The McGurk phenomenon in Italian listeners;L'effetto mcgurk nell'ascoltatore italiano

Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 203-208

  Bovo, R ^a   Ciorba, A ^a   Prosser, S ^a   Martini, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF FERRARA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Audio visual integration; Bimodal perception; Mcgurk effect; Speech reading

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ITALY; LANGUAGE; MALE; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PHONETICS; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VIDEORECORDING;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; ITALY; LANGUAGE; MALE; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PHONETICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 73349117511     PISSN: 0392100X     EISSN: 1827675X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Middelweerd MJ, Plomp R. The effect of speechreading on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1987;82:2145-7.
2. McGurk H, MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 1976;264:746-8.
3. Kuhl PK, Meltzoff AN. The bimodal perception of speech in infancy. Science 1982;218:1138-41.
4. Dodd B. Lip-reading in infants: attention to speech presented in- and out-of-synchrony. Cogn Psychol 1979;11:478-84.
5. De Gelder B, Bertelson P. Multisensory integration, perception and ecological validity. Trends Cogn Sci 2003;7:460-7.
6. Chen Th, Massaro DW. Mandarin speech perception by ear and eye follows a universal principle. Percept Psychophys 2004;66:820-36.
7. MacKain K, Studdert-Kennedy M, Spieker S, Stern D. Infant intermodal speech perception is a left-hemisphere function. Science 1983;219:1347-9.
8. Burnham D. Visual recognition of mother by young infants: facilitation by speech. Perception 1993;22:1133-53.
9. Massaro DW, Thompson LA, Barron B, Laren E. Developmental changes in visual and auditory contributions to speech perception. J Exp Child Psychol 1986;41:93-113.
10. Burnham D, Dodd B. Auditory-visual speech integration by prelinguistic infants: perception of an emergent consonant in the McGurk effect. Dev Psychobiol 2004;45:204-20.
11. Desjardins RN, Rogers J, Werker JF. An exploration of why preschoolers perform differently than do adults in audiovisual speech perception tasks. Exp Child Psychol 1997;66:85-110.
12. MacDonald J, McGurk H. Visual influence on speech perception. Percept Psychophys 1978;24:253-7.
13. Sekiyama K, Tohkura Y. McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Jap-anese syllables of high auditory intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am 1991;90:1797-805.
14. Fuster-Duran A. Perception of conflicting audio-visual speech: an examination across Spanish and German. In: Stork DG, hennecke ME, editors. Speech-reading by humans and machines. new York: Springer-Verlag; 1996. p. 135-43.
15. Werker JF, Frost PE, McGurk H. La langue et les lèvres: cross-language influences on bimodal speech perception. Can J Psychol 1992;46:551-68.
16. Grassegger H. McGurk effect in German and Hungarian listeners. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Congress organizer at KTh and Stockholm university, Stockholm 1995. p. 210-3.
17. Munhall KG, Gribble P, Sacco L, Ward M. Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect. Percept Psychophys 1996;58:351-62.
18. Green KP, Kuhl PK, Meltzoff AN, Stevens EB. Integrating speech information across talkers, gender, and sensory modality: female faces and male voices in the McGurk effect. Percept Psychophys 1991;50:524-36.
19. Green KP, Gerdeman A. Cross-modal discrepancies in coarticulation and the integration of speech information: the McGurk effect with mismatched vowels. J Exp Psychol hum Percept Perform 1995;21:1409-26.
20. Diesch E. Left and right hemifield advantages of fusions and combinations in audiovisual speech perception. Q J Exp Psychol A 1995;48:320-33.
21. Martini A, Bovo R, Agnoletto M, Da Col M, Drusian A, lid-deo M, et al. Dichotic performance in elderly Italians with Italian stop consonant-vowel stimuli. Audiology 1988;27:1-7.
22. Massaro DW, Cohen MM, Smeele PM. Perception of asynchronous and conflicting visual and auditory speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;100:1777-86.
23. Zambarbieri D. The latency of saccades toward auditory tar-gets in humans. Prog Brain Res 2002;140:51-9.
24. Ben-Artzi E, Marks LE. Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: role of stimulus difference. Percept Psychophys 1995;57:1151-62.
25. McDonald JJ, Ward LM. Involuntary listening aids seeing: evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychol Sci 2000;11:167-71.
26. Kuhl PK. Learning and representation in speech and language. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1994;4:812-22.
27. Sekiyama K, Burnham D. Impact of language on development of auditory-visual speech perception. Dev Sci 2008;11:306-20.
28. Massaro DW, Tsuzaki M, Cohen MM, Gesi A, heredia R. Bimodal speech perception: an examination across languages. J Phonetics 1993;21:445-78.
29. Soto-Faraco S, navarra J, Weikum WM, Vouloumanos A, Sebastián-Gallés N, Werker JF. Discriminating languages by speech-reading. Percept Psychophys 2007;69:218-31.
30. Massaro DW. Perceiving talking faces: from speech perception to a behavioural principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998.
31. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information & Control 1965;8:338-53.
32. liberman AM, Mattingly IG. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 1985;21:1-36.
33. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Ann Rev Neurosci 2004;27:169-92.
34. Smeele PM, Massaro DW, Cohen MM, Sittig AC. Laterality in visual speech perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998;24:1232-42.
35. Giard Mh, Peronnet F. Auditoryvisual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioural and electrophysiological study. J Cogn Neurosci 1999;11:473-90.
36. Calvert GA, Campbell R, Brammer MJ. Evidence from func-tional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex. Curr Biol 2000;10:649-57.
37. Bushara KO, Grafman J, Hallett M. Neural correlates of au-ditory-visual stimulus onset asynchrony detection. J Neurosci 2001;21:300-4.
38. Calvert GA. Crossmodal processing in the human brain: in-sights from functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex 2001;11:1110-23.
39. Musacchia G, Sams M, nicol T, Kraus n. Seeing speech af-fects acoustic information processing in the human brainstem. Exp Brain Res 2006;168:1-10.
40. Sekiyama K, Kanno I, Miura S, Sugita Y. Auditory-visual speech perception examined by fMRI and PET. Neurosci Res 2003;47:277-87.
41. Saldaña HM, Rosenblum LD. Visual influences on auditory pluck and bow judgments. Percept Psychophys 1993;54:406-16.