Diffusive gradient in thin FILMS (DGT) compared with soil solution and labile uranium fraction for predicting uranium bioavailability to ryegrass

Journal of Environmental Radioactivity

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 140-147

  Duquene L ^a   Vandenhove, H ^a   Tack, F ^b   Van Hees, M ^a   Wannijn, J ^a  

^a BELGIAN NUCLEAR RESEARCH CENTRE   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Availability; Diffusive gradient in thin films (DGT); Labile fraction; Ryegrass; Selective extraction; Soil to plant transfer; Uranium

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSIVE GRADIENT IN THIN FILMS (DGT); DIFFUSIVE GRADIENTS; LABILE FRACTIONS; SELECTIVE EXTRACTION; SOIL-TO-PLANT TRANSFER;

AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS; BIOCHEMISTRY; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); DIFFUSION IN SOLIDS; SOIL MOISTURE; THIN FILMS; TRANSURANIUM ELEMENTS;

URANIUM;

AMMONIUM ACETATE; URANIUM; URANIUM DIOXIDE;

BIOAVAILABILITY; BIOLOGICAL UPTAKE; FILM; GRASS; SOIL POLLUTION; URANIUM;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIOAVAILABILITY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSIVE GRADIENT IN THIN FILM; FRACTIONATION; GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; GREENHOUSE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; METAL EXTRACTION; NONHUMAN; PERENNIAL RYEGRASS; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL CHEMISTRY; SOIL PROPERTY;

ACETATES; BIOLOGICAL AVAILABILITY; DIFFUSION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; LOLIUM; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; RADIATION MONITORING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL POLLUTANTS, RADIOACTIVE; SOLUBILITY; SOLUTIONS; URANIUM; URANIUM COMPOUNDS;

LOLIUM; LOLIUM PERENNE;

