PCA of CITES listed pterocarpus santalinus (leguminosae) wood

IAWA Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 121-138

  MacLachlan, Ian R ^a,b   Gasson, P ^b  

^a ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CITES; Dalbergioideae; Leguminosae; Morphometries; Principal components analysis; Pterocarpus santalinus; Quantitative wood anatomy; Red sandal wood

Indexed keywords

FABACEAE; PTEROCARPUS; PTEROCARPUS SANTALINUS;

EID: 73149098069     PISSN: 09281541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/22941932-90000010     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Blackith, R.E. & R.A. Reyment. 1971. Multivariate morphometrics. Academic Press Inc., London.
2. Carlquist, S. 2001. Comparative wood anatomy. Systematic, ecological and evolutionary aspects of dicotyledon wood. Ed. 2. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
3. Cattell, R.B. 1966. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioural Research 1: 245-276.
4. Chattaway, M.M. 1932. Proposed standards for numerical values used in describing woods. Tropical Woods 29: 20-28.
5. Chattaway, M.M. 1955. Crystals in woody tissues; Part I. Tropical Woods 102: 55-74.
6. Chauhan, L. & R. Vijendra Rao. 2003. Wood anatomy of the legumes of India. Their identification, properties and uses. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, India.
7. Chave, J. 2005. Measuring wood density for tropical forest trees. A field manual for the CTFS sites: http://www.edb.ups-tlse.fr/equipel/chave/wood- density-protocol.pdf (Accessed 24th March 2009).
8. Christensen, K.I. 2005. A morphometric study of the geographic variation in Pinus contorta (Pinaceae). Nordic J. Bot. 23: 563-575.
9. CITES. 2002. CITES identification guide - Tropical woods. Guide to the identification of tropical woods controlled under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of wild Fauna and Flora. Authority of the Minister of Environment, Minister of Supply and Services, Canada.
10. Coulaud, J. 1989. Comparaison de quelques Loganiacées à l'aide des caractères quantitatifs et qualitatifs de l'anatomie du bois. Can. J. Bot. 67: 872-878.
11. De Micco.V. 2008. Quantitative wood anatomy in seedlings and tree rings. Abstract of presentation given at Wood Matters: A celebration of the work of John Barnett. The Linnean Society of London, 29 & 30 May 2008.
12. De Micco, V., M. Saurer, G. Aronne, R. Tognetti & P. Cherubini. 2007. Variations of wood anatomy and δ13C within tree rings of coastal Pinus pinaster showing intra-annual density fluctuations. IAWA J. 28: 61-74.
13. Dunn, G. & B.S. Everitt. 1982. An introduction to mathematical taxonomy. Cambridge University Press.
14. Everitt, B.S. & G. Dunn. 2001. Applied multivariate data analysis. Ed. 2. Arnold Publishing, London.
15. Gamble,J.S. 1902. A manual of Indian timbers: an account of the growth, distribution and uses of the trees and shrubs of India and Ceylon, with descriptions of their wood structure. Simpson, Low, Marston & Co. Ltd, London.
16. Gasson.P. 1994. Wood anatomy of the tribe Sophoreae and related Caesalpinioideae and Papilio- noideae. In: I.K. Ferguson & S. Tucker (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics 6, Structural Botany: 165-203. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.
17. Gasson, P. 1999. Wood anatomy of the tribe Dipterygeae with comments on related papilionoid and caesalpinioid Leguminosae. IAWA J. 20: 441-445.
18. Gasson, P., E. Wray & B.D. Schrire. 2004. Wood anatomy of the tribe Millettieae with comments on related papilionoid legumes. IAWA J. 25:485-545.
19. Green, C.L. 1995. Non-wood products 4: Natural colorants and dye stuff. FAO, Rome, Italy.
20. Gupta, S. & B.M. Uniyal. 2003. Indian woods - their medicinal importance and identification. Indian Forester 129: 1225-1240.
21. IAWA Committee. 1989. IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification, with an appendix on non-anatomical information. E.A. Wheeler, P. Baas & P. Gasson (eds.). IAWA Bull. n.s. 10: 219-332.
22. Jadhav, D. 2008. Medicinal plants of India: A guide to ayurvedic and ethnomedical uses of plants. Vol. 2. Pawan Kumar Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India.
