Characterizing the swimming properties of artificial bacterial flagella

Nano Letters

Volumn 9, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 3663-3667

  Zhang, Li ^a   Abbott, Jake J ^a,b   Dong, Lixin ^a,c   Peyer, Kathrin E ^a   Kratochvil, Bradley E ^a   Zhang, Haixin ^a   Bergeles, Christos ^a   Nelson, Bradley J ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

^c Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLIED FIELD; BACTERIAL FLAGELLUM; BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; EXPERIMENTAL METHODS; HEAD SIZE; HELICAL NANOBELT; IN-VITRO; LATERAL DRIFTS; LIGHT MICROSCOPES; LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; MATRIX; ROTATING MAGNETIC FIELDS; SOLID BOUNDARIES; SWIMMING VELOCITIES; TRANSLATIONAL VELOCITY;

BACTERIOLOGY; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC HEADS; MAGNETIC RECORDING;

RISK ANALYSIS;

CHROMIUM; GOLD; NICKEL;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; FLAGELLUM; MAGNETISM; SURFACE PROPERTY; SWIMMING;

CHROMIUM; FLAGELLA; GOLD; MAGNETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NICKEL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SWIMMING;

EID: 72849128807     PISSN: 15306984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/nl901869j     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Purcell, E. M. Am. J- Phys. 1977, 45 (1), 3-1.1.
2. Lighthill, J. SIAM Review 1976, 18, 161.
3. Dreyfus, R.; Baudry, J.; Roper, M. L.; Fermigier, M.; Stone, H. A.; Bibette, J. Nature 2005, 437, 862-865.
4. Berg, H. C.; Anderson, R. A. Nature 1973, 245 (5425), 380-382.
5. Zhang, L.; Abbott, J. J.; Dong, L. X.; Kratochvil, B. E.; Bell, D.; Nelson, B. J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94 (6), 064107.
6. Purcell, E. M. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 11307.
7. Chattopadhyay, S.; Moldovan, R.; Yeung, C.; Wu, X. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 13712-13717.
8. Ghosh, A.; Fischer, P. Nano Lett. 2009, 9 (6), 2243-2245.
9. Burdick, J.; Laocharoensuk, R.; Wheat, P. M.; Posner, J. D.; Wang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (26), 8164-8165.
10. Sundararajan, S.; Lammert, P. E.; Zudans, A. W.; Crespi, V. H.; Sen, A. Nano Lett. 2008, 8 (5), 1271-1276.
11. Mei, Y. F.; Huang, G. S.; Solovev, A. A.; Urena, E. B.; Moench, I.; Ding, F.; Reindl, T.; Fu, R. K. Y.; Chu, P. K.; Schmidt, O. G. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20 (21), 4085-4090.
12. Solovev, A. A.; Mei, Y. F.; Urena, E. B.; Huang, G. S.; Schmidt, O. G. Small 2009, 5 (14), 1688-1692.
13. Ashkin, A.; Dziedzic, J. M. Science 1987, 235 (4795), 1517-1520.
14. Abbott, J. J.; Peyer, K. E.; Cosentino Lagomarsino M.; Zhang, L.; Dong, L. X.; Kaliakatsos, I. K.; Nelson, B. J. Int. J. Robot. Res., doi: 10.1177/0278364909341658.
15. Prinz, V. Y.; Seleznev, V. A.; Gutakovsky, A. K.; Chehovskiy, A. V.; Preobrazhenskii, V. V.; Putyato, M. A.; Gavrilova, T. A. Physica E 2000, 6(1-4), 828-831.
16. Schmidt, O. G.; Eberl, K. Nature 2001, 410 (6825), 168-168
17. Zhang, L.; Deckhardt, E.; Weber, A.; Schonenberger, C.; Grutzmacher, D. Nanotechnology 2005, 16 (6), 655-663.
18. Zhang, L.; Ruh, E.; Grutzmacher, D.; Dong, L. X.; Bell, D. J.; Nelson, B. J.; Schonenberger, C. Nano Lett. 2006, 6 (7), 1311-1317.
19. Schmidt, O. G.; Schmarje, N.; Deneke, C.; Muller, C.; Jin-Phillipp, N. Y. Adv. Mater. 2001, 13 (10), 756-759.
20. Cho, A. Science 2006, 313 (5784), 164-165.
21. Honda, T.; Arai, K. I.; Ishiyama, K. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1996, 32 (5), 5085-5087.
22. Ishiyama, K.; Arai, K. I.; Sendoh, M.; Yamazaki, A. J. Micromechatpppics 2003, 2 (1), 77-86.
23. Ramia, M.; Tullock, D. L.; Phanthien, N. Biophys. J. 1993, 65 (2), 755-778.
24. Frymier, P. D.; Ford, R. M.; Berg, H. C.; Cummings, P. T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92 (13), 6195-6199.
25. Goto, T.; Nakata, K.; Baba, K.; Nishimura, M.; Magariyama, Y. Biophys. J. 2005, 89 (6), 3771-3779.
26. Berg, H. C.; Brown, D. A. Nature 1972, 239 (5374), 4.
27. Berg, H. C. E. coli in Motion; Springer: New York, 2004.
28. The experiments for v-w plots of Figure 2 are approximately 7 months earlier than those of Figure 3 but with the same batch of ABFs.
29. Lauga, E.; DiLuzio, W. R.; Whitesides, G. M.; Stone, H. A. Biophys. J. 2006, 90 (2), 400-412.
30. We refer to "nonfluidic applied force" and "nonfluidic applied torque" as forces and torques experienced by the ABFs that are not generated by fluid drag effects.