Feasibility of opto-electronic surgical instrument identification

Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 253-258

  Kranzfelder, Michael ^a,b   Schneider, Armin ^b   Blahusch, Gerhard ^c   Schaaf, Hansgeorg ^d   Feussner, Hubertus ^a,b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c MVTEC SOFTWARE GMBH   (Germany)

^d Polydiagnost Ltd   (Germany)

Author keywords

Barcode; Instrument Identification; Micro endoscopy; Opto electronic

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CAMERA; ENDOSCOPY; LAPAROSCOPY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATOR; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; TROCAR;

ANIMALS; AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRONICS; ENDOSCOPY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; LAPAROSCOPY; OPTICAL DEVICES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SWINE; TIME FACTORS; WORKFLOW;

EID: 73349125444     PISSN: 13645706     EISSN: 13652931     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645700903053717     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Rattner DW, Park A. Advanced devices for the operating room of the future. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2003;10:85-89
2. Eckmann C, Olbrich G, Shekarriz H, Bruch HP. The empty OR-process analysis and a new concept for fexible and modular use in minimal invasive surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2003;11:45-49
3. Reijnen MM, Zeebregts CJ, Meijerink WJ. Future of operating rooms. Surg Technol Int. 2005;14:21-27
4. Hayden RT, Patterson DJ, Jay DW, Cross C, et al. Computer-assisted bar-coding system signifcantly reduces clinical laboratory specimen identifcation errors in a pediatric oncology hospital. J Pediatr. 2008;152:219-224
5. Marohn MR, Hanly EJ. Twenty-frst century surgery using twenty-frst century technology: surgical robotics. Curr Surg. 2004;61:466-473
6. Greenberg CC, Diaz-Flores R, Lipsitz SR, Regenbogen SE, et al. Bar-coding surgical sponges to improve safety: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2008;247:612-616
7. Shepherd JP, Brickley MR, Jones ML. Automatic identifcation of surgical and orthodontic instruments. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76(2 Suppl):59-62.
8. Feussner H. The operating room of the future: a view from Europe. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2003;10:149-156
9. Herron DM, Gagner M, Kenyon TL, Swanström LL. The minimally invasive surgical suite enters the 21st century. A discussion of critical design elements. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:415-422
10. Smith A, Offodile F. Information management of automatic data capture: an overview of technical developments. Information Management & Computer Security 2002;10:109-118
11. Macario A, Morris D, Morris S. Initial Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Device for Detecting Retained Surgical Gauze Sponges Using Radiofrequency Identifcation Technology. Arch Surg. 2006;141:659-662
12. Kreysa U. Bar coding of medical devices. J Med Dev Reg. Feb. 2006.
13. The 2D data matrix barcode. Computing & control engineering. 2005;16:39.
14. Neuenschwander M, Cohen MR, Vaida AJ, Patchett JA, et al. Practical guide to bar coding for patient medication safety. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003;60:768-779
15. Houni K, Sawaya W, Delignon Y. One-dimensional barcode reading: an information theoretic approach. Appl Opt. 2008;47:1025-1036
16. Jones ML, Shepherd JP, Brickley MR. A technique for the computerized identifcation of orthodontic instruments. British Journal of Orthodontics. 1995;22:269-271