Usefulness of nasal provocation tests in occupational rhinitis

Rhinology

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 432-437

  Zerah Lancner, Françoise ^a   Pichon, Bertrand ^a   Pairon, Jean Claude ^b   Hervé Guillot, Martine ^b   Marliac, Dominique ^b   Larger, Christian ^a   Ribeil, Stephan ^a   Delclaux, Christophe ^c   Harf, Alain ^a  

^a HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER INTERCOMMUNAL DE CRÉTEIL   (France)

^c HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

Author keywords

Flour; Nasal provocation test; Occupational rhinitis; Persulfate; Posterior rhinomanometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COOKING; COSMETIC INDUSTRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NOSE PROVOCATION TEST; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERENNIAL RHINITIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RHINOMANOMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; BEAUTY CULTURE; COOKERY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NASAL PROVOCATION TESTS; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; RHINITIS, ALLERGIC, PERENNIAL; RHINOMANOMETRY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 72849131417     PISSN: 03000729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4193/Rhin08.092     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. 1. Nicholson P, Cullinan P, Newman Taylor A, Burge P, Boyle C. Evidence based guidelines for the prevention, identification, and management of occupational asthma. Occup Environ Med. 2005; 62: 290-299. (Pubitemid 40592488)
2. Moscato G, Vandenplas O, Gerth van Wijk R, Malo J, Quirce S, Walusiak J, et al. Occupational rhinitis. EAACI Task Force on Occupational Rhinitis. Allergy. 2008; 63:969-980.
3. Moscato G, Pignatti P, Yacoub M, Romano C, Spezia S, Perfetti L. Occupational asthma and occupational rhinitis in hairdressers. Chest. 2005; 128: 3590-3598.
4. Ameille J, Pauli G, Calastreng-Crinquant A, et al. Reported incidence of occupational asthma in France, 1996-1999: the ONAP programme. Occup Environ Med 2003; 60: 136-141.
5. 5. Schwartz H, Arnold J, Strohl K. Occupational allergic rhinitis in the hair care industry; reactions tp permanent waves solutions. J Occup Med. 1990; 32: 473-475. (Pubitemid 20162712)
6. 6. Brisman J, Järvholm B, Lillienberg L. Exposure-response relations for self reported asthma and rhinitis in bakers. Occup Environ Med. 2000; 57: 335-340. (Pubitemid 30265422)
7. Bousquet J, Vignola A, Demoly P. Links between rhinitis and asthma. Allergy 2003; 58: 691-706.
8. Malo J, Chan-Yeung M. Occupational asthma. J. Allergy Clin.Immunol. 2001; 108,3: 317-328.
9. 9. Karjalainen A, Martikainen R, Klaukka T, Saarinen K, Uitti J. Risk of asthma among finnish patients with occupational rhinitis. Chest. 2003; 123: 283-288. (Pubitemid 36126743)
10. Pepys J. Skin test in diagnosis. In: Gell PGH, Coombes RRA, Lachman PJ, eds. 1975;Clinical aspects of immunology. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.: 55-80.
11. Quanjer P, Tammeling G, Cotes J, Pedersen O, Peslin R, Yernault J. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report working party. Standardization of lung function tests. European community for steel and coal. ERJ. 1993; 6, Suppl 16: 5-40.
12. Clement PAR. Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometry. Rhinology 1984; 22: 151-155.
13. Coste A, Lofaso F, d'Ortho M, et al. Protuding the tongue improves posterior rhinomanometry in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Eur Respir J. 1999; 14: 1278-1282.
14. 14. Gosepath J, Amedee R, Mann W. Nasal provocation testing as an international standard for evaluation of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115: 512-516. (Pubitemid 40328003)
15. 15. Gorski P, Krakowiak A, Pazdrak K, Palczynski C, Ruta U, Walusiak J. Nasal challenge test in the diagnosis of allergic respiratory diseases in subjects occupationally exposed to a high molecular allergen (flour). Occup Med. 1998; 48: 91-97. (Pubitemid 28077599)
16. Altman D. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. In Chapman and Hall London 1991: 417-418.
17. 17. Iwatsubo Y, Matrat M, Brochard P, Ameille J, Choudat D, Conso F, et al. Healthy worker effect and changes in respiratory symptoms and lung function in hairdressing apprentices. Occupat Environ Med. 2003; 60: 831-840. (Pubitemid 37363463)
18. 18. Kopferschmitt-Kubler MC, Ameille J, Popin E, et al. Occupational asthma in France: a 1-yr report of the observatoire national de asthmes professionnels project. ERJ. 2002; 19: 84-89. (Pubitemid 34105572)
19. 19. Malo J, Lemiere C, Desjardins A, Cartier A. Prevalence and intensity of rhinoconjunctivitis in subjects with occupational asthma. ERJ. 1997; 10: 1513-1515. (Pubitemid 27311064)
20. Malm L, Gerth van Wijk R, Bachert C. Guidelines for nasal provocations with aspects on nasal patency, airflow, and airflow resistance. Rhinology. 2000; 36: 1-6.
21. Lofaso F, Coste A, d'Ortho M, et al. Nasal obstruction as a risk factor for sleep apnoea syndrome. ERJ. 2000; 16: 639-643.
22. Nathan R, Eccles R, Howarth P, Steinsvag S, Togias A. Objective monitoring of nasal patency and nasal physiology in rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005; 115: 442-459.
23. Druce H, Schumacher M. Nasal provocation challenge. Report of the committee on upper airway allergy. J. Allergy Clin.Immunol. 1990; 86: 261-264.
24. 24. Munoz X, Cruz M, Orriols R. Occupational asthma due to persulfate salts: diagnosis and follow-up. Chest. 2003; 123: 2124-2129. (Pubitemid 36706742)
25. 25. Munoz X, Cruz M, Orriols R, Torres F, Espuga M, Morell F. Validation of specific inhalation challenge for the diagnosis of occupational asthma due to persulfate salts. Occup Environ Med 2004; 61: 861-866. (Pubitemid 39336352)