Institutional structure of a property market in Inland China: Chongqing. Urban Studies 40 (2003) 91-112
24. Healey P. An institutional model of the development process. Journal of Property Research 9 (1992) 33-44
25. Healey P. An institutionalist approach to spatial planning. In: Healey P., Khakee A., Motte A., and Needham B. (Eds). Making strategic plans: Innovation in Europe (1997), UCL Press, London 21-38
26. Karnad R.S. Chanelling financial flows for adequate and affordable housing (2008), FIG Working Weeks, 14-19 June, Stockholm, Sweden
27. Keles R. Kentleşme Politikasi{dotless} (Urbanization policy) No. 13 (1990), Ankara, İmge Pub 1990
28. Korthals Altes W.K. Local government and the decentralization of urban regeneration policies in the Netherlands. Urban Studies 39 8 (2002) 1439-1452
29. Korthals Altes W.K. The impact of abolishing social-housing grants on the compact-city policy of Dutch municipalities. Environment and Planning A 39 6 (2007) 1497-1512
30. Leväinen K.I., and Korthals Altes W.K. Public private partnership in land development contracts - a comparative study in Finland and in the Netherlands. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research 2 (2005) 137-148
31. Louw E. Land assembly for urban transformation: the case of Hertogenbosch in The Netherlands. Land Use Policy 25 1 (January 2008) 69-80
32. Mengi A., and Keles R. İmar Hukukuna Giriş (Introduction to development law) (2003), İmge Kitabevi, Ankara (in Turkish)
33. Munoz Gielen D., and Korthals Altes W.K. Lessons from Valencia: separating infrastructure provision from land ownership. Town Planning Review 78 1 (2007) 61-79
34. Needham B. A theory of land price when land is supplied publicly. Urban Studies 29 (1992) 669-681
35. Needham B., and Verhage R. The effects of land policy: quantity as well as quality is important. Urban Studies 35 (1998) 25-44
36. Oncu A. The politics of the urban land markets in Turkey: 1950-1980. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 12 (1988) 38-64
37. Sagalyn L.B. Public/Private development. Journal of the American Planning Association 73 1 (2007) 7-22
38. Sayar Y., and Süer D. İzmir'de Alternatif Bir Konut Alani{dotless} Karşi{dotless}yaka Emlak Bankasi{dotless} Uygulama (An alternative housing area: real estate bank applications in Karşi{dotless}yaka). Ege Mimarli{dotless}k Dergisi Sayi{dotless} 57 (2006), Mimarlar Odasi{dotless} İzmir Şubesi, İzmir (in Turkish)
39. State Planning Organization. (2001). Sekizinci Beş Yi{dotless}lli{dotless}k Kalki{dotless}nma Plani{dotless}, Konut Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu. [8th Five year development plan, housing special expertise report]. Ankara, (in Turkish).
40. State Planning Organization. (2005). Yi{dotless}li{dotless} Programi{dotless} [Programme in 2005]. Ankara (in Turkish).
41. TOKI. (1990). Halkali{dotless} toplu konut yerleşmesi raporu [Halkali{dotless} mass housing area report], T.C. Başbakanli{dotless}k Toplu Konut İdaresi Başkanli{dotless}ǧi{dotless} Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless}, (in Turkish).
42. Toprak Z. Yerel Yönetimler (Local governments) (2006), Nobel Kitabevi, Ankara. 9944-77-038-8 (in Turkish)
43. TurkStat. (2005), Building permit statistics. Ankara.
44. Turel A. 1980 Sonrasi{dotless}nda konut üretiminde gelişmeler (The developments in the housing production after 1980). ODTU Mimarli{dotless}k Fakültesi Dergisi 9 2 (1989) 137-154
45. Turk A.M. ISO 9000 in construction: an examination of its application in Turkey. Building and Environment 41 4 (2006) 501-511
46. Turk S.S. The applicability of land acquisition methods for the provision of serviced residential land in the Turkish case. International Development Planning Review 26 2 (2004) 141-166
47. Turk, S. S. (2005). Constraints affecting the efficiency in use of land readjustment method in Turkey, Cities, 22(1) Feb. 29-42 (SSCI Index).
48. Turk S.S. An analysis on the efficient applicability of the land readjustment (LR) method in Turkey. Habitat International 31 1 (2007) 53-64
49. Turk S.S. An examination for efficient applicability of the land readjustment method at the international context. Journal of Planning Literature 22 3 (2008) 229-242
50. Turk C., and Turk S.S. Hukuki ve Teknik Boyutlari{dotless} ile Arazi ve Arsa Düzenlemesi (Land readjustment with legal and technical dimensions) (2006), Beta Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless}, Istanbul. 975-295-560-6 (in Turkish)
51. Van Dijk T., Munoz Gielen D., and Groetelaers D.A. Expanding cities: a grounded conceptual model that allows comparing systems of greenfield land development. Town Planning Review 78 3 (2007) 279-310
52. Verhage R. Induced cooperation in housing development: comparing housing schemes in four European countries. European Planning Studies 10 3 (2002) 305-320
53. Verhage R. Local policy housing development European experiments (2002), Ashgate, Aldershot
54. Yetkin F. Emlak G.Y.O.A.Ş (Real estate). 73 (July-August 2005), Elegans Magazine
55. Zevenbergen J. A systems approach to land registration and Cadastre. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research 1 (2004) 11-24. www.yerelnet.org