A study on acid reclamation and copper recovery using low pressure nanofiltration membrane

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 156, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 257-263

  Ahmad, Abdul Latif ^a   Ooi, Boon Seng ^a  

^a SCHOOL OF PHYSICS   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Copper; Nanofiltration; pH; Proton; Sulfate

Indexed keywords

ACID STRENGTHS; APPLIED PRESSURE; COPPER IONS; COPPER RECOVERY; EFFECT OF PRESSURE; EXTENDED NERNST-PLANCK EQUATION; LOW PRESSURES; THREE PARAMETERS; VOLUME FLUX;

ACIDS; COPPER; METAL IONS; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; PRESSURE EFFECTS; PROTONS; RECLAMATION; REVERSE OSMOSIS;

PH EFFECTS;

EID: 73249143862     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.10.014     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Castelbanque J., and Salimbeni F. NF and RO membranes for recovery and reuse of water and concentrated metallic salts from wastewater produced in the electroplating process. Desalination 167 (2004) 65-73
2. Lee, S.S., Copper in industrial wastewater and its removal [Online]. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.vadose.net/coper.html, 1998 (accessed 10.01.05).
3. Nanofiltration-133 plating waste, [Online]. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.gewater.com/library/tp/238_Nanofiltration-133_Plating.jsp, 2003 (accessed 10.11.04).
4. Process solution and rinse water recovery/recycle, [Online]. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.lttechnologies.com/process_solution_recovery.htm, 2004 (accessed 4.10.04).
5. Srisuwan G., and Thongchai P. Removal of heavy metals from electroplating wastewater by membrane. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 24 (2002) 965-976
6. Karakulski K., Gryta M., and Morawski A.W. Membrane processes used for separation of effluents from wire productions. Chem. Papers 63 (2009) 205-211
7. Urase T., Salequzzaman M., Kobayashi S., Matsuo T., Yamamoto K., and Suzuki N. Effect of high concentration of organic and inorganic matters in landfill leachate on the treatment of heavy metals in very low concentration level. Water Sci. Technol. 36 (1997) 349-356
8. Qdais H.A., and Moussa H. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater by membrane processes: a comparative study. Desalination 164 (2004) 105-110
9. Csefalvay E., Pauer V., and Mizsey P. Recovery of copper from process waters by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Desalination 240 (2009) 132-142
10. 4 removal. Sep. Purif. 47 (2006) 162-172
11. J.M.K. Timmer, Properties of nanofiltration membranes; model development and industrial application. PhD thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2001).
12. Xu Y., and Lebrun R.E. Investigation of the solute separation by charged nanofiltration membrane: effect of pH, ionic strength and solute type. J. Membr. Sci. 158 (1999) 93-104
13. Jain S., and Gupta S.K. Analysis of modified surface force pore flow model with concentration polarization and comparison with Spiegler-Kedem model in reverse osmosis systems. J. Membr. Sci. 232 (2004) 45-61
14. Levenstein R., Hasson D., and Semiat R. Utilization of the Donnan effect for improving electrolyte separation with nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 116 (1996) 77-92
15. Ahn K.H., Song K.G., Cha H.Y., and Yeom I.T. Removal of ions in nickel electroplating rinse water using low-pressure nanofiltration. Desalination 122 (1999) 77-84
16. Labbez C., Fievet P., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A., Foissy A., and Pagetti J. Analysis of the salt retention of a titania membrane using the "DSPM" model: effect of pH, salt concentration and nature. J. Membr. Sci. 208 (2002) 315-329
17. Mohammad A.W., Lim Y.P., and Kadhum A.H. Characterization and identification of rejection mechanisms in nanofiltration membranes using extended Nernst-Planck model. Clean Tech. Environ. Policy 4 (2002) 151-156
18. Bowen W.R., and Mukhtar H. Characterization and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 112 (1996) 263-274
19. Hanra M., and Ramachandhran V. RO performance analysis of cellulose acetate and TFC polyamide membrane systems for separation of trace contaminants. Desalination 104 (1996) 175-183
20. Childress A.E., and Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 119 (1996) 253-268
21. Ozaki H., Sharma K., and Saktaywin W. Performance of an ultra-low-pressure reverse osmosis membrane (ULPROM) for separating heavy metal: effects of interference parameters. Desalination 144 (2002) 287-294
22. Tsuru T., Hironaka D., Yoshioka T., and Asaeda M. Effect of divalent cations on permeate volume flux through porous titania membranes. Desalination 147 (2002) 213-216
23. Szoke S., Patzay G., and Weiser L. Characteristics of thin-film nanofiltration membranes at various pH-values. Desalination 151 (2002) 123-129
24. Qin J.J., Oo M.H., Lee H., and Coniglio B. Effect of pH on permeate pH and ion rejection under acidic conditions in NF process. J. Membr. Sci. 232 (2004) 153-159
25. Paugam L., Taha S., Dorange G., Jaouen P., and Quemeneur F. Mechanism of nitrate ions transfer in nanofiltration depending on pressure, pH, concentration and medium composition. J. Membr. Sci. 231 (2004) 37-46
26. Tay J.H., Liu J., and Sun D.D. Effect of solution physico-chemistry on the charge property of nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 36 (2002) 585-598
27. Hagmeyer G., and Gimber R. Modelling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary ion mixtures and for single salts at different pH values. Desalination 117 (1998) 247-256
28. Tanninen J., Manttari M., and Nystrom M. Effect of electrolyte strength on acid separation with NF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 294 (2007) 207-212
29. Mehiguene K., Taha S., Gondrexon N., Cabon J., and Dorange G. Copper transfer modeling through a nanofiltration membrane in the case of ternary aqueous solution. Desalination 127 2 (2000) 135-143