Business versus scientific workflows: A comparative study

SERVICES 2009 - 5th 2009 World Congress on Services

Volumn , Issue PART 1, 2009, Pages 340-343

  Yildiz, Ustun ^a   Guabtni, Adnene ^b   Ngu, Anne H H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDIES; DATAFLOW; SCIENTIFIC WORKFLOWS; WORKFLOW PATTERNS;

DATA FLOW ANALYSIS; WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 72849132312     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SERVICES-I.2009.60     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (4)

1. E. A. Lee and T. M. Parks. Dataflow process networks. pages 59-85, 2002.
2. B. Ludäscher, I. Altintas, C. Berkley, D. Higgins, E. Jaeger, M. Jones, E. A. Lee, J. Tao, and Y. Zhao. Scientific workflow management and the kepler system. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 18(10):1039-1065, 2006.
3. T. Oinn, M. Addis, J. Ferris, D. Marvin, M. Senger, M. Greenwood, T. Carver, K. Glover, M. R. Pocock, A. Wipat, and P. Li. Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows. Bioinformatics, 20(17):3045-3054, 2004.
4. W. M. P. van der Aalst, A. H. M. ter Hofstede, B. Kiepuszewski, and A. P. Barros. Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(1):5-51, 2003.