Operator theoretic approach to the optimal two-disk problem

IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Volumn 49, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1607-1622

  Djouadi, Seddik M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; FEEDBACK CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS; VECTORS;

BANACH SPACE DUALITY THEORY; FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS; OPTIMAL TWO DISK PROBLEM;

OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 7244258692     PISSN: 00189286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2004.835356     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. E. Hille and R. S. Phillips, Functional Analysis and Semi-Groups. Providence, RI: AMS, 1957.
2. J. C. Doyle, B. A. Francis, and A. R. Tannenbaum, Feedback Control Theory. New York: MacMillan, 1990.
3. J. G. Owen and G. Zames, "Robust disturbance minimization by duality," Syst. Control Lett., vol. 19, pp. 255-263, 1992.
4. G. Zames, "Feedback and optimal sensitivity: Model reference transformations, multiplicative seminorms, and approximate inverses," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-26, pp. 301-320, Apr. 1981.
5. J. F. Bird and B. A. Francis, "On the robust disturbance attenuation," in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision Control, 1986, pp. 1804-1809.
6. B. A. Francis, "On disturbance attenuation with plant uncertainty," presented at the Workshop on New Perspectives in Industrial Control System Design, Oxford, U.K., 1986.
7. J. G. Owen and G. Zames, "Duality theory of robust disturbance attenuation," Automatica , vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 695-705, 1993.
8. ∞ Optimal Control Problems. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1988, vol. 28, pp. 342-358.
9. ∞," Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Elect. Eng., McGill Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada, 1993.
10. G. Zames and J. G. Owen, "Duality theory for MIMO robust disturbance rejection," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 38, pp. 743-752, May 1993.
11. J. Holohan and M. Safonov, "Neoclassical control theory: A functional analysis approach to optimal frequency domain synthesis," Control Dyna. Syst., vol. 40, pp. 297-329. 1992.
12. V. Besson and A. T. Shenton, "An interactive parameter space method for robust performance in mixed sensitivity problems," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr.,vol. 44. pp. 1272-1276, June 1999.
13. C. Foias. H. Ozbay, and A. R. Tannenbaum, Robust Control of Infinite Dimensional Systems. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996.
14. J. W. Helton, "Operator theory, analytic functions, matrices and electrical engineering," in Proc. CBMS Regional Conf. Series Mathematics, vol. 68, 1987.
15. ∞," Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Elect. Eng., McGill Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada, 1998.
16. ∞," Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Elect. Eng. McGill Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada, 1997.
17. S. M. Djouadi and G. Zames, "Operator theoretic solution to the optimal robust disturbance attenuation problem," in Proc. World Multiconf. Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics, vol. 3, July 1997, pp. 25-29.
18. S. M. Djouadi, "On optimal robust disturbance minmization," in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., vol. 3, 1998, pp. 1531-1535.
19. ∞ problem," in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, vol. 3, 1998, pp. 2843-2848.
20. ∞ -optimal control," in Modeling, Robustness and Sensitivity Reduction in Control Systems, R. E Curtain, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1987, vol. F34, NATO ASI Series, pp. 71-78.
21. J. Dieudonnée, "Sur le théorème de Lebesgue Nikodym V," Canadian J. Math., vol. 3, pp. 129-139. 1951.
22. R. Schatten, Norm Ideals of Completely' Continuous Operators. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1960.
23. D. G. Luenberger, Optimization by Vector Space Methods. New York: Wiley, 1968.
24. E. Bishop and R. R. Phelps, "A proof that every banach space is subreflexive," Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 67, pp. 97-98, 1961.
25. R. Ryan, "The F. and M. Riesz theorem for vector measures," Indag. Math., vol. 25, pp. 408-412, 1963.
26. J. B. Garnett, Bounded Analytic Functions. San Diego, CA: Academic. 1981.
27. P Spaces .San Diego. CA: Academic, 1970.
28. 1," J. Soviet Math., vol. 39, pp. 120-148. 1974.
29. W. W. Rogosinski and H. S. Shapiro, "On certain extremum problems for analytic functions," Acta Mathematica, vol. 90, pp. 287-318, 1953.
30. A. Defant and K. Floret, Tensor Norms and Operator Ideals. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland. 1993.
31. ∞," Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 127, pp. 179-203. 1967.
32. ∞ -optimal feedback performance and its efficient computation," Syst. Control Lett., vol. 8, pp. 13-22. 1986.
33. G. Zames and S. K. Mitter, "A note on essential spectra and norms of mixed Hankel-Toeplitz operators," Syst. Control Lett., vol. 10, pp. 159-165, 1988.
34. N. J. Young, "The Nevanlinna-Pick problem for matrix-valued functions," J. Oper. Theory, vol. 15, pp. 239-265. 1986.
35. ∞ optimality criterion," SIAM J. Optim. Control, vol. 25, pp. 815-844, 1987.
36. V. V. Peller and N. J. Young, "Superoptimal analytic approximations of matrix functions," J. Functional Anal., vol. 120. pp. 300-343. 1994.
37. V. V. Peller and S. R. Treil, "Approximation by analytic matrix functions: The four block problem," J. Functional Anal., vol. 148, pp. 191-228, 1997.
38. H. Helson, Lectures on Invariant Subspaces. New York: Academic, 1964.
39. S. M. Djouadi, "MIMO disturbance and plant uncertainty attenuation by feedback," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 2004, submitted for publication.
40. S. Levi, "A note on Hardy spaces of vector valued analytic functions," Bollettino U.M.I., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 53-62. 1972.