EID: 73249140109     PISSN: 0265931X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Almås A.R., Lombnæs P., Sogn T.A., and Mulder J. Speciation of Cd and Zn in contaminated soils assessed by DGT-DIFS, and WHAM/Model VI in relation to uptake of spinach and ryegrass. Chemosphere 62 (2006) 1647-1655
2. ®, Release 3.2., a User's Guide to Rxn, Act2, Tact, React and Gtplot. Hydrogeology Program (2001), University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
3. Blackmore L.C., Searle P.L., and Daly B.K. Methods for chemical analysis of soils. New Zealand Soil Bureau of Science, Report 80 (1987), Lower Hutt, New Zealand
4. Cattani I., Fragoulis G., Boccelli R., and Capri E. Copper bioavailability in the rhizosphere of maize (Zea mays L.) grown in two Italian soils. Chemosphere 64 (2006) 1972-1979
5. Chhabra R., Pleysier J., and Cremers A. The measurement of the cation exchange capacity and exchangeable cations in soils: a new method. In: Bailey S.W. (Ed). Proceedings of the International Clay Conference, Mexico (1975), Applied Science Publishers, London 439-449
6. Davison W., Hooda P.S., Zhang H., and Edwards A.C. DGT measured fluxes as surrogates for uptake of metals by plants. Adv. Environ. Res. 3 4 (2000) 550-555
7. Davison W., and Zhang H. In situ speciation measurements of trace components in natural waters using thin-film gels. Nature 367 (1994) 546-548
8. Day P.R. Particle fraction and particle size analysis. In: Black C.A., Evans D.D., White J.L., Ensminger L.E., and Clarck F.E. (Eds). Methods of Soil Analysis - Part I - Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of Measurements and Sampling (1965), Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin 556-561
9. Degryse F., Smolders E., Oliver I., and Zhang H. Relating soil solution Zn concentration to diffusive gradients in thin films measurements in contaminated soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 17 (2003) 3958-3965
10. Degryse F., Smolders E., and Parker D.R. An agar gel technique demonstrates diffusion limitations to cadmium uptake by plants. Environ. Chem. 3 (2006) 419-423
11. DGT Research Ltd. User's Guide to DGT Technique (2001), DGT Research Ltd. www.dgtresearch.com web address:
12. Diviš P., Dočekalová H., Brulík L., Pavliš M., and Hekera P. Use of the diffusive gradient in thin films technique to evaluate (bio)available trace metal concentrations in river water. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 387 (2007) 2239-2244
13. Donohue S.J., and Friedericks J.B. Laboratory Procedures - Soil Testing and Plant Analysis Laboratory (1984), Virginia Technical Publication, Blacksburg, Virginia 452-881
14. Duquène L., Vandenhove H., Tack F., Van der Avoort E., Van Hees M., and Wannijn J. Plant-induced changes in soil chemistry do not explain differences in uranium transfer. J. Environ. Radioact. 90 (2006) 1-14
15. Duquène L., Vandenhove H., Tack F., Meers E., Baeten J., and Wannijn J. Enhanced phytoextraction of U and selected heavy metals by Indian mustard and ryegrass using biodegradable soil amendments. Sci. Total Environ. 407 (2009) 1496-1505
16. Ebbs S.D., Brady D.J., and Kochian L.V. Role of uranium speciation in the uptake and the translocation of uranium by plants. J. Exp. Bot. 49 (1998) 1183-1190
17. Ernstberger H., Davison W., Zhang H., Tye A., and Young S. Measurement and dynamic modelling of trace metal mobilization in soils using DGT and DIFS. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2002) 349-354
18. Fenton B.R., and Waite T.D. A kinetic study of cation release from a mixed mineral assemblage: implications for determination of uranium uptake. Radiochim. Acta 74 (1996) 251-256
19. Garmo Ø.A., Røyset O., Steinnes E., and Flaten T.P. Performance study of diffusive gradients in thin films for 55 elements. Anal. Chem. 75 (2003) 3573-3580
20. Grenthe I., Furger J., Konings R.J.M., Lemire R.J., Muller A.B., Nguy-en-Trung C., and Wanner H. Chemical Thermodynamics of Uranium (1992), Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
21. Hooda P.S., Zhang H., Davison W., and Edwards A.C. Measuring bioavailable trace metals by diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT): soil moisture effects on its performance in soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 50 (1999) 285-294
22. Koch-Steindl H., and Pröhl G. Considerations on the behaviour of long-lived radionuclides in soil. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 40 (2001) 93-104
23. Langmuir D. Uranium solution-mineral equilibria at low temperature with applications to sedimentary ore deposits. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 42 (1978) 547-569
24. Lehto N.J., Davison W., Zhang H., and Tych W. Theoretical comparison of how soil processes affect uptake of metals by diffusive gradients in thin films and plants. J. Environ. Qual. 35 (2006) 1903-1913
25. Lenhart J.J., and Honeyman B.D. Uranium (VI) sorption to hematite in the presence of humic acid. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 63 (1999) 2891-2901
26. Li W., Zhao J., Li C., Kiser S., and Cornett R.J. Speciation measurements of uranium in alkaline waters using diffusive gradients in thin films technique. Anal. Chim. Acta 575 2 (2006) 274-280
27. Nelson D.W., and Sommers L.E. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Bigham J.M., et al. (Ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3 - Chemical Methods. SSSA Book Series No. 5 (1996) 1001-1006 Madison, Wisconsin
28. Nowack B., Koehler S., and Schulin R. Use of diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) in undisturbed field soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (2004) 1133-1138
29. Payne T.E., Davis J.A., and Waite T.D. Uranium sorption on ferrihydrite - effects of phosphate and humic acid. Radiochim. Acta 74 (1996) 239-243
30. Punshon T., Gaines K.F., Bertsch P.M., and Burger J. Bioavailability of uranium and nickel to vegetation in a contaminated riparian sediment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22 5 (2003) 1146-1154
31. Shahandeh H., and Hossner L.R. Enhancement of uranium phytoaccumulation from contaminated soils. Soil Sci. 167 4 (2002) 269-280
32. Shahandeh H., and Hossner L.R. Role of soil properties in phytoaccumulation of uranium. Water Air Soil Poll 141 (2002) 165-180
33. Song J., Zhao F.-L., Luo Y.-M., McGrath S.P., and Zhang H. Copper uptake by Elsholtzia splendens and Silene vulgaris and assessment of copper phytoavailability in contaminated soils. Environ. Pollut. 128 (2004) 307-315
34. Sowder A.G., Bertsch P.M., and Morris P.J. Partitioning and availability of uranium and nickel in contaminated riparian sediments. J. Environ. Qual. 32 (2003) 885-898
35. Statsoft I. STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System), Version 6 (2004). www.stat.com
36. Vandenhove H., Van Hees M., Wouters K., and Wannijn J. Can we predict uranium bioavailability based on soil parameters? Part 1: effect of soil parameters on soil solution uranium concentration. Environ. Pollut. 145 (2007) 587-595
37. Vandenhove H., Van Hees M., Wannijn J., Wouters K., and Wang L. Can we predict uranium bioavailability based on soil parameters? Part 2: soil solution uranium concentration is not a good bioavailability index. Environ. Pollut. 145 (2007) 577-586
38. Vandenhove H., Antunes K., Wannijn J., Duquène L., and Van Hees M. Method of diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) compared with other soil testing methods to predict uranium phytoavailability. Sci. Total Environ. 373 (2007) 542-555
39. Voïnovitch I.A. Analyse des Sols, Roches et Ciments. Méthodes Choisies (1988), Masson, Paris
40. Waite T.D., Davis J.A., Payne T.E., Waychunas G.A., and Xu N. U (VI) sorption to ferrihydrite: application of the surface complexation model. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 58 (1994) 5465-5478
41. 3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 29 (1965) 677-678
42. Zhang H., Zhao F.J., Sun B., Davison W., and McGrath S. A new method to measure effective soil solution concentration predicts copper availability to plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 2602-2607