Comparison of glaucoma diagnostic capabilities of cirrus HD and stratus optical coherence tomography

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 127, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1603-1609

  Park, Seong Bae ^a   Sung, Kyung Rim ^a   Kang, Sung Yong ^a   Kim, Kyung Ri ^a   Kook, Michael S ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC NERVE FIBER; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THICKNESS; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBER; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETINA GANGLION CELL; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 73349089982     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: 15383601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.296     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Burgansky-Eliash Z, Wollstein G, Chu T, et al. Optical coherence tomography machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection: a preliminary study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(11):4147-4152.
2. Huang ML, Chen HY. Development and comparison of automated classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Stratus optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(11):4121-4129.
3. Kanamori A, Nagai-Kusuhara A, Escano MF, Maeda H, Nakamura M, Negi A. Comparison of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, scanning laser polarimetry and optical coherence tomography to discriminate ocular hypertension and glaucoma at an early stage. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244 (1):58-68.
4. Lalezary M, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, et al. Baseline optical coherence tomography predicts the development of glaucomatous change in glaucoma suspects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142(4):576-582.
5. Leung CK, Chan WM, Yung WH, et al. Comparison of macular and peripapillary measurements for the detection of glaucoma: an optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(3):391-400.
6. Manassakorn A, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disk algorithms with optical coherence tomography to detect glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(1):105-115.
7. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Vessani RM, Susanna R Jr, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139(1):44-55.
8. Naithani P, Sihota R, Sony P, et al. Evaluation of optical coherence tomography and heidelberg retinal tomography parameters in detecting early and moderate glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(7):3138-3145.
9. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Nikkhou K, Hoffman DC, Law SK, Caprioli J. Detection of early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography (StratusOCT). J Glaucoma. 2008; 17(3):183-188.
10. Parikh RS, Parikh S, Sekhar GC, et al. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2007;114 (12):2238-2243.
11. Sihota R, Sony P, Gupta V, Dada T, Singh R. Comparing glaucomatous optic neuropathy in primary open angle and chronic primary angle closure glaucoma eyes by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005;25(5):408-415.
12. Quigley HA, Katz J, Derick RJ, Gilbert D, Sommer A. An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(1):19-28.
13. Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(1): 77-83.
14. Zeyen TG, Caprioli J. Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(1):62-65.
15. Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using StratusOCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(6):1716-1724.
16. Hodapp E, Parrish RK, Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1993:53.
17. Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP, et al. Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from prediagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(1):24-30.
18. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(3):837-845.
19. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature, III: how to use an article about a diagnostic test. B: what are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1994;271(9):703-707.
20. Budenz DL, Michael A, Chang RT, McSoley J, Katz J. Sensitivity and specificity of the Stratus OCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(1):3-9.
21. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Berry CC, et al. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(9):1993-2003.
22. Budenz DL, Anderson DR, Varma R, et al. Determinants of normal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Stratus OCT. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(6): 1046-1052.
23. Gurses-Ozden R, Durbin M, Callan T, et al. Distribution of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using Cirrus HD-OCT spectral domain technology. Paper presented at: ARVO 2008 Annual Meeting; April 30, 2008; Fort Lauderdale, FL. E-abstract 4632.