The value of a statistical life under ambiguity aversion

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 15-26

  Treich, Nicolas ^a  

^a TOULOUSE SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (France)

Author keywords

Ambiguity; Benefit cost analysis; Environmental risks; Health policy; Risk aversion; Uncertainty; Value of a statistical life; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS; HEALTH POLICY; VALUE OF A STATISTICAL LIVES; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

COST ACCOUNTING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HEALTH RISKS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; HEALTH POLICY; MORTALITY RISK; POLICY MAKING; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 73149121175     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: 10960449     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2009.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. M.D. Adler, Why de minimis? working paper, University of Pennsylvania Law School, 2007.
2. H. (d')Albis, E. Thibault, Ambiguity aversion and uncertain longevity, working paper, LERNA, Toulouse School of Economics, 2007.
3. H. Andersson, N. Treich, The value of a statistical life, in: A. De Palma, R. Lindsay, E. Quinet, R. Vickerman (Eds.), The Handbook of Transport Economics, forthcoming, 2009.
4. Belzer R.R. The peril and promise of risk assessment. Regulation 47 (1991) 40-49
5. Bleichrodt H., and Eeckhoudt L. Willingness to pay for reductions in health risks when probabilities are distorted. Health Econ. 15 (2006) 211-214
6. Breyer F., and Felder S. Mortality risk and the value of a statistical life: the dead-anyway effect revis(it)ed. Geneva Pap. Risk Ins. Theory 30 (2005) 41-55
7. Camerer C.F. Individual decision making. In: Kagel J.H., and Roth A.E. (Eds). Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 587-703
8. Camerer C.F., Bhatt M., and Hsu M. Neuroeconomics: illustrated by the study of ambiguity aversion. In: Frey B.S., and Slutzer A. (Eds). Economics and Psychology: A Promising New Cross-Disciplinary Field (2007), CESifo Seminar Series, The MIT Press
9. Chambers R., and Melkonyan T. Pareto optimal trade in an uncertain world: GMOs and the Precautionary Principle. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 89 (2007) 520-532
10. Chateauneuf A., Cohen M., and Meilijson I. Four notions of mean preserving increase in risk, risk attitudes and applications to the Rank-dependent expected utility model. J. Math. Econ. 40 (2004) 547-571
11. Chen Z., and Epstein L.G. Ambiguity, risk, and asset returns in continuous time. Econometrica 70 (2002) 1403-1443
12. Chew S.H., Karni E., and Safra Z. Risk-aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent probabilities. J. Econ. Theory 42 (1987) 370-381
13. Di Mauro C., and Maffioletti A. An experimental investigation of the impact of ambiguity on the valuation of self-insurance and self-protection. J. Risk Uncertainty 13 (1996) 53-71
14. Dionne G., and Lanoie P. Public choice about the value of a statistical life: the case of road safety. J. Transp. Econ. Pol. 38 (2004) 247-274
15. Drèze J. L'utilité sociale d'une vie humaine. Rev. Française Rech. Opérationnelle 6 (1962) 93-118
16. Eeckhoudt L., and Hammitt J.K. Does risk aversion increase the value of mortality risk?. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 47 (2004) 13-29
17. Ellsberg D. Risk ambiguity and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econ. 75 (1961) 643-669
18. Epstein L.G., and Schneider M. Recursive multi-priors. J. Econ. Theory 113 (2003) 1-31
19. Gajdos T., Takashi H., Tallon J.-M., and Vergnaud J.-C. Attitude toward imprecise information. J. Econ. Theory 140 (2008) 23-56
20. Ghirardato P., Maccheroni F., and Marinacci M. Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. J. Econ. Theory 118 (2004) 133-173
21. Gilboa I. Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. J. Math. Econ. 16 (1987) 65-88
22. Gilboa I., and Schmeidler D. Maximin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econ. 18 (1989) 141-153
23. Gollier C. The Economics of Risk and Time (2001), The MIT Press
24. C. Gollier, Does ambiguity aversion reinforce risk aversion? Applications to portfolio choices and asset pricing, working paper, LERNA, Toulouse School of Economics, 2006.
25. J.D. Graham, Comparing opportunities to reduce health risks: toxin control, medicine, and injury prevention, National Center for Public Administration Policy Report No. 192, Dallas, 1995.
26. Halevy Y. Ellsberg revisited: an experimental study. Econometrica 75 (2007) 503-536
27. Hammitt J.K., and Treich N. Statistical vs. identified lives in benefit-cost analysis. J. Risk Uncertainty 35 (2007) 45-66
28. L.P. Hansen, T.J. Sargent, Robustness, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2007.
29. Horowitz J.K., and Carson R.T. Baseline risk and preference for reductions in risk-to-life. Risk Anal. 13 (1993) 457-462
30. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Working Group 3. Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change (1995), Cambridge University Press
31. Jones-Lee M.W. The value of changes in the probability of death or injury. J. Polit. Econ. 99 (1974) 835-849
32. N. Ju, J. Miao, Ambiguity, Learning and Asset Returns, working paper, Boston University, 2007.
33. Karni E. Risk aversion for state-dependent utility functions: measurement and applications. Int. Econ. Rev. 24 (1983) 637-647
34. Kimball A.W. On dependent tests of significance in the analysis of variance. Ann. Math. Statist. 22 (1951) 600-602
35. Klibanoff P. Characterizing uncertainty aversion through preference for mixtures. Soc. Choice Welfare 18 (2001) 289-301
36. Klibanoff P., Marinacci M., and Mukerji S. A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73 (2005) 1849-1892
37. Kreps D.M., and Porteus E.L. Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory. Econometrica 46 (1978) 185-200
38. Lange A. Climate change and the irreversibility effect - combining expected utility and maxmin. Environ. Resource Econ. 25 (2003) 417-434
39. Maccheroni F., Marinacci M., and Rustichini A. Ambiguity aversion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences. Econometrica 74 (2006) 1447-1498
40. Nau R.F. Uncertainty aversion with second-order utilities and probabilities. Manage. Sci. 52 (2006) 136-145
41. Persson U., Norinder A., Krister H., and Gralén K. The value of a statistical life in transport: findings from a new contingent valuation study in Sweden. J. Risk Uncertainty 23 (2001) 121-134
42. Pratt J.W. Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32 (1964) 122-136
43. Pratt J.W., and Zeckhauser R.J. Willingness to pay and the distribution of risk and wealth. J. Polit. Econ. 104 (1996) 747-763
44. Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 3 (1982) 323-343
45. Riddel M., and Shaw W.D. A theoretically-consistent empirical model of non-expected utility: an application to nuclear-waste transport. J. Risk Uncertainty 32 (2006) 131-150
46. Ritov I., and Baron J. Reluctance to vaccinate: omission bias and ambiguity. J. Behav. Dec. Making 3 (1990) 263-277
47. Schmeidler D. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57 (1989) 571-587
48. Segal U. The Ellsberg paradox and risk aversion: an anticipated utility approach. Int. Econ. Rev. 28 (1987) 175-202
49. Shogren J.F. Endogenous risk and protection premiums. Theory Dec. 31 (1991) 241-256
50. Shogren J.F. Economics of diet and health: research challenges. Food Econ. Acta Agr. Scand. C 2 (2005) 117-127
51. Shogren J.F., and Crocker T.D. Risk, self-protection, and ex ante economic value. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 20 (1991) 1-15
52. Stern N.H., et al. The Economics of Climate Change (2007), Cambridge University Press
53. Sunstein C.R. Cognition and cost-benefit analysis. In: Adler M.D., and Posner E.A. (Eds). Cost-Benefit Analysis, Legal, Economic and Philosophical Perspectives (2000), University of Chicago Press
54. Sunstein C.R. Risk and Reason: Safety Law and the Environment (2002), Cambridge University Press
55. Sunstein C.R. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle (2005), Cambridge University Press
56. Tengs T.O., Adams M.E., Pliskin J.S., Gelb-Safran D., Siegel J.E., Weinstein M.C., and Graham J.D. Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk Anal. 15 (1995) 369-390
57. Tengs T.O., and Graham J.D. The opportunity costs of aphazard social investments in life-saving. In: Hahn R.H. (Ed). Risks, Costs, and Lives Saved (1996), Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford
58. N. Treich, The value of a statistical life under ambiguity aversion, working paper LERNA, Toulouse School of Economics, 2008. 〈http://www2.toulouse.inra.fr/lerna/〉.
59. Viscusi W.K. Alarmist decisions with divergent risk information. Econ. J. 107 (1997) 1657-1670
60. Viscusi W.K. Rational Risk Policy (1998), Oxford University Press
61. Viscusi W.K., and Chesson H. Hopes and fears: the conflicting effects of risk ambiguity. Theory Dec. 47 (1999) 157-184
62. Viscusi W.K., and Hamilton J.T. Are risk regulators rational? Evidence from hazardous waste cleanup decisions. Amer. Econ. Rev. 89 (1999) 1010-1027
63. Viscusi W.K., and Evans W.N. Utility functions that depend on health status: estimates and economic implications. Amer. Econ. Rev. 80 (1990) 353-374
64. Viscusi W.K., Magat W.A., and Hubert J. Communication of ambiguous risk information. Theory Dec. 31 (1991) 159-173
65. Viscusi W.K., and Aldy J.E. The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. J. Risk Uncertainty 27 (2003) 5-76
66. R. Watt, A new approximation for the risk premium with large risks, working paper, presented at the EGRIE conference in Cologne, 2008.
67. Weinstein M.C., Shepard D.S., and Pliskin J.S. The economic value of changing mortality probabilities: a decision-theoretic approach. Quart. J. Econ. 94 (1980) 373-396
68. Yaari M.E. The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55 (1987) 95-115