23. Jain, A.K. 1996. Improvement of natural regeneration in Pterocarpus santalinus. Indian Forester 122: 783-786.
24. Klitgaard, B.B. & M.Lavin. 2005. The tribe Dalbergieae sens. lat. In: G.Lewis, B.Schrire, B. MacKinder & M. Lock (eds.), Legumes of the world. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.
25. Koch, G., H.G. Richter & U. Schmitt. 2008. CITES wood ID database. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques 297 (3) 69-73.
26. Koopman, W.J.M. & H. Diemont. 2004. Prospects for the molecular identification of CITES- protected timber species and origins. North-South Policy Brief 2004-2013 http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/lang/347791 (Accessed 24th March 2009).
27. Kukachka, B .F. 1977. Sectioning refractory woods for anatomical studies. USDA Forest Research Note FPL-0236. USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin.
28. Lens, F., J.L. Luteyn, E. Smets & S. Jansen. 2003. Ecological trends in the wood anatomy of Vaccinioideae (Ericaceae s.l.). Flora 199: 309-319.
29. Lohi Das, T. & T. Dayanand. 1984. Some distinguishing characteristics between wavy-grained and straight-grained trees of Red Sanders (Pterocarpus santalinus). Indian J. Forestry 7: 68-69.
30. Metcalfe, C.R. & L. Chalk. 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons: leaves, stem and wood in relation to taxonomy with notes on economic uses. Vol. 1. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
31. Möller, M., L.M. Gao, R.R. Mill, D.Z. Li, M.L. Hollingsworth & M. Gibby. 2007. Morphometric analysis of the Taxus wallichiana complex (Taxaceae) based on herbarium material. Bot. J. Lin. Soc. 155: 307-335.
32. Mulliken, T. & P. Crofton. 2008. Review of the status, harvest, trade and management of seven Asian CITES-listed medicinal and aromatic plant species. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, Germany.
33. Nelson, L.R. 2005. Some observations on the scree test, and on coefficient alpha. Thai Journal of Educational Research and Measurement 3: 1-17.
34. Ogden, R., H.N. McGough. R.S. Cowan, L. Chua, M. Groves & R.McEwing. 2008. SNP-based method for the genetic identification of ramin Gony stylus spp. timber and products: applied research meeting CITES enforcement needs. Endangered Species Research. http://www.int-res.com/articles/esr2008/theme/ Forensic/forensicpp4.pdf (Accessed 24 March 2009).
35. Pearson, R.S. & H.P. Brown. 1932. Commercial timbers of India: Their distribution, supplies, anatomical structure, physical and mechanical properties and uses. Vol. 1. Government of India General Publication Branch, Calcutta.
36. Perry, L.M. 1980. Medicinal plants of East and Southeast Asia. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
37. Prain, D. 1900. Report on the Indian species of Pterocarpus. Indian Forester 26: 1-16.
38. Raju,K.K. & A. Nagaraju. 1999. Geobotany of red sanders (Pterocarpus santalinus) - a case study from the southeastern portion of Andhra Pradesh. Environmental Geology 37: 340-344.
39. Ramesh Rao, K. & S.K. Purkayastha. 1972. Indian woods; their identification, properties and uses: Vol. 3. Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun, India.
40. Richter, H.G., K. Gembruch & G. Koch, G. 2007. Software program: CITESwoodID. BFH German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Berlin.
41. Rojo, J.P. 1972. Pterocarpus (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) revised for the World. Phanero- gamarum Monographiae 5:1-119.
42. Seshadri.T.R. 1972. Polyphenols of Pterocarpus and Dalbergia woods. Phytochemistry 11:881-898.
43. Terrazas, T., S. Aguilar-Rodríguez & L. López-Mata. 2008. Wood anatomy and its relation to plant size and latitude in Buddle ja L. (Buddlejaceae). Interciencia 33:46-50.
44. Troup, R.S. 1921. The silviculture of Indian trees. Volume 1: Dilleniaceae to Leguminosae (Papilionaceae). Clarendon Press, Oxford.
45. Walter, K.S. & H.J. Gillet (eds.). 1998. 1997 IUCN Red List of Threatened Plants. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
46. Wiemann, M.C. & B. Williamson. 1989. Wood specific gravity gradients in tropical dry and montane rain forest trees. Amer. J. Bot. 76: 924-928.