Nurses' perception of the use of computerised information systems in practice: Questionnaire development

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Volumn 19, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 240-248

  Oroviogoicoechea, Cristina ^a   Watson, Roger ^b   Beortegui, Elena ^a   Remirez, Silvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Information technology; Nurses; Nursing; Questionnaire; Spain

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; NURSING INFORMATICS; NURSING STAFF; PERCEPTION; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPAIN; STANDARD; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VALIDATION STUDY;

HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; NURSING INFORMATICS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; PERCEPTION; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPAIN;

EID: 73149122100     PISSN: 09621067     EISSN: 13652702     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03003.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ammenwerth E, Eichstadter R, Haux R, Kutscha A, Pohl U Ziegler S (2001) A randomized evaluation of a computer-based nursing documentation system. Methods of Information in Medicine 40, 61 68.
2. Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C Eichstadter R (2003) Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two year study. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 10, 69 84.
3. Ammenwerth E, Brender J, Nykanen P, Prokosch H, Rigby M Talmon J (2004) Vision and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems. Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. International Journal of Medical Informatics 73, 479 491.
4. Bryman A Cramer D (2005) Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS 12 and 13. Routledge, Hove, East Sussex.
5. Cork RD, Detmer WM Friedman CP (1998) Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about and attitudes towards computers. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 5, 164 176.
6. Currel R Urquhart C (2003) Nursing records systems: effects on nursing practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. Article no.: CD002099.
7. Currie LM (2005) Evaluation frameworks for nursing informatics. International Journal of Medical Informatics 74, 908 916.
8. Darbyshire P (2004) Rage against the machine?: nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information Systems for clinical information. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13, 17 25.
9. DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P, Ernst DM, Hayden SJ, Lazzara DJ, Savoy SM Kostas-Polston E (2007) A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 39, 155 164.
10. Ferguson E Cox T (1993) Exploratory factors analysis: a users' guide. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 1, 84 94.
11. Friedman CP Abbas UL (2003) Is medical informatics a mature science? A review of measurement practice in outcome studies of clinical systems International Journal of Medical Informatics 69, 261 272.
12. Giuse DA Kuhn KA (2003) Health information systems challenges: the Heidelberg conference and the future. International Journal of Medical Informatics 69, 105 114.
13. Helleso R Ruland CM (2001) Developing a module for nursing documentation integrated in the electronic patient record. Journal of Clinical Nursing 10, 799 805.
14. Jackson C Furnham A (2000) Designing and Analysing Questionnaires and Surveys: A Manual for Health Professionals and Administrators. Whurr Publishers Ltd., London.
15. Kanste O, Miettunen J Kyngäs H (2007) Psychometric properties of the multifactor leadership questionnaire among nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing 57, 201 212.
16. Kaplan B Shaw NT (2004) Future directions in evaluation research: people, organizational and social issues. Methods of Information in Medicine 43, 215 231.
17. Lee T-T (2004) Evaluation of computerised nursing care plan: instrument development. Journal of Professional Nursing 20, 230 238.
18. Lee T-T (2005) Nursing diagnoses: factors affecting their use in charting standardized care plans. Journal of Clinical Nursing 14, 640 647.
19. Lubans DR, Sylva K Osborn Z (2008) Convergent validity and test-retest reliability of the oxford physical activity questionnaire for secondary school students. Behavioural Change 25, 23 24.
20. Moloney R Maggs C (1999) A systematic review of the relationships between written manual nursing care planning, record keeping and patient outcomes. Journal of Advanced Nursing 30, 51 57.
21. Murphy-Black T (2006) Using questionnaires. In The Research Process in Nursing, 5th edn (Gerrish K Lacey A eds). Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, pp. 367 382.
22. Nahm R Poston I (2000) Measurement of the effects of an integrated point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction. Computers in Nursing 18, 220 229.
23. Nahm ES, Vaydia V, Ho D, Scharf B Seagull J (2007) Outcomes assessment of clinical information system implementation: a practical guide. Nursing Outlook 55, 282 288.
24. Nygren E, Wyatt JC Wright P (1998) Helping clinicians to find data and avoid delays. The Lancet 352, 1462 1466.
25. Oroviogoicoechea C, Elliott B Watson R (2008) Review: evaluating information systems in nursing. Journal of Clinical Nursing 17, 567 575.
26. Otieno OG, Toyama H, Asonuma M, Kanai-Pak M Naitoh K (2007) Nurses' views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: questionnaire development. Journal of Advanced Nursing 60, 209 219.
27. Pawson R Tilley N (1997) Realistic Evaluation. Sage, London.
28. Polit DF Hungler BP (1993) Nursing Research. Methods, Appraisal and Utilization, 3rd edn. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
29. Powsner SM, Wyatt JC Wright P (1998) Opportunities for and challenges of computerisation. The Lancet 352, 1617 1622.
30. Rattray J Jones MC (2007) Essentials elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing 16, 234 243.
31. Rodrigues J (2001) The complexity of developing a nursing information system: a brazilian experience. Computer in Nursing 19, 98 104.
32. Urquhart C Currell R (2005) Reviewing the evidence on nursing record systems. Health Informatics Journal 11, 33 44.
33. Van der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ Hasman A (2003) Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 10, 235 243.
34. Van Ginneken AM (2002) The computerized patient record: balancing effort and benefit. International Journal of Medical Informatics 65, 97 119.
35. Watson R Thompson DR (2006) Use of factor analysis in Journal of Advanced Nursing: literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 55, 330 341.
36. Wyatt JC Wright P (1998) Design should help use of patients' data. The Lancet 352, 1375 1378.
37. Yen M Lo L (2002) Examining test-retest reliability. An intra-class correlation approach. Nursing Research 51, 59 62.