Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 2787-2794

  Akasu, Takayuki ^a   Iinuma, Gen ^a   Takawa, Masashi ^a   Yamamoto, Seiichiro ^a   Muramatsu, Yukio ^a   Moriyama, Noriyuki ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER CENTER HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HIGH RESOLUTION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MESORECTAL FASCIA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIS LYMPH NODE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM; RECTUM CANCER; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; COLLOID CARCINOMA; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; LYMPH NODE; METASTASIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PELVIS TUMOR; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; RECTUM TUMOR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADENOCARCINOMA, MUCINOUS; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PELVIC NEOPLASMS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 73349101546     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0613-3     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Havenga K, DeRuiter MC, Enker WE, Welvaart K. Anatomical basis of autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1996;83:384-8.
2. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CAM, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:638-46.
3. Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer, Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 980-7.
4. Akasu T, Kondo H, Moriya Y, et al. Endorectal ultrasonography and treatment of early stage rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2000;24:1061-8.
5. Zaheer S, Pemberton JH, Farouk R, Dozois RR, Wolff BG, Ilstrup D. Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg. 1998;227:800-11.
6. Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ, Leer JW, et al. Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunc-tion in irradiated patients\a Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6199-206.
7. Pollack J, Holm T, Cedermark B, Holmstrom B, Mellgren A. Long-term effect of preoperative radiation therapy on anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:345-52.
8. Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, et al. Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1847-58.
9. Heriot AG, Tekkis PP, Fazio VW, Neary P, Lavery IC Adjuvant radiotherapy is associated with increased sexual dysfunction in male patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: a predictive model. Ann Surg. 2005;242:502-11.
10. Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging\a meta-analysis. Radiology. 2004;232:773-83.
11. Brown G, Richards CJ, Newcombe RG, et al. Rectal carcinoma: thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients. Radiology. 1999;211:215-22.
12. Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF, et al. Accuracy of mag-netic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet. 2001;357:497-504.
13. Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, Newcombe RG, Radcliffe AG, Dallimore NS, Williams GT. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-res-olution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology. 2003;227:371-7.
14. Akasu T, Iinuma G, Fujita T, et al. Thin-section MRI with a phased-array coil for preoperative evaluation of pelvic anatomy and tumor extent in patients with rectal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:531-8.
15. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al., editors. American Joint Committee on cancer staging manual. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Springer; 2002.
16. MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1993; 341:457-60.
17. Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:583-96.
18. Akasu T, Moriya Y. Abdominopelvic lymphadenectomy with autonomic nerve preservation for carcinoma of the rectum: Jap-anese experience. In: Wanebo HJ, editor. Surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a multidisciplinary approach. Philadel-phia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. p. 667-80.
19. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37-46.
20. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provi-sion for scaled disagreement or partial credit Psychol Bull. 1968;70:213-30.
21. Landis JR, Koch GG The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-74.
22. Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, et al. Rates of circumfer-ential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2002;235: 449-57.
23. Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E, et al. Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89:327-34.
24. MERCURY Study Group (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of preop-erative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ. 333:779-82. Epub 2006 Sep 19.
25. Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG, Dallimore NS, Bourne MW, Williams GT. Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imag-ing. Br J Surg. 2003;90:355-64.
26. Kim CK, Kim SH, Choi D, Kim MJ, Chun HK, Lee SJ, et al. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evalua-tion ofrectal cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:853-59.
27. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, et al. Potential prognostic benefit of lateral pelvic node dissection for rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection. Ann Surg. 2007;245:80-7.
28. Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kato T, et al. Indication and benefit of pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1663-72.
29. Syk E, Torkzad MR, Blomqvist L, Ljungqvist O, Glimelius B. Radiological findings do not support lateral residual tumour as a major cause of local recurrence of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:113-9.
30. Kim TH, Jeong SY, Choi DH, et al. Lateral lymph node metas-tasis is a major cause of locoregional recurrence in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative resec-tion. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:729-37.
31. Akasu T, Sugihara K, Moriya Y. Male urinary and sexual func-tions after mesorectal excision alone or in combination with extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. DOI:10.1245/s10434-009-0546- x.
32. Kim JH, Beets GL, Kim MJ, Kessels AG, Beets-Tan RG High-resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size? Eur J Radiol. 2004;52:78-83.
33. Koh DM, Brown G, Temple L, et al. Rectal cancer: mesorectal lymph nodes at MR imaging with USPIO versus histopathologic findings\initial observations. Radiology. 2004; 231:91-9.
34. Lahaye MJ, Engelen SM, Kessels AG, et al. USPIO-enhanced MR imaging for nodal staging in patients with primary rectal cancer: predictive criteria. Radiology. 2008;246:804-11. Epub 2008 Jan 14.