Comparison of interstellar boundary explorer observations with 3D global heliospheric models

Science

Volumn 326, Issue 5955, 2009, Pages 966-968

  Schwadron, N A ^a,m   Bzowski, M ^b   Crew, G B ^c   Gruntman, M ^d   Fahr, H ^e   Fichtner, H ^f   Frisch, P C ^g   Funsten, H O ^h   Fuselier, S ⁱ   Heerikhuisen, J ^j   Izmodenov, V ^k   Kucharek, H ^l   Lee, M ^l   Livadiotis, G ^m   McComas, D J ^m,n   Moebius, E ^l   Moore, T ^o   Mukherjee, J ^m   Pogorelov, N V ^j   Prested, C ^a   Reisenfeld, D ^p   Roelof, E ^q   Zank, G P ^j   more..

^a Boston University   (United States)

^b Polish Academy of Sciences   (Poland)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^f RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^h LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

ⁱ LOCKHEED MARTIN   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE   (United States)

^k MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^l Univ of New Hampshire   (United States)

^m SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^o NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^q JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HELIUM; HYDROGEN;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; IMPRINTING; MAGNETIC FIELD; SIMULATION; SOLAR SYSTEM; SPACECRAFT; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

ARTICLE; ATOM; ENERGETIC NEUTRAL ATOM; HELIOSPHERE; INTERSTELLAR BOUNDARY EXPLORER; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLAR RADIATION; SPACE FLIGHT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 72449165025     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1180986     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. M. Gruntman et al., J. Geophys. Res. 106, 15767 (2001).
2. V. M. Vasyliunas et al., J. Geophys. Res. 73, 2839 (1968).
3. C. Prested et al., J. Geophys. Res. 113, 6102 (2008).
4. R. Lallement et al., Science 307, 1447 (2005).
5. E. C. Stone et al., Science 309, 2017 (2005).
6. J. D. Richardson et al., Nature 454, 63 (2008).
7. M. Opher et al., Astrophys. J. 640, L71 (2006).
8. M. Opher, E. C. Stone, T. I. Gombosi, Science 316, 875 (2007).
9. D. J. McComas et al., Science 326, 959 (2009); published online 15 October 2009 (10.1126/science.1180906).
10. S. A. Fuselier et al., Science 326, 962 (2009); published online 15 October 2009 (10.1126/science.1180981).
11. H. O. Funsten et al., Science 326, 964 (2009); published online 15 October 2009 (10.1126/science.1180927).
12. N. V. Pogorelov et al., Astrophys. J. 695, 31 (2009).
13. V. Izmodenov, D. Alexashov, A. Myasnikov, Astron. Astrophys. 437, 35 (2005).
14. K. Scherer, H.-J. Fahr, Geophys Res. Lett. 30, 1045 (2003).
15. O. Sternal, H. Fichtner, K. Scherer, Astron. Astrophys. 477, 365 (2008).
16. P. C. Frisch et al., in The IBEX Mission, D. J. McComas, N. A. Schwadron, G. Zank, Eds. (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2009), chap. 9, pp. 28-66 (2009).
17. E. N. Parker, Astrophys. J. 134, 20 (1961).
18. P. Wu et al., J. Geophys. Res. 113, A00B05 (2008).
19. We thank the many dedicated people who have made IBEX a success. Special thanks to K. Goodrich, J. Siegel, K. Maynard, and M. Schwadron for their help. This work was primarily supported by the IBEX program.