Spatial extrapolation of the vine (Vitis vinifera L.) water status: A first step towards a spatial prediction model

Irrigation Science

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 143-155

  Acevedo Opazo, C ^a   Tisseyre, B ^b   Ojeda, H ^c   Guillaume, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE TALCA   (Chile)

^b UMR ITAP   (France)

^c Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CULTIVATION; EXTRAPOLATION;

AUXILIARY INFORMATION; LANGUEDOC-ROUSSILLON; LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; PHENOLOGICAL STAGE; PLANT WATER STATUS; PRE-DAWN LEAF WATER POTENTIALS; SPATIAL PREDICTION MODELING; SPATIAL VARIABILITY;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

CULTIVAR; GROWING SEASON; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; MODEL TEST; PHENOLOGY; PLANT WATER RELATIONS; SPATIAL VARIATION; VINE; VINEYARD;

VITACEAE; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 72749098421     PISSN: 03427188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00271-009-0170-3     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Acevedo-Opazo C, Tisseyre B, Ojeda H, Ortega-Farías S, Guillaume S (2008a) Is it possible to assess the spatial variability of vine water status? J Int Sci Vigne Vin 42: 203-219.
2. Acevedo-Opazo C, Tisseyre B, Guillaume S, Ojeda H (2008b) The potential of high spatial resolution information to define within-vineyard zones related to vine water status. Precis Agric 9: 285-302.
3. Bramley RGV, Hamilton RP (2004) Understanding variability in wine grape production systems 1. Within-vineyard variation in yield over several vintages. Aust J Grape Wine Res 10: 32-45.
4. Carbonneau A, Deloire A, Conztanza P (2004) Leaf water potential meaning of different modalities of measurements. J Int Sci Vigne Vin 38: 15-19.
5. Champagnol F (1984) Eléments de physiologie végétale et de viticulture générale. Champagnol F (ed) Saint-Gely-du-Fesc, pp 351.
6. Choné X, van Leeuwen C, Dubourdieu D, Gaudillère JP (2001) Stem water potential is a sensitive indicator of grapevine water status. Ann Bot 87: 477-483.
7. Dry PR, Loveys BR (1998) Factors influencing grapevine vigour and the potential for control with partial root zone drying. Aust J Grape Wine Res 4: 140-148.
8. Gaudillère JP, van Leeuwen C, Ollat N (2002) Carbon isotope composition of sugars in grapevine, an integrated indicator of vineyard water status. J Exp Bot 53: 757-763.
9. Girona J, Mata M, del Campo J, Arbonés A, Bartra E, Marsal J (2006) The use of midday leaf water potential for scheduling deficit irrigation in vineyards. Irrig Sci 24: 115-117.
10. Guswa AJ (2005) Soil-moisture limits on plant uptake: an upscaled relationship for water-limited ecosystems. Adv Water Resour 28: 543-552.
11. Naor A, Gal Y, Bravdo B (1997) Crop load affects assimilation rate, stomata conductance, stem water potential and water relations of field-grown Sauvignon Blanc grapevines. J Exp Bot 314: 1675-1680.
12. Naor A, Hupert TH, Greenblat Y, Peres M, Kaufman A, Klein I (2001) The response of nectarine fruit size and midday stem water potential to irrigation level in stage III and crop load. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 126: 140-143.
13. Ojeda H, Kraeva E, Deloire A, Carbonneau A, Andary C (2002) Influence of pre and post-veraison water deficits on synthesis and concentration of skins phenolic compounds during the berry growth of Shiraz grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). Am J Enol Vitic 53: 261-267.
14. Ojeda H, Deloire A, Wang Z, Carbonneau A (2004) Determinación y Control del Estado Hídrico de la Vid. Efectos Morfológicos y Fisiológicos de la Restricción Hídrica en Vides. Viticultura/Enología Profesional 90: 27-43.
