Visualizing and testing the impact of place on late-stage breast cancer incidence: A non-parametric geostatistical approach

Health and Place

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 321-330

  Goovaerts, Pierre ^a  

^a BIOMEDWARE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Multiple testing; Poverty; Scan statistic; Screening; Semivariogram

Indexed keywords

CANCER; DISEASE INCIDENCE; GEOSTATISTICS; METHODOLOGY; VARIOGRAM; VISUALIZATION;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER STAGING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTINGENCY TABLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHY; GEOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; POVERTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UNITED STATES;

MICHIGAN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 73049114998     PISSN: 13538292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.10.017     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barry J., and Breen N. The importance of place of residence in predicting late-stage diagnosis of breast or cervical cancer. Health & Place 11 (2005) 15-29
2. Benjamini Y., and Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 57 1 (1995) 289-300
3. Benjamini Y., and Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. The Annals of Statistics 29 4 (2001) 1165-1188
4. Castro M.C., and Singer B.H. Controlling the false discovery rate: a new application to account for multiple and dependent tests in local statistics of spatial association. Geographical Analysis 38 (2006) 180-208
5. Edgington E.S., and Onghena P. Randomization Tests. fourth ed. (2007), Chapman & Hall, New York
6. Farley T.A., and Flannery J.T. Late-stage diagnosis of breast cancer in women of lower socioeconomic status: public health implications. American Journal of Public Health 79 (1989) 1508-1512
7. Fortin M.-J., and Jacquez G.M. Randomization tests and spatially auto-correlated data. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 81 3 (2000) 201-205
8. Goovaerts P. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation (1997), Oxford University Press, New York
9. Goovaerts P. Kriging and semivariogram deconvolution in presence of irregular geographical units. Mathematical Geosciences 40 1 (2008) 101-128
10. Goovaerts P. Medical geography: a promising field of application for geostatistics. Mathematical Geosciences 41 3 (2009) 243-264
11. Goovaerts P. Combining area-based and individual-level data in the geostatistical mapping of late-stage cancer incidence. Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology 1 (2009) 61-71
12. Goovaerts P. AUTO-IK: a 2D indicator kriging program for the automated non-parametric modeling of local uncertainty in earth sciences. Computers and Geosciences 35 (2009) 1255-1270
13. Gumpertz M.L., Pickle L.W., Miller B.A., and Bell B.S. Geographic patterns of advanced breast cancer in Los Angeles: associations with biological and sociodemographic factors (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17 3 (2006) 325-339
14. Hahn K.M.E., Bondy M.L., Selvan M., Lund M.J., Liff J.M., Flagg E.W., Brinton L.A., Porter P., Eley J.W., and Coates R.J. Factors associated with advanced disease stage at diagnosis in a population-based study of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology 166 (2007) 1035-1044
15. Hong S., Ortiz J.M., and Deutsch C.V. Multivariate density estimation as an alternative to probability combination schemes for data integration. In: Ortiz J., and Emery X. (Eds). Geostatistics 2008 (2008), GECAMIN Ltd., Santiago, Chile 197-206
16. Kulldorff M., Information Management Services Inc., 2009. SaTScanTM v8.0: Software for the spatial and space-time scan statistics. 〈http://www.satscan.org/〉.
17. Lin G., and Zhang T. Loglinear residual tests of Moran's I autocorrelation and their applications to Kentucky breast cancer data. Geographical Analysis 39 (2007) 293-310
18. MacKinnon J.A., Duncan R.C., Huang Y., Lee D.J., Fleming L.E., Voti L., Rudolph M., and Wilkinson J.D. Detecting an association between socioeconomic status and late stage breast cancer using spatial analysis and area-based measures. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 16 (2007) 756-762
19. Meyer D., Zeileis A., and Hornik K. Visualizing contingency tables. In: Chen C., Härdle W., and Unwin A. (Eds). Handbook of Data Visualization (2008), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 590-616
20. Romano J.P., and Shaikh A.M. Stepup procedures for control of generalizations of the familywise error rate. The Annals of Statistics 34 4 (2006) 1850-1873
21. Romano J.P., Shaikh A.M., and Wolf M. Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling. TEST 17 3 (2008) 417-442
22. Theus M., and Lauer S.R.W. Visualizing loglinear models. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 8 3 (1999) 396-412
23. Thomas A.J., and Carlin B.P. Late detection of breast and colorectal cancer in Minnesota counties: an application of spatial smoothing and clustering. Statistics in Medicine 22 (2003) 113-127
24. Wang F., and Luo W. Assessing spatial and nonspatial factors for healthcare access in Illinois: towards an integrated approach to defining health professional shortage areas. Health & Place 11 (2005) 131-146
25. Wang F., McLafferty S., Escamilla V., and Luo L. Late-stage breast cancer diagnosis and health care access in Illinois. Professional Geographer 60 (2008) 54-69
26. In: Young Jr. J.L., Roffers S.D., Ries L.A.G., Fritz A.G., and Hurlbut A.A. (Eds). SEER Summary Staging Manual - 2000: Codes and Coding Instructions (2001), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Pub. no. 01-4969, Bethesda, MD