Large deviation bounds for k-designs

Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 465, Issue 2111, 2009, Pages 3289-3308

  Low, Richard A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

De randomization; Designs; Large deviation bounds; Measure concentration

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; QUANTUM COMPUTERS; STATISTICAL MECHANICS;

DERANDOMIZING; HAAR MEASURE; LARGE DEVIATION BOUNDS; LARGE DEVIATIONS; MEASURE CONCENTRATION; MEASUREMENT-BASED QUANTUM COMPUTATION; PSEUDO RANDOM; PSEUDO-RANDOM DISTRIBUTION; UNITARY GROUP; VON NEUMANN ENTROPY;

DESIGN;

EID: 73149090970     PISSN: 13645021     EISSN: 14712946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2009.0232     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alon, N. & Nussboim, A. 2008 k-wise independent random graphs. 49th Annual IEEE Symp. Foundations of Computer Science, Philadelphia, PA, 25-28 October 2008, pp. 813-822. (doi:10.1109/FOCS.2008.61)
2. Ambainis, A. & Emerson, E. 2007 Quantum t-designs: t-wise independence in the quantum world. IEEE Conf. Comput. Complex. 2007, 129-140. (doi:10.1109/CCC.2007.26) (Pubitemid 47485131)
3. Aubrun, G. 2008 On almost randomizing channels with a short Kraus decomposition. (http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.2900).
4. Barnum, H. & Linden, N. 2001 Monotones and invariants for multi-particle quantum states. J. Phys. A 34, 6787-6805. (doi:10.1088/0305-4470/ 34/35/305)
5. Bellare, M. & Rompel, J. 1994 Randomness-efficient oblivious sampling. 35th Annual IEEE Symp. Foundations of Computer Science, Santa Fe, NM, 20-22 November 1994, pp. 276-287. (doi:10.1109/SFCS.1994.365687)
6. Bremner, M. J., Mora, C. & Winter, A. 2008 Are random pure states useful for quantum computation? Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 190 502. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.190502)
7. Dahlsten, O. & Plenio, M. 2006 Entanglement probability distribution of bipartite randomised stabilizer states. Quant. Inf. Comp. 6, 527-538.
8. Dankert, C., Cleve, R., Emerson, J. & Livine, E. 2006 Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs: constructions and applications. (http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0606161).
9. DiVincenzo, D. P., Horodecki, M., Leung, D. W., Smolin, J. A. & Terhal, B. M. 2004 Locking classical correlations in quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 067 902. (doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.92.067902)
10. Foong, S. K. & Kanno, S. 1994 Proof of Page's conjecture on the average entropy of a subsystem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 1148-1151. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1148)
11. Giraud, O. 2007 Distribution of bipartite entanglement for random pure states. J. Phys. A. 40, 2793-2801. (doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/11/014)
12. Gross, D., Flammia, S. & Eisert, J. 2008 Most quantum states are too entangled to be useful as computational resources. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 190 501. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.190501)
13. Harrow, A. W. & Low, R. A. 2008a Efficient quantum tensor product expanders and k-designs. (http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.2597).
14. Harrow, A. W. & Low, R. A. 2008b Random quantum circuits are approximate 2-designs. (http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.1919).
15. Harrow, A., Hayden, P. & Leung, D. 2004 Superdense coding of quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 187 901. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.187901)
16. Hayden, P., Leung, D., Shor, P. W. & Winter, A. 2004 Randomizing quantum states: constructions and applications. Commun. Math. Phys. 250, 371-391. (doi:10.1007/s00220-004-1087-6) (Pubitemid 39374478)
17. Hayden, P., Leung, D. W., & Winter, A. 2006 Aspects of generic entanglement. Commun. Math. Phys. 265, 95-117. (doi:10.1007/s00220-006-1535-6)
18. Ledoux, M. 2001 The concentration of measure phenomenon. RI, USA: American Mathematical Society.
19. Page, D. N. 1993 Average entropy of a subsystem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291. (doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.71.1291)
20. Popescu, S., Short, A. J. & Winter, A. 2006 Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics. Nat. Phys. 2, 754-758. (doi:10.1038/nphys444) (Pubitemid 44691281)
21. Sanchez-Ruiz, J. 1995 Simple proof of Page's conjecture on the average entropy of a subsystem. Phys. Rev. E 52, 5653-5655 (doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.52. 5653)
22. Shimony, A. 1995 Degree of entanglement. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 755, 675. (doi:10.1111/ j.1749-6632.1995.tb39008.x)
23. Smith, G. & Leung, D. 2006 Typical entanglement of stabilizer states. Phys. Rev. A 74, 062 314. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.74.062314) (Pubitemid 44974754)