Comparison of three weighting schemes in weighted regression analysis for use in a chemistry laboratory

Clinica Chimica Acta

Volumn 411, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 270-279

  Jain, Ram B ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Heteroscedasticity; Precision; Weighted regression analysis

Indexed keywords

COTININE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ASSAY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; VARIANCE; WEIGHTED REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLOOD CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; COTININE; LABORATORIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 72449187196     PISSN: 00098981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.11.021     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Neter J., and Wasserman W. Applied Linear Statistical Models (1974), Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, Illinois Chapter 4
2. Currie L.A. Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities. Pure Appl Chem 67 (1995) 1699-1723
3. Rocke D.M., and Lorenzato S. A two-component model for measurement of error in analytical chemistry. Technometrics 37 (1995) 176-184
4. Zorn M.E., Gibbons R.D., and Sonzogni W.C. Weighted least-squares approach to calculating limits of detection and quantification by modeling variability as a function of concentration. Anal Chem 69 (1997) 3069-3075
5. Zorn M.E., Gibbons R.D., and Sonzogni W.C. Evaluation of approximate methods for calculating the limit of detection and limit of quantification. Environ Sci Technol 33 (1999) 2291-2295
6. Bernert J.T., Turner W.E., Pirkle J.L., et al. Development and validation of a sensitive method for determination of serum cotinine in smokers and non-smokers by liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 43 (1997) 2281-2291
7. Bernert J.T., McGuffy J.E., Morrison M.A., and Pirkle J.L. Comparison of serum and salivary cotinine measurements by a sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method as an indicator of exposure to tobacco smoke among smokers and nonsmokers. J Anal Toxicol 24 (2000) 333-339
8. Nagaraja N.V., Paliwal J.K., and Gupta R.C. Choosing the calibration model in assay validation. J Pharm Biomed Anal 20 (1999) 433-438
9. Almeida A.M., Castel-Branco M.M., and Falcao A.C. Linear regression for calibration lines revisited: weighting schemes for bioanalytical methods. J Chromatogr B 774 (2002) 215-222
10. Sadray S., Rezaee S., and Rezakhah S. Non-linear heteroscedastic regression model for determination of methotrexate in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B 787 (2003) 293-302
11. Szabo G.K., Browne H.K., Ajami A., and Josephs E.G. Alternatives to least squares linear regression analysis for computation of standard curves for quantitation by high performance liquid chromatography: applications to clinical pharmacology. J Clin Pharmacol 34 (1994) 242-249
12. Aboleneen H., Simpson J., and Backes D. Determination of methotrexate in serum by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B 681 (1996) 317-322
13. Wilson M.D., Rocke D.M., Durbin B., and Kahn H.D. Detection limits and goodness-of-fit measures for the two-component model of chemical analytical error. Anal Chim Acta 509 (2004) 197-208
14. Yap W.T., Schaffer R., Hertz H.S., Edward W.V., and Welch M.J. On the difference between using linear and non-linear models in bracketing procedures in isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Biomed Mass Spectrom 10 (1983) 262-264