15. Ojeda H, Carrillo N, Deis L, Tisseyre B, Heywang M, Carbonneau A (2005a) Precision viticulture and water status. II: quantitative and qualitative performance of different within-field zones, defined from water potential mapping. In: Shultz HR (ed) Proceedings of 14th GESCO congress. Geisenheim, Germany: Groupe d'Etudes des Systèmes de Conduite de la Vigne, pp 741-748.
16. Ojeda H, Lebon E, Deis L, Vita F, Carbonneau A (2005b) Stomatal regulation of Mediterranean grapevine cultivars in drought situations of the southern of France. In: Shultz HR (ed) Proceedings of 14th GESCO congress. Geisenheim, Germany: Groupe d'Etudes des Systèmes de Conduite de la Vigne, pp 581-587.
17. Olivo N, Girona J, Marsal J (2009) Seasonal sensitivity of stem water potential to vapour pressure deficit in grapevine. Irrig Sci 27: 175-182.
18. Ortega R, Esser A, Santibañes O (2003) Spatial variability of wine grape yield and quality in Chilean vineyards: economic and environmental impacts. Proceedings of the 4th European conference on precision agriculture, Berlin, Germany, pp 499-506.
19. Riou Ch, Becker N, Sotes Ruiz V, Gomez-Miguel V, Carbonneau A, Panagiotou M, Calo A, Costacurta A, Castro de R, Pinto A, Lopes C, Carneiro L, Climaco P (1994) Le déterminisme climatique de la maturation du raisin: application au zonage de la teneur en sucre dans la communauté Européenne. Office des Publications Officielles des Communautés Européennes. Luxembourg, pp 322.
20. Saporta G (1990) Probabilités, Analyse des données et Statistique, vol xxvi. Technip, Paris, 493 p, ISBN 2-7108-0565-0.
21. Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Brandstreet ET, Hemmingsen EA (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148: 339-346.
22. Schultz HR (1996) Water relations and photosynthetic responses of two grapevine cultivars of different geographical origin during water stress. Acta Hort 427: 251-266.
23. Schultz HR (2003) Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant Cell Environ 26: 1393-1405.
24. Seguin G (1983) Influence des terroirs viticoles sur la constitution de la qualité des vendanges. Bulletin de L'OIV 56: 3-18.
25. Sibille I, Ojeda H, Prieto J, Maldonado S, Lacapere J-N (2005) Determinación de la relación entre las tres aplicaciones de la cámara de presión (potenciales hídricos) y evaluación de la respuesta en el comportamiento isohídrico y anhisohídrico de cuatro cepajes. Congreso Latinoamericano de Viticultura y Enología. Asociación Brasilera de Enología y EMBRAPA. Bentos Gonçalves, 07 a 11 de noviembre.
26. Sibille I, Ojeda H, Prieto J, Maldonado S, Lacapere J-N, Carbonneau A (2007) Relation between the values of three pressure chamber modalities (midday leaf, midday stem and predawn water potential) of 4 grapevine cultivars in drought situation of the southern of France. Applications for the irrigation control. Proceedings of the XVth GESCO conference. Porec, Croatia, pp 685-695.
27. Taylor J, Tisseyre B, Bramley R, Reid A (2005) A comparison of the spatial variability of vineyard yield in European and Australian production systems. Proceedings of the 5th European conference on precision agriculture, pp 907-915.
28. Tisseyre B, Ojeda H, Carrillo N, Deis L, Heywang M (2005) Precision viticulture and water status, mapping the predawn water potential to define within-vineyard zones. In: Shultz HR (Ed) Proceedings of 14th GESCO congress. Geisenheim, Germany: Groupe d'Etudes des Systèmes de Conduite de la Vigne, pp 23-27.
29. Tonietto J, Carbonneau A (2004) A multicriteria climatic classification system for grape-growing regions worldwide. Agric For Meteorol 124: 81-97.
30. van Leeuwen C, Seguin G (1994) Incidences de l'alimentation en eau de la vigne, appréciée par l'état hydrique du feuillage, sur le développement de l'appareil végétatif et la maturation du raisin (Vitis vinifera variété Cabernet franc, Saint-Emilion, 1990). J Int Sci Vigne Vin 28: 81-110.