Characterizing attribute distributions in water sediments by geostatistical downscaling

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 43, Issue 24, 2009, Pages 9267-9273

  Zhou, Yuntao ^a   Michalak, Anna M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE VALUES; BENTHIC SEDIMENTS; CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS; CORE SAMPLING; DOWN-SCALING; GEOSTATISTICAL; GEOSTATISTICAL METHOD; HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES; IN-CORE; NEW JERSEY; ORDINARY KRIGING; RISK-BASED REMEDIATION; SITE CHARACTERIZATION; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATIONS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON; UNIFORM RESOLUTION; WATER SEDIMENTS;

INVERSE PROBLEMS; ORGANIC CARBON; REMEDIATION; RISK PERCEPTION; SEDIMENTOLOGY;

SIZE DISTRIBUTION;

ORGANIC CARBON; WATER;

AUTOCORRELATION; FLUVIAL DEPOSIT; HYDRAULIC PROPERTY; INVERSE PROBLEM; REMEDIATION; SEDIMENT POLLUTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CASE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GEOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS; KRIGING; RIVER; SEDIMENT; TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON; UNITED STATES; WATER SAMPLING;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FRESH WATER; GEOLOGIC SEDIMENTS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RIVERS; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

NEW JERSEY; PASSAIC RIVER; UNITED STATES;

EID: 72849107766     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es901431y     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Wang, Q. R.; Kim, D.; Dionysiou, D. D.; Sorial, G. A.; Timberlake, D. Sources and remediation for mercury contamination in aquatic systems - a literature review. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 131, 323-336.
2. Wu, L. Review of 15 years of research on ecotoxicology and remediation of land contaminated by agricultural drainage sediment rich in selenium. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2004, 57, 257-269. (Pubitemid 38376261)
3. Barabas, N.; Goovaerts, P.; Adriaens, P. Geostatistical assessment and validation of uncertainty for three-dimensional dioxin data from sediments in an estuarine river. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 3294-3301. (Pubitemid 32880855)
4. Leenaers, H.; Okx, J. P.; Burrough, P. A. Comparison of Spatial Prediction Methods for Mapping Floodplain Soil Pollution. Catena 1990, 17, 535-550.
5. French, J. R.; Spencer, T.; Murray, A. L.; Arnold, N. S. Geostatistical Analysis of Sediment Deposition in two small tidal wetlands, Norfolk, UK. J. Coastal Res. 1995, 11, 308-321.
6. Kravchenko, A.; Bullock, D. G. A comparative study of interpolation methods for mapping soil properties. Agron. J. 1999, 91, 393-400.
7. Butcher, J. B. Co-kriging to incorporate screening data: Hudson River sediment PCBs. Water Resour. Bull. 1996, 32, 349-356. (Pubitemid 26262821)
8. Little, L. S.; Edwards, D.; Porter, D. E. Kriging in estuaries: As the crow flies, or as the fish swims. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1997, 213, 1-11.
9. Burrough, P. A.; McDonnell, R. A. Principals of Geographical Information Systems; Oxford University Press: New York, 1998.
10. Chilès, J. P.; Delfiner P. Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1999.
11. Western, A. W.; Bloschl, G.Onthe spatial scaling of soil moisture. J. Hydrol. 1999, 217, 203-224.
12. Pardo-Igúzquiza, E.; Chica-Olmo, M.; Atkinson, P. M. Downscaling cokriging for image sharpening. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 102, 86-98.
13. Michalak, A. M.; Kitanidis, P. K. Estimation of historical groundwater contaminant distribution using the adjoint state methodapplied to geostatistical inverse modeling. Water Resour. Res. 2004, 40, W08302.
14. Sun, A. Y.Arobust geostatistical approach to contaminant source identification. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43, W02418. (Pubitemid 46502885)
15. Snodgrass, M. F.; Kitanidis, P. K. A geostatistical approach to contaminant source identification. Water Resour. Res. 1997, 33, 537-546. (Pubitemid 27161837)
16. Yeh, T. C. J.; Zhang, J. Q. A geostatistical inverse method for variably saturated flow in the vadose zone. Water Resour. Res. 1996, 32, 2757-2766. (Pubitemid 27109885)
17. Zimmerman, D. A.; et al. A comparison of seven geostatistically based inverse approaches to estimate transmissivities for modeling advective transport by groundwater flow. Water Resour. Res. 1998, 34, 1373-1413.
18. Fienen, M. N.; Kitanidis, P. K.; Watson, D.; Jardine, P. An application of Bayesian inverse methods to vertical deconvolution of hydraulic conductivity in a heterogeneous aquifer at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Math. Geol. 2004, 36, 101-126. (Pubitemid 38454243)
19. Kyriakidis, P. C. A geostatistical framework for area-to-point spatial interpolation. Geophys. Anal. 2004, 36, 259-289.
20. Michalak, A. M.; Bruhwiler, L.; Tans, P. P. A geostatistical approach to surface flux estimation of atmospheric trace gases. J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109, D14109.
21. Kitanidis, P. K. Quasi-Linear Geostatistical Theory for Inversing. Water Resour. Res. 1995, 31, 2411-2419.
22. Kitanidis, P. K. Introduction to Geostatistics: Applications to Hydrogeology; Cambridge University Press: New York, 1997.
23. Bogaert, P.; Russo, D. Optimal spatial sampling design for the estimation of the variogram based on a least squares approach. Water Resour. Res. 1999, 35, 1275-1289. (Pubitemid 129517353)
24. Kitanidis, P. K.; Lane, R. W. Maximum-likelihood parameterestimation of hydrologic spatial processes by the Gauss-Newton method. J. Hydrol. 1985, 79, 53-71.
25. Pannone, M.; Kitanidis, P. K. Large-time spatial covariance of concentration of conservative solute and application to the Cape Cod tracer test. Transp. Porous Media 2001, 42, 109-132. (Pubitemid 32270335)
26. Michalak, A. M.; Hirsch, A.; Bruhwiler, L.; Gurney, K. R.; Peters, W.; Tans, P. P. Maximum likelihood estimation of covariance parameters for Bayesian atmospheric trace gas surface flux inversions. J. Geophys. Res. 2005, 110, D24107.
27. Schabenberger, O.; Gotway C. A. Statistical Methods for Spatial Data Analysis; Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 2005.
28. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Superfund Site Information Search; 2002; http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/query/basic.htm; accessed Nov. 2002.
29. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration (NOAA). Watershed Database and Mapping Projects; 2002; http://response. restoration.noaa.gov/cpr/watershed/ watershedtools.html;accessed Nov. 2002.
30. Schumacher, B. A. Methods for the Determination of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in Soils and Sediments; Ecological Risk Assessment Support Center, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, 2002.
31. Michalak, A. M. A Gibbs sampler for inequality-constrained geostatistical interpolation and inverse modeling. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44, W09437.