The impact of off-task and gaming behaviors on learning: Immediate or aggregate

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 200, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 507-514

  Cocea, Mihaela ^a   Hershkovitz, Arnon ^b   Baker, Ryan S J D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

Discovery with models; Educational data mining; Gaming the system; Off task behavior

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATES;

DISCOVERY WITH MODEL; EDUCATIONAL DATA MINING; GAMING THE SYSTEM; LEARNING TASKS; OFF-TASK BEHAVIOR; SYSTEM FEEDBACKS;

DATA MINING;

EID: 73149121935     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-028-5-507     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Baker, R.S.J.d., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., and Wagner, A.Z. (2004). Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: When students "game the system". In: Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 383-390. Vienna, Austria.
2. Baker, R.S.J.d., Corbett, A.T., Roll, I., Wagner, A.Z., and Koedinger, K.R., The Relationship Between Gaming the System and Learning in Cognitive Tutor Classrooms. Manuscript under review.
3. Baker, R.S.J.d., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Evenson, E., Roll, I., Wagner, A.Z., Naim, M., Raspat, J., Baker, D.J., and Beck, J.E. (2006). Adapting to When Students Game an Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 392-401.
4. Walonoski, J.A. and Heffernan, N.T. (2006). Detection and analysis of off-task gaming behavior in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 382-391. Jhongli, Taiwan.
5. Baker, R.S.J.d., Corbett, A., and Koedinger, K., Detecting student misuse of intelligent tutoring systems, in the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. 2004: Maceio, Brazil, 531-540.
6. Baker, R.S.J.d., Corbett, A.T., Roll, I., and Koedinger, K.R. (2008). Developing a generalizable detector of when students game the system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18(3), 287-314.
7. Beal, C.R., Qu, L., and Lee, H. (2006). Classifying Learner engagement through integration of multiple data sources. In: Proceedings of The 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2-8. Boston, MA.
8. Johns, J. and Woolf, B. (2006). A dynamic mixture model to detect student motivation and proficiency. In: Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 163-168. Boston, MA.
9. Baker, R.S.J.d. (2007). Modeling and understanding students' off-task behavior in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Proceedings of Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1059-1068. San Jose, California, USA.
10. Stage, S.A. and Quiroz, D.R. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26(3), 333-368.
11. Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., and Koedinger, K.R. (2007). Can help seeking be tutored? Searching for the secret sauce of metacongitive tutoring. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 203-210. Marina del Ray, CA.
12. Arroyo, I., Ferguson, K., Johns, J., Dragon, T., Meheranian, H., Fisher, D., Barto, A., Mahadevan, S., and Wool, B.P. (2007). Repairing disengagement with non-invasive interventions. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 195-202. Marina del Ray, CA.
13. Baker, R.S.J.d., Walonoski, J.A., Heffernan, N.T., Roll, I., Corbett, A.T., and Koedinger, K.R. (2008). Why Students Engage in "Gaming the System" Behavior in Interactive Learning Environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(2), 185-224.
14. Koedinger, K.R. and Corbett, A.T., Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom, in The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, R.K. Sawyer, Editor. 2006, Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, 61-77.
15. Vanlehn, K. (2006). The Behavior of Tutoring Systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(3), 227-265.
16. Beck, J.E. (2006). Using learning decomposition to analyze student fluency development. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Educational Data Mining at the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 21-28. Jhongli, Taiwan.
17. Rodrigo, M.M.T., Baker, R.S.J.d., Lagud, M.C.V., Lim, S.A.L., Macapanpan, A.F., Pascua, S.A.M.S., Santillano, J.Q., Sevilla, L.R.S., Sugay, J.O., Tep, S., and Viehland, N.J.B. (2007). Affect and usage choices in simulation problem solving environments. In: Proceedings of the 13rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 145-152. Marina del Ray, CA.
18. Rodrigo, M.M.T., Baker, R.S.J.d., D'Mello, S., Gonzalez, M.C.T., Lagud, M.C.V., Lim, S.A.L., Macapanpan, A.F., Pascua, S.A.M.S., Santillano, J.Q., Sugay, J.O., Tep, S., and Viehland, N.J.B. (2008). Comparing learners' affect while using an intelligent tutoring systems and a simulation problem solving game. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 40-49. Montreal, Canada.