Cotton growth and yield response to simulated 2,4-D and dicamba drift

Weed Technology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 503-506

  Everitt, John D ^a   Keeling, J Wayne ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Crop injury; Herbicide drift

Indexed keywords

COTTON; CROP DAMAGE; FIELD METHOD; GROWTH RATE; GROWTH RESPONSE; HERBICIDE; YIELD RESPONSE;

HALE COUNTY [TEXAS]; TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 73149101608     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-08-061.1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Al-Khatib, K., M. M. Classen, P. W. Stahlman, P. W. Geier, D. L. Regehr, S. R. Duncan, and W. F. Heer. 2003. Grain sorghum response to simulated drift from glufosinate, glyphosate, imazethapyr, and sethoxydim. Weed Technol. 17:261-265.
2. Al-Khatib, K., R. Parker, and E. P. Fuerst. 1992a. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) response to simulated herbicide spray drift. Weed Technol. 6:956-960.
3. Al-Khatib, K., R. Parker, and E. P. Fuerst. 1992b. Sweet cherry (Prunus avium) response to simulated drift from selected herbicides. Weed Technol. 6:975-979.
4. Anonymous. 2005. National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://www.nass.usda. gov. Accessed: January 25, 2007.
5. Banks, P. A. and J. Schroeder. 2002. Carrier volume affects herbicide activity in simulated spray drift studies. Weed Technol. 16:833-837.
6. Bode, L. E. 1987. Spray application technology. Pages 85-110 in C. G. McWhorter and M. R. Gebhardt, eds. Methods of Applying Herbicides. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America.
7. Bond, J. A., J. L. Griffin, J. M. Ellis, S. D. Linscombe, and B. J. Williams. 2006. Corn and rice response to simulated drift of imazethapyr plus imazapyr. Weed Technol. 20:113-117.
8. Deeds, Z. A., K. Al-Khatib, D. E. Peterson, and P. W. Stahlman. 2006. Wheat response to simulated drift of glyphosate and imazamox applied at two growth stages. Weed Technol. 20:23-31.
9. Ellis, J. M. and J. L. Griffin. 2002. Soybean (Glycine max) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to simulated drift of glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Technol. 16:580-586.
10. Everitt, J. D. and J. W. Keeling. 2007. Weed control and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to preplant applications of dicamba, 2, 4-D, and diflufenzopyr plus dicamba. Weed Technol. 21:506-510.
11. Ghosheh, H. Z., E. P. Prostko, C. H. Tingle, and J. M. Chandler. 2002. Simulated pyrithiobac drift effects on corn (Zea mays) and grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Crop Prot. 21:529-532.
12. Hamilton, K. C. and H. F. Arle. 1979. Response of cotton to dicamba. Weed Sci. 27:604-607.
13. Hurst, H. R. 1982. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to simulated drift from selected herbicides. Weed Sci. 30:311-315.
14. Marple, M. E., D. Shoup, K. Al-Khatib, and D. E. Peterson. 2007. Cotton response to simulated drift of seven hormonal-type herbicides. Weed Technol. 21:987-992.
15. Sawchuk, J. W., R. C. Van Acker, and L. F. Friesen. 2006. Influence of a range of dosages of MCPA, glyphosate, and thifensulfuron: Triburon (2:1) on conventional canola (Brassica napus) and white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) growth and yield. Weed Technol. 20:184-197.
16. Snipes, C. E., J. E. Street, and T. C. Mueller. 1991. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to simulated triclopyr drift. Weed Technol. 5:493-498.
17. Snipes, C. E., J. E. Street, and T. C. Mueller. 1992. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to simulated quinclorac drift. Weed Sci. 40:106-109.
18. Smith, D. B., F. D. Harris, and C. E. Goering. 1982. Variables affecting drift from ground boom sprayers. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 25:1499-1503.