Perceptual quality assessment based on visual attention analysis

MM'09 - Proceedings of the 2009 ACM Multimedia Conference, with Co-located Workshops and Symposiums

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 561-564

  You, Junyong ^a   Perkis, Andrew ^a   Hannuksela, Miska M ^b   Gabbouj, Moncef ^c  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Perceptual quality assessment; Quality metric; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ATTENTION; HUMAN VISION; IMAGE/VIDEO QUALITY; PEAK SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; PERCEPTION SYSTEMS; PERCEPTUAL QUALITY; QUALITY METRICES; QUALITY METRICS; SEMANTIC IMAGES; STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY; VIDEO QUALITY; VISUAL ATTENTION;

IMAGE ANALYSIS; METHOD OF MOMENTS; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

PACKET NETWORKS;

EID: 72449152677     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1631272.1631356     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Winkler, S. 2005. Digital video quality: vision models and metrics, John Wiley & Sons Press.
2. Pinson, M. and Wolf S. 2004. A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality. IEEE Trans. Broadcasting, 50 (Sep. 2004), 312-322.
3. Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., and Simoncelli, E. P. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 13 (Apr. 2004), 600-612.
4. Itti L. and Koch C. 2001. Computational modeling of visual attention, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2 (Mar. 2001), 194-203.
5. Lu Z., Lin W., Yang X., et al. 2005. Modeling visual attention's modulatory aftereffects on visual sensitivity and quality evaluation. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 14 (Nov. 2005), 1928-1942.
6. Feng X., Liu T., Yang D., and Wang Y. 2008. Saliency based objective quality assessment of decoded video affected by packet losses. In Proceedings of IEEE Int. Conf. Image Processing (California, USA, Oct. 12-15, 2008), 2560-2563.
7. SaliencyToolbox 2.1, http://www.saliencytoolbox.net.
8. Sheikh H. R., Wang, Z., Cormack L., and Bovik A. C. LIVE Image Quality Assessment Database. http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality.
9. VQEG Sequence, ftp://ftp.crc.ca/crc/vqeg/TestSequences/.
10. Pinson, M. and Wolf, S. 2003. An Objective Method for Combining Multiple Subjective Data Sets. In Proc. SPIE Video Communication and Image Processing Conf. (Lugano, Switzerland, Jul. 2003), 583-592.