Dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients after invasive coronary revascularization with stent placement

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 50, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1134-1141

  Heilmaier, C ^a   Bruder, O ^b   Meier, F ^a   Jochims, M ^b   Forsting, M ^a   Sabin, G V ^b   Barkhausen, J ^c   Schlosser, T W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

^b ELISABETH KRANKENHAUS ESSEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coronary artery; Dobutamine; In stent restenosis; Ischemia; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCES; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERIES; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DOBUTAMINE; FLIP ANGLE; HEART RATES; HIGH DOSE; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERIES; MR SCANNERS; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE; NONINVASIVE TECHNIQUE; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; REVASCULARIZATION; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STEADY-STATE FREE PRECESSION; STENTING; STRESS PROTOCOLS; STRESS-INDUCED; WALL MOTION;

BLOOD VESSELS; DISEASES; HEMODYNAMICS; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

HEART;

CARDIOTONIC AGENT; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DOBUTAMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RESTENOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENT;

ADULT; AGED; CARDIOTONIC AGENTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; DOBUTAMINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS;

EID: 73149094323     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02841850903216692     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997;349:1269-1276
2. Fuster V. Epidemic of cardiovascular disease and stroke: The three main challenges. Presented at the 71st scientific sessions of the American Heart Association. Dallas, Texas. Circulation 1999;99:1132-1137
3. Yusuf S, Reddy S, Ounpuu S, Anand S. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: part I: General considerations, the epidemiologic transition, risk factors, and impact of urbanization. Circulation 2001;104:2746-2753
4. Landau C, Lange RA, Hillis LD. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1994;330:981-993
5. Macaya C, Serruys PW, Ruygrok P, Suryapranata H, Mast G, Klugmann S, et al. Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: one-year clinical follow-up of Benestent trial. Benestent Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:255-261
6. Dibra A, Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Pache J, Schuhlen H, von Beckerath N, et al. Paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimuseluting stents to prevent restenosis in diabetic patients. N Engl J Med 2005;353:663-670
7. Seung KB, Kim YH, Park DW, Lee BK, Lee CW, Hong MK, et al. Effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of ostial left anterior descending artery stenosis with intravascular ultrasound guidance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:787-792
8. Kuettner A, Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Rieger T, Brunn J, Meisner C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:831-839
9. Schlosser T, Mohrs OK, Magedanz A, Nowak B, Voigtlander T, Barkhausen J, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-detector-row computed tomography in patients with a low to moderate pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. Acta Radiol 2007;48:300-307
10. Vanhoenacker PK, Decramer I, Bladt O, Sarno G, Van Hul E, Wijns W, et al. Multidetector computed tomography angiography for assessment of in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. BMC Med Imaging 2008;8:14.
11. Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W, Klein C, Vogel U, Frantz E, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: Comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation 1999;99:763-770
12. Schinkel AF, Bax JJ, Geleijnse ML, Boersma E, Elhendy A, Roelandt JR, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of ischaemic heart disease: myocardial perfusion imaging or stress echocardiography? Eur Heart J 2003;24:789-800.
13. Thiele H, Nagel E, Paetsch I, Schnackenburg B, Bornstedt A, Kouwenhoven M, et al. Functional cardiac MR imaging with steady-state free precession (SSFP) significantly improves endocardial border delineation without contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:362-367
14. Wahl A, Paetsch I, Roethemeyer S, Klein C, Fleck E, Nagel E. High-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular MR imaging after coronary revascularization in patients with wall motion abnormalities at rest. Radiology 2004;233:210-216
15. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539-542
16. Cademartiri F, Mollet N, Lemos PA, Pugliese F, Baks T, McFadden EP, et al. Usefulness of multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:799-802.
17. Cademartiri F, Palumbo A, Maffei E, La Grutta L, Runza G, Pugliese F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT in the assessment of coronary stents. Radiol Med (Torino) 2007;112:526-537
18. Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF, Matsubara T, Terashima M, Tsuchikane E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary instent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: Comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:951-959
19. Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A, Tamci B. Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control. Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:56-63.
20. Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A, Debatin JF, Kerkhoff G, Budde T, et al. Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 2003;226:145-152
21. Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH. Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation 2003;107:917-922
22. Elhendy A, Mahoney DW, Burger KN, McCully RB, Pellikka PA. Prognostic value of exercise echocardiography in patients with classic angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2004;94:559-563 (Pubitemid 39165832)
23. Geleijnse ML, Elhendy A, van Domburg RT, Cornel JH, Rambaldi R, Salustri A, et al. Cardiac imaging for risk stratification with dobutamine-atropine stress testing in patients with chest pain. Echocardiography, perfusion scintigraphy, or both? Circulation 1997;96:137-147
24. Geleijnse ML, Fioretti PM, Roelandt JR. Methodology, feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:595-606.
25. Yao SS, Qureshi E, Sherrid MV, Chaudhry FA. Practical applications in stress echocardiography: Risk stratification and prognosis in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1084-1090
26. Hundley WG, Morgan TM, Neagle CM, Hamilton CA, Rerkpattanapipat P, Link KM. Magnetic resonance imaging determination of cardiac prognosis. Circulation 2002;106:2328-2333 (Pubitemid 35244733)
27. Kuijpers D, Ho KY, van Dijkman PR, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M. Dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of myocardial ischemia with the use of myocardial tagging. Circulation 2003;107:1592-1597
28. Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A, Gebker R, Neuss M, Fleck E, et al. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation 2004;110: 835-842
29. Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Ferrari VA, Rademakers FE, Pellikka PA, Hundley WG, et al. Determination of interobserver variability for identifying inducible left ventricular wall motion abnormalities during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1459-1464
30. Pilz G, Klos M, Ali E, Hoefling B, Scheck R, Bernhardt P. Angiographic correlations of patients with small vessel disease diagnosed by adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:8.
31. Lubbers DD, Janssen CH, Kuijpers D, van Dijkman PR, Overbosch J, Willems TP, et al. The additional value of first pass myocardial perfusion imaging during peak dose of dobutamine stress cardiac MRI for the detection of myocardial ischemia. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24:69-76.
32. Duerinckx AJ, Atkinson D, Hurwitz R. Assessment of coronary artery patency after stent placement using magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:896-902.
33. Spuentrup E, Ruebben A, Mahnken A, Stuber M, Kolker C, Nguyen TH, et al. Artifact-free coronary magnetic resonance angiography and coronary vessel wall imaging in the presence of a new, metallic, coronary magnetic resonance imaging stent. Circulation 2005;111:1019-1026
34. Kuijpers D, van Dijkman PR, Janssen CH, Vliegenthart R, Zijlstra F, Oudkerk M. Dobutamine stress MRI. Part II. Risk stratification with dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients suspected of myocardial ischemia. Eur Radiol 2004;14:2046-2052 (Pubitemid 39481175)
35. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, Kokocinski T, Kelle S, Manka R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: Adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 2007;115:1769-1776
36. Schinkel AF, Elhendy A, Bax JJ, van Domburg RT, Huurman A, Valkema R, et al. Prognostic implications of a normal stress technetium-99m-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion study in patients with a healed myocardial infarct and/or previous coronary revascularization. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:1-6.
37. Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP, Beller GA, Bierman FZ, Davis JL, et al. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: summary article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Circulation 2003;108:1146-1162
38. Sheth T, Dodd JD, Hoffmann U, Abbara S, Finn A, Gold HK, et al. Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:933-938