An experimental model for kinematic analysis of the knee

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 91, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2009, Pages 150-163

  Victor, Jan ^a   Van Glabbeek, Francis ^b   Sloten, Jos Vander ^c   Parizel, Paul M ^b   Somville, Johan ^b   Bellemans, Johan ^d  

^a AZ St Lucas   (Belgium)

^b ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANKLE; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMUR; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; KNEE; KNEE INSTABILITY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LIMB AMPUTATION; LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; TENODESIS; THAWING; TIBIA; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 73349128738     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00498     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Pinskerova V, Maquet P, Freeman MAR. Annotation; writings on the knee between 1836 and 1917. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:1100-2.
2. Frankel VH, Burstein AH, Brooks DB. Biomechanics of internal derangement of the knee. Pathomechanics as determined by analysis of the instant centers of motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53:945-62, 977.
3. Soudan K, Van Audekercke R, Martens M. Methods, difficulties and in-accuracies in the study of human joint kinematics and pathokinematics by the instant axis concept. Example: the knee joint. J Biomech. 1979;12:27-33.
4. Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983;105: 136-44.
5. Bull AM, Amis AA. Knee joint motion: description and measurement. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1998;212:357-72.
6. Hollister AM, Jatana S, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG. The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;290:259-68.
7. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD. The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:111-8.
8. Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:1189-95.
9. Eckhoff D, Hogan C, DiMatteo L, Robinson M, Bach J. Difference between the epicondylar and cylindrical axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;461:238-44.
10. Banks SA, Hodge WA. Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1996;43:638-49.
11. Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:69-81.
12. Lu TW, Tsai TY, Kuo MY, Hsu HC, Chen HL. In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the normal knee during active extension under unloaded and loaded conditions using single-plane fluoroscopy. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30:1004-12.
13. Moro-oka TA, Hamai S, Miura H, Shimoto T, Higaki H, Fregly BJ, Iwamoto Y, Banks SA. Dynamic activity dependence of in vivo normal knee kinematics. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:428-34.
14. Karrholm J, Brandsson S, Freeman MAR. Tibiofemoral movement 4: changes of axial rotation caused by forced rotation at the weight-bearing knee studied by RSA. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:1201-3.
15. Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR. Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:1196-8.
16. Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S, Kobayashi A, Sakamoto H, Freeman MAR, Yamano Y. Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:1199-200.
17. Johal P, Williams A, Wragg P, Hunt D, Gedroyc W. Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee. A study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using 'interventional' MRI. J Biomech. 2005;38: 269-76.
18. Kinzel GL, Gutkowski LJ. Joint models, degrees of freedom, and anatomical motion measurement. J Biomech Eng. 1983;105:55-62.
19. Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428: 131-9.
20. Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Innocenti B, Parizel PM, Bellemans J. How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee? Knee. 2009 Feb 4 [Epub ahead of print].
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-10.