Systematic status of Agehana elwesi f. cavaleriei based on morphological and molecular evidence

Zoological Studies

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 270-279

  Lu, Chih Chien ^a   Wu, Li Wei ^a   Jiang, Guo Fang ^b   Deng, He Li ^c   Wang, Li Hao ^a   Yang, Ping Shih ^d   Hsu, Yu Feng ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NANJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Chongqing Parnassian Researches Company   (China)

^d NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Agehana maraho; China; COI sequence; Swallowtail; Taiwan

Indexed keywords

CITRUS MAXIMA; PAPILIONIDAE;

EID: 72549108758     PISSN: 10215506     EISSN: 1810522X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bai W, HY Wang. 1998. Swallowtail butterflies in China. Taipei, Taiwan: Sueshin Publisher. (in Chinese)
2. Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
3. Bremer K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
4. Brown JW, S Miller, M Horak. 2003. Studies on New Guinea moths. 2. Description of a new species of Xenothictis Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Archipini). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 105: 1043-1050.
5. Chen H, S Huang. 1993. Study on the bionomics of Agehana elwesi Leech. J. Zhejiang Agric. Univ. 19: 128. (in Chinese)
6. Cheng HC, CT Yao, HC Lin, TW Li, LH Lin, CF Lu. 1996. A guide of endangered wild animals. Chichi, Taiwan: Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute. (in Chinese)
7. Chou I. 1994. Monographia Rhopalocerorum Sinensium. Zhenzhou, China: Henan Scientific and Technological Publishing House. (in Chinese)
8. Clement M, D Posada, K Crandall. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1657-1660.
9. Collins NM, MG Morris. 1985. Threatened swallowtail butterflies of the world. The IUCN red data book. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
10. Costa FO, JR de Waard, JB Boutillier, S Ratnasingham, R Dooh, M Hajibabaei, PD Hebert. 2007. Biological identification through DNA barcodes: the case of the Crustacea. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64: 272-295.
11. D'Abrera B. 1982. Butterflies of the Oriental Region, Part I Papilionidae, Pieridae & Danaidae. Victoria, Australia: Hill House.
12. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
13. Gimenez Dixon M. 1996. Papilio maraho. In IUCN 2007. 2007 IUCN red list of threatened species. Available at www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 9 Mar. 2008.
14. Guindon S, O Gascuel. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52: 696-704.
15. Hajibabaei M, DH Janzen, JM Burns, W Hallwachs, PDN Hebert. 2006. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 968-971.
16. Huang B, S Qi, X Wu. 1993. Butterflies of Agehana on the two sides across the Taiwan Strait. Entomol. J. East China 2: 5-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
17. Igarashi S. 1979. Papilionidae and their early stages. Tokyo: Kodansha. (in Japanese)
18. Klots AB. 1970. Lepidoptera. In SL Tuxen, ed. Taxonomist's glossary of genitalia in insects, 2nd edn. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, pp. 115-130.
19. Le Cerf MF. 1923. Descriptions de formes nouvelles de Lépidoptères Rhopalocères. Bull. Mus. hist. Nat. 24: 360-367.
20. Li C, L Zhang. 1984. A review of the Chinese rare papilionid butterfly Agehana elwesi (Leech). Acta Zootaxonom. Sin. 9: 335. (in Chinese)
21. Posada D, KA Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinfo. Applic. Note 14: 817-818.
22. Posada D, KA Crandall. 2001. Intraspecific gene genealogies: trees grafting into networks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 37-45.
23. Powell JA, JA De Benedictis. 1995. Biological relationships: host tree preferences and isolation by pheromones among allopatric and sympatric populations of western Choristoneura. Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 115: 21-68.
24. Ronquist F, JP Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models . Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
25. Rozas J, JC Sanchez-DelBarrio, X Messeguer, R Rozas. 2003. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19: 2496-2497.
26. Sorenson MD. 1999. TreeRot, vers. 2. Boston, MA: Boston Univ.
27. Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), vers. 4.0 b10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
28. Templeton AR, KA Crandall, CF Sing. 1992. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132: 619-633.
29. van Velzen R, F Bakker, JJA van Loon. 2007. DNA barcoding reveals hidden species diversity in Cymothoe (Nymphalidae). Proc. Netherl. Entomol. Soc. Meet. 18: 95-103.
30. Yen SH, PS Yang. 2000. Illustrated guide to insects protected by the Wildlife Conservation Law (including species protected by CITES appendices). Taipei, Taiwan: Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan. (in Chinese)
31. Yen SH, PS Yang. 2001. Illustrated identification guide to insects protected by the CITES and Wildlife Conservation Law of Taiwan, R.O.C. Taipei, Taiwan: Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan.
32. Zhou L, L Zhang. 1981. A preliminary observation on A. elwesi cavaleriei. Insect Knowl. 18: 254-255. (in Chinese)