Acellular bovine-derived matrix used on a traumatic crush injury of the hand: A case study

Ostomy Wound Management

Volumn 55, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 44-49

  Dunckel, Amy P ^a  

^a St John's Therapy Services Lebanon   (United States)

Author keywords

Acellular tissue matrix; Dermal repair scaffold; Hand injury; Xenotransplantation

Indexed keywords

TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BANDAGE; CATTLE; FINGER; GRAFT REJECTION; HAND INJURY; HUMAN; LIMB SALVAGE; VASCULARIZATION; BIOLOGICAL DRESSING; BOVINAE; HAND INJURIES; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL DRESSINGS; CATTLE; FINGERS; GRAFT REJECTION; HAND INJURIES; HUMANS; LIMB SALVAGE; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 73249139947     PISSN: 08895899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Rees RS, Hirshburg JA. Wound care centers: costs, care and strategies. Adv Wound Care. 1999. Available at: www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi-qa3964/ is-199907/ai-n8859694/. Accessed September 28, 2009.
2. Zbigniew R, Schwartz RA. Modern aspects of wound healing: an update. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:219-229.
3. Khachemoune A, Welsh R, Ehrsam E. An elderly woman with a nonhealing ulcer. Am Fam Phys. 2005;71:2163-2165.
4. Hohlfeld J, de Buys Roessingh A, et al. Tissue engineered fetal skin constructs for pediatric burns. Lancet. 2005;366:840-842.
5. Gohari S, Gambla C, Healey M, et al. Evaluation of tissue-engineered skin (human skin substitute) and secondary intention healing in the treatment of full thickness wounds after Mohs micrographic or excisional surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28:1007-1114.
6. Shores JT, Gabriel A, Gupta S. Skin substitutes and alternatives: a review. Adv Skin Care. 2007;20:493-508.
7. Conn M, Annest J, Ryan G, et al. Non-work-related finger amputations in the United States, 2001-2002. Ann Emer Med. 2005;45:630-635 .
8. Sorock G, Lombardi D, Courtney T, et al. Epidemiology of occupational acute traumatic hand injuries: a literature review. Safety Science. 2001;38:241-256.
9. Wald J, Alvaro R. Psychological factors in work-related amputation: considerations for rehabilitation counselors. J Rehabil. 2004;70:6-15.
10. del Pinal F. Severe mutilating injuries to the hand: guidelines for organizing the chaos. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60:816-827.
11. Bueno R, Neumeister M. Outcomes after mutilating hand injuries: review of the literature and recommendations for assessment. Hand Clin. 2003;19:193-204.
12. Goldman R, Salcido R. More than one way to measure a wound: an overview of tools and techniques. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2002;15:236-243.
13. Majeske C. Reliability of wound surface area measurements. Phys Ther. 1992;72:57-60.
14. Scarborough-Roessler P. Clinical Debridement Skills. Presentation at the Educators 2000 Plus. Kansas City, MO. August 2, 2002.
15. Karges JR, Mark BE, Stikeleather SJ, et al. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume. Phys Ther. 2003;83:134-146.
16. Taylor R, Jayasinghe UW, Koelmeyer L, et al. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema. Phys Ther. 2006;86:205-214.
17. Primatrix Clinical Application Guidelines. Available at: www.teibio.com/Literature/PriMatrix/. Accessed November 1, 2007.
18. Harvey C. Wound healing. Orthopaed Nurs. 2005;24:143-159.
19. Balasubramani M, Kumar T, Babu M. Skin substitutes: a review. Burns. 2001;27:534-544
20. Bolton LL, van Rijswijk L, Shaffer FA. Quality wound care equals cost-effective wound care. Nurs Manag. 1996;27:30-33.
21. Driver V. Health economics of wound care and limb preservation: beyond clinical evidence. Diabet Microvasc Complications Today. 2006;4:29-32.
22. Edwards M. The Informed Practice Nurse, 2nd ed. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd;2008.
23. Singer A, Clark RAF. Cutaneous wound healing. N Eng J Med. 1999;341:738-746.
24. Muhart M, McFalls S, Kirsner RS, et al. Behavior of tissue-engineered skin. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:913-918.
25. Brem H, Balledux J, Bloom T, et al. Healing of diabetic foot ulcers and pressure ulcers with human skin equivalent: a new paradigm in wound healing. Arch Surg. 2000;135:627-634.
26. Sibbald G, Zucker R, Coutts P, et al. Using a dermal skin substitute in the treatment of chronic wounds secondary to recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: a case series. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2005;51:22.
27. Witt P, Cohen DT, Mallory SB. Use of permanent acellular dermal allograft in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa involving hands. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:503-506.
28. Kolenik SA, McGovern TW, Leffell DJ. Use of lyophilized bovine collagen matrix in postoperative wound healing. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:303-307.
29. Badylak S. The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Cell Develop Biol. 2002;13:377-383.
30. Falanga V, Margolis D, Alvarez O, et al. Rapid healing of venous ulcers and lack of clinical rejection with an allogenic cultured skin equivalent. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:293-300.
31. Serena TE. A novel fetal bovine matrix scaffold is rapidly incorporated into animal and human wounds resulting in wound bed stimulation. Wounds. 2005;17:A42.