Perception of simulated local shapes using active and passive touch

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 3519-3529

  Smith, Allan M ^a   Chapman, C Elaine ^a   Donati, François ^b   Fortier Poisson, Pascal ^a   Hayward, Vincent ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDEX FINGER; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SIMULATION; SKIN SENSATION; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FEMALE; FINGERS; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PROPRIOCEPTION; REACTION TIME; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; TORQUE; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 72749127312     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00043.2009     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bell CC. An efference copy which is modified by reafferent input. Science 214: 450-453, 1981.
2. Campion G, Wang Q, Hayward V. The pantograph mk II. A haptic instrument. Proc IROS IEEE/RS Int Conf Intell Robots Syst 723-728, 2005.
3. Chapman CE. Active versus passive touch: factors influencing the transmission of somatosensory signals to primary somatosensory cortex. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 72: 558-570, 1994.
4. Chapman CE, Jiang W, Lamarre Y. Modulation of lemniscal input during conditioned arm movements in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 72: 316-334, 1988. (Pubitemid 18230977)
5. Collins DF, Cameron T, Gillard DM, Prochazka A. Muscular sense is attenuated when humans move. J Physiol 508: 635-643, 1998. (Pubitemid 28203975)
6. Connor CE, Johnson KO. Neural coding of tactile texture: comparison of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception. J Neurosci 12: 3414-3426, 1992.
7. Edin BB, Abbs JH. Finger movement responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the dorsal skin of the human hand. J Neurophysiol 65: 657-670, 1991.
8. Flanagan JR, Lederman SJ. Feeling bumps and holes. Nature 389-391, 2001.
9. Gandevia SC. Kinesthesia: roles for afferent signals and motor commands. In: Handbook of Physiology. Exercise: Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems. Neural Control of Movement. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1996, sect. 12, p. 128-172.
10. Ghez C, Lenzi GL. Modulation of sensory transmission in cat lemniscal system during voluntary movements. Pflügers Arch 323: 273-278, 1971.
11. Gibson JJ. Observations on active touch. Psychol Rev 69: 477-491, 1962.
12. Gordon G. Introduction. In: Active Touch, edited by Gordon G. London: W. Clowes, 1978, p. xiii-xxi.
13. Hayward V. Haptic shape cues, invariants, priors, and interface design. In: Human Haptic Perception: Basics and Applications, edited by Grunwald M. Basel: Birkhäuser-Verlag, 2008, p. 381-392.
14. Hollins M, Reisner SR. Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception. Percept Psychophys 62: 695-705, 2000.
15. Jiang W, Chapman CE, Lamarre Y. Modulation of somatosensory evoked responses in the primary somatosensory cortex produced by intracortical microstimulation of the motor cortex in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 80: 333-344, 1990. (Pubitemid 20162103)
16. Jiang W, Chapman CE, Lamarre Y. Modulation of the cutaneous responsiveness of neurones in the primary somatosensory cortex during conditioned arm movements in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 84: 342-354, 1991.
17. Johnson KO, Hsiao SS. Evaluation of the relative roles of slowly and rapidly adapting afferent fibers in roughness perception. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 74: 488-497, 1994.
18. Meftah E-M, Belingard L, Chapman CE. Relative effects of spatial and temporal characteristics of scanned surfaces on human perception of tactile roughness using passive touch. Exp Brain Res 132: 351-361, 2000. (Pubitemid 30330210)
19. Robles-De-La-Torre G. Comparing the role of lateral force during active and passive touch: lateral force and its correlates are inherently ambiguous cues for shape perception. Proc Eurohaptics 2002 :1- 6, 2002.
20. Robles-De-La-Torre G, Hayward V. Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature 412: 445-448, 2001. (Pubitemid 32702709)
21. Seki K, Perlmutter SI, Fetz EE. Sensory input to primate spinal cord is presynaptically inhibited during voluntary movement. Nat Neurosci 6: 1309-1316, 2003. (Pubitemid 37485125)
22. Smith AM, Gosselin G, Houde B. Deployment of fingertip forces in tactile exploration. Exp Brain Res 147: 209-218, 2002. (Pubitemid 35471801)
23. Sommer MA, Wurtz RH. A pathway in primate brain for internal monitoring of movements. Science 296: 1480-1482, 2002.
24. Sperry RW. Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. J Comp Physiol Psychol 43: 482-489, 1950.
25. Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO, Hsiao SS. Human tactile pattern recognition: active versus passive touch, velocity effects, and patterns of confusion. J Neurophysiol 65: 531-546, 1991.
26. Voisin J, Benoit G, Chapman CE. Haptic discrimination of object shape in humans: two-dimensional (2-D) angle discrimination. Exp Brain Res 145: 239-250, 2002. (Pubitemid 34743977)
27. Von Holst E, Mittelstaedt H. Das reafferenzprinzip (The principle of reafference). Naturwissenschaften 37: 264-276, 1950.
28. Williams SR, Chapman CE. Time course and magnitude of movementrelated gating of tactile detection in humans. II. Effects of stimulus intensity. J Neurophysiol 84: 863-875, 2000.
29. Williams SR, Chapman CE. Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. III. Importance of the motor task. J Neurophysiol 88: 1968-1979, 2002.
30. Williams SR, Shenasa J, Chapman CE. Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. I. Importance of stimulus location. J Neurophysiol 79: 947-963, 1998. (Pubitemid 28095911)
31. Wurtz RH, Sommer MA. Identifying corollary discharges for movement in the primate brain. Prog Brain Res 144: 47-60, 2004.
32. Yoshioka T, Bensmaia SJ, Craig JC, Hsiao SS. Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: an analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration. Somatosens Mot Res 24: 53-70, 2007. (Pubitemid 47250626)