Qualitative and mixed methods research in cross-cultural psychology

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 909-916

  Karasz, Alison ^a   Singelis, Theodore M ^b  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73249151203     PISSN: 00220221     EISSN: 15525422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022022109349172     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adamopoulos, J., & Lonner, W.J. (2001). Culture and psychology at a crossroad: Historical perspective and theoretical analysis. In D. Matsumoto (Ed.), The handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 11-34). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. Ashworth, P. (2003). The origins of qualitative psychology. London: Sage.
3. Barry, C.A., Britten, N., Bradley, C.P., & Stevenson, F.A. (1999). Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 26-44.
4. Chasiotis, A., Breugelmans, S., & van de Vijver, F. (in press). Fundamental questions of cross-cultural psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Greenfield, P.M. (1997). You can't take it with you: Why ability assessments don't cross cultures. American Psychologist, 52, 1115-1124.
6. Hines, A. (1993). Linking qualitative and quantitative methods in cross-cultural survey research: Techniques from cognitive science. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 729-746.
7. Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2009). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14-36.
8. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9. Maxcy, S. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple models of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In C.Teddlie & A. Tashakkori (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 51-90). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Maxwell, J. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33, 3-11.
11. Maxwell, J., & Loomis, D. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In C.Teddlie & A. Tashakkori (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 241-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Mohr, L. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. (1999). Qualitative methods in health research: Opportunities and considerations in application and review. Washington, DC: Culture and Qualitative Research Interest Group, National Institutes of Health.
14. Ratner, C., & Hui, L. (2003). Theoretical and methodological problems in cross-cultural psychology [References]. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33, 203.
15. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Tesch, R. (2009). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Basingstoke, UK: Falmer Press.
18. Wundt, W. (2008). Elements of folk psychology-Outline of a psychological history of the development of mankind. San Francisco: Blakiston Press.