Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 663-671

  Begg, Tasneem ^a   Geerts, Greta A V M ^b   Gryzagoridis, Jasson ^c  

^a University of the Western Cape ^*  (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE   (South Africa)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Angled implants; Nonaxial loading; Photoelastic analysis

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN;

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOMECHANICS; CHEMISTRY; COLOR; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; ELASTICITY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; JAW; LIGHT; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; WEIGHT BEARING;

ACRYLIC RESINS; BIOMECHANICS; COLOR; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; JAW; LIGHT; MODELS, ANATOMIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 73349117842     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ten Bruggenkate CM, Sutter F, Oosterbeek HS, Schroeder A. Indications for angled implants. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:85-93.
2. Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, Lindstrom H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:405-414.
3. Aparicio C, Perales P, Rangert B. Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: A clinical, radiologic, and periotest study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:39-49.
4. Kronstrom M, Widbom T, Lofquist LE, Henningson C, Widbom C, Lundberg T. Early functional loading of conical Brånemark implants in the edentulous mandible: A 12-month follow-up clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:335-340.
5. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. "All-on-Four"immediate-function concept with Brånemark system implants for completely edentulous mandibles: A retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5(suppl 1):2-9.
6. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Brånemark system implants for completely edentulous maxillae: A 1-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(suppl 1):S88-S94.
7. Isidor F. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(suppl 2):8-18.
8. Frost HM. Perspectives: Bone’s mechanical usage windows. Bone Miner 1992;9:257-271.
9. Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod 2004;74:3-15.
10. Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:143-152.
11. Miyata T, Kobayashi Y, Araki H, Ohto T, Shin K. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. Part 3:A histologic study in monkeys. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:425-431.
12. Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants:An animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:207-218.
13. Melsen B, Lang NP. Biological reactions of alveolar bone to orthodontic loading of oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:144-152.
14. Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic aspects. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:949-956.
15. Naert IE, Duyck JA, Hosny MM, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients Part II: An up to 15-years radiographic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:245-251.
16. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-111.
17. Engel E, Gomez-Roman G, Axmann-Krcmar D. Effect of occlusal wear on bone loss and Periotest value of dental implants. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:444-450.
18. Wennerberg A, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Influence of occlusal factors on treatment outcome: A study of 109 consecutive patients with mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses opposing maxillary complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:550-555.
19. Canay S, Hersek N, Akpinar I, Asik Z. Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finiteelement analysis. Quintessence Int 1996;27:591-598.
20. Ueda C, Markarian RA, Sendyk CL, Lagana DC. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution on parallel and angled implants after installation of fixed prostheses. Braz Oral Res 2004;18:45-52.
21. Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant-A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:279-286.
22. Sütpideler M, Eckert SE, Zobitz M, An KN. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:819-825.
23. Barbier L, Schepers E. Adaptive bone remodeling around oral implants under axial and nonaxial loading conditions in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:215-223.
24. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Brånemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-247.
25. Sahin S, Cehreli MC, Yalcin E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses-A review. J Dent 2002;30:271-282.
26. Duyck J, Vandamme K, Geris L, et al. The influence of micromotion on the tissue differentiation around immediately loaded cylindrical turned titanium implants. Arch Oral Biol 2006;51:1-9.
27. Mechanics of Solids [syllabus]. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Department of Mechanical Engineering website. http://www. me. udel. edu/meeg215/MEEG_215_Lab3_08. pdf:3-5. Accessed September 25, 2008.