Quality matters: Publishing in the Era of CONSORT, REFLECT, and EBM

Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 8-9

  Hinchcliff, K W ^a   Di Bartola, S P ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; EDITORIAL; METHODOLOGY; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARD; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

EID: 73349122338     PISSN: 08916640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0435.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. O'Connor A, Sargeant JM, Gardner IA, et al. The REFLECT statement: Methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized control trials for livestock and food safety. J Vet Intern Med 2010;24:57-64.
2. Sargeant J, Thompson A, Valcour J, et al. Quality of report- ing of clinical trials involving dogs and cats and associations with treatment effects. J Vet Intern Med 2010;24:44-50.
3. Sahora A, Khanna C. A survey of evidence in the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine (JVIM) oncology manuscripts from 1999-2007. J Vet Intern Med 2010;24:51-56.
4. Haggstrom J, Boswood A, O'Grady M, et al. Effect of benazepril hydrochloride in survival times of dogs with congestive heart failure caused by mixomatous mitral valve disease: The QUEST study. J Vet Intern Med 2008;22:1124-